Beethoven:
String Quartet No. 14, Op. 131; Missy Mazzoli: Enthusiasm Strategies; Sean
Neukom: 19|20. Beo String Quartet
(Jason Neukom, violin and percussion; Andrew “Glo” Giordano , violin and
whistle; Sean Neukom, viola, keyboard, voice, and electronics; Ryan Ash, cello
and keyboard). NeuKraft Records. $22.87.
Shostakovich:
Sonata for Cello and Piano; Rachmaninoff: Sonata for Cello and Piano. Carmine Miranda, cello; Robert Marler, piano. Navona.
$14.99.
Dorothy
Chang: New Stories for Alto Saxophone and Piano; David Biedenbender: Detroit
Steel; Stacy Garrop: Wrath; Carter Pann: Sonata for Alto Saxophone and Piano. Joseph Lulloff, saxophone; Yu-Lien The, piano. Blue
Griffin Recordings. $15.99.
How does any ensemble find something new to offer when performing highly
familiar music? One approach is to juxtapose the well-known with the
little-known, hopefully choosing less-familiar material that in some way sheds
light on or at least musically complements a work that audiences are likely to
have heard frequently. Thus, the Beo String Quartet – whose members perform on
instruments beyond strings, and whose approach takes in a variety of music
beyond the classical – has chosen to offer Beethoven’s Op. 131 quartet, one of
the greatest works in the classical canon, on the same CD as recent pieces by
Missy Mazzoli and the quartet’s own violist, Sean Neukom. Given the quartet’s
deliberate self-positioning as wide-ranging in its interests (perhaps the word
“quirky” fits as well), and given the fact that NeuKraft Records is the
ensemble’s own label, the ability to put together this unusual program is
certainly present. A reasonable question for prospective listeners to ask,
however, is whether the combination “works” in some way that other performances
of Beethoven’s Op. 131 do not – that is, if this combination sheds some sort of
interpretative light on the music or produces emotional clarity heretofore
missing. Or perhaps that is not quite the right way to think about this musical
mixture, given the fact that Neukom’s work is almost the same length as
Beethoven’s: it could be that the intent is to produce something of a balancing
act between two works separated in their creation by almost 200 years
(Beethoven’s dates to 1826). The actual performance of the Beethoven is quite
fine: tempos are judiciously chosen, emotional highs and lows are clearly
explored, and each of the seven movements is given its own character while
still being shown to fit within the work’s overall and very complex conceptualization.
The Beo String Quartet has a particularly fine sense of ensemble, with
individual players’ sound coming to the fore as needed but with the passages
for the complete group being the most impressive. There is nothing especially
revelatory in this performance, but it is certainly a very fine one on multiple
levels. However, it is unlikely to be most listeners’ first choice for the
Beethoven quartet – indeed, this CD seems specifically designed for people who
know the Beethoven well already and are interested in hearing it in a new
context. The disc opens with Mazzoli’s Enthusiasm
Strategies, which is packed with intense dissonance, plenty of harmonics, a
brief and surprising drop into near-lyricism midway through, and an eventual
accumulation of chords that fades to an inconclusive silence. After this comes
Neukom’s extended four-movement 19|20,
whose title refers to COVID-19 and the year 2020 – guaranteeing the piece both
timeliness and datedness. Certainly Beethoven’s works, including the Op. 131
quartet, are self-referential in many ways, but Beethoven’s genius lies in the
way he connects his personal struggles, pains and worries with those of
humanity at large. Neukom’s work tries to do this more overtly and directly –
the movements are called “Screens,” “Masks,” “Deception,” and “Ashes” – but the
result is much less successful in terms of universality and requires much more
direct knowledge of and involvement in its inspirational material to be
experienced fully. There are impressive moments in Neukom’s work, notably in
the off-kilter waltz of the second movement and the distinctly strange viola
opening of the finale; but there are also plenty of elements that sound
formulaic, such as the fast and highly dissonant notes-tumbling-over-each-other
third movement. The piece takes itself quite seriously (despite its
almost-jaunty opening), but it is difficult to hear it as a journey through
darkness to light, as its very end makes it clear that it is supposed to be.
Neither Mazzoli’s piece nor Neukom’s fits in any particularly clear way with
Beethoven’s, so this disc will be of interest primarily to listeners who simply
want to hear, in close aural proximity, three very different pieces, one of
them an undoubted masterpiece, the others examples of how far musical
communication has come – or has not come – since Beethoven’s time.
Combining Shostakovich with Rachmaninoff is less of a leap than mixing
Beethoven with two contemporary composers, but the specific mixture of cello
sonatas by Shostakovich (from 1934) and Rachmaninoff (from 1901) is not
especially common – although the works share intriguing similarities and differences,
as do their composers. Rachmaninoff fled the then-new Soviet Union and never
returned, while Shostakovich stayed in his homeland and endured many years of
artistic and personal depredations as a result. The two composers’ underlying
sensibilities are parallel in many ways – yet as different as the fact that
Shostakovich called his work a sonata for cello and piano, while Rachmaninoff
originally labeled his as being for piano and cello. A new Navona CD features
first-rate performances of both works by Carmine Miranda and Robert Marler. The
long lines of the first movement of the Shostakovich come through to very fine
effect and are particularly neatly contrasted with the emergent sarcasm of the
very short (three-minute) second movement. The third movement is deeply
heartfelt, to the point of being depressive, while the brief finale
(three-and-a-half minutes) contrasts so strongly with the third that it almost
seems to belong in a different piece altogether. Miranda’s rich cello sound is
dominant throughout in this piece – but in the Rachmaninoff, as the composer’s
original title indicated, cello and piano are essentially equal, with piano
perhaps actually being in the forefront more often than not. There are beauties
aplenty in this hyper-Romantic sonata, but it has a tendency to sprawl, and
Miranda and Marler do not always keep it fully under control: the first and
longest movement, in particular, seems somewhat disconnected. The second lives
up to its Allegro scherzando
designation without the underlying wry qualities of Shostakovich. The third,
slow movement – surprisingly, the shortest in the sonata – is beautifully
spun-out in the style that Rachmaninoff was later to perfect and even exploit,
and emerges here as the emotional heart of the piece. Despite the substantial
piano part, this Andante is wholly in
the realm of the cello, whose expressive warmth comes through from start to
finish. The finale has an almost martial air about it, and the interplay of the
instruments is handled with aplomb. The complementary nature of these two
minor-key sonatas (Shostakovich’s in D minor, Rachmaninoff’s in G minor) is
apparent in these performances, and the disc will certainly be of interest to
listeners who may have heard one or the other of these works in the past but
may not have considered the intriguing ways in which they have similarities and
differences.
The four world premières on a Blue Griffin Recordings CD featuring Joseph Lulloff on saxophone and Yu-Lien The on piano are also packed with similar and different elements, but here the differences are more apparent than the similarities. New Stories for Alto Saxophone and Piano (2013) by Dorothy Chang has four movements intended to explore Eastern and Western influences and, to some extent, conflate them. “Floating Worlds” builds to increasing complexity as it progresses, then returns to the simplicity of its opening. “A Tall Tale Told” has a sense of stop-and-start rhythm (or tale-telling) in which flowing and shrill elements combine. “Reflection” is mostly given over to the saxophone, which is reflective more in the thoughtful sense than in that of a mirror. “Folksong” concludes the suite with intricate rhythms and a more-upbeat tempo for both instruments than is present in the other movements. Detroit Steel (2019) by David Biedenbender is a single-movement work that almost has overtones of musique concrète – it is for unaccompanied saxophone and gives Lulloff plenty of opportunities to explore his instrument’s range, rhythmic qualities and differing sound capabilities. Wrath (2019) by Stacy Garrop is in three movements called “Menace,” “Shock” and “Amok,” and uses the saxophone in some very interesting ways: it actually growls in the first movement, sounds a bit tipsy (if not “shocky”) in the second, and zips about like an out-of-control clarinet in the third (although it is somewhat too controlled to be said to be running amok). Last on the CD is Carter Pann’s Sonata for Alto Saxophone and Piano (2016), a highly varied and frequently intriguing work that is not really tightly knit enough to be called a sonata but is more along the lines of a suite. Certainly it flits through many moods, many tempo changes and many forms of required virtuosity for Lulloff (the saxophone is very definitely the lead instrument here). The first movement, “The Black Cat,” is more emphatic and dramatic than feline. The second is a collection of “Three Songs Without Words,” the first pleasant and rather sweet, the second partly frenetic and partly gentle, the third slow and heartfelt. The third movement, “Cuppa Joe,” is short (less than two minutes) but contains enough notes for triple its length – a veritable barrage of them, tumbling over each other in what seems to be a hyper-caffeinated frenzy. The finale is an in memoriam movement called “Epilogue: Lacrimosa in memory of Joel Hastings,” and remembers a close friend of the composer more with wistfulness and regret than with deep grief. Pann’s work as a whole is multifaceted and not really cohesive, but Lulloff follows its every twist and turn, and The, to the extent possible with a comparatively limited piano part, is supportive and engaged as well. This piece is, in effect, a microcosm of the entire CD, neatly showcasing the many capabilities of the saxophone and of Lulloff’s abilities – a treat for fans of this specific instrument and of contemporary music written for it, even though the works themselves never really attain (or appear to seek) any significant level of communicative profundity along the lines of those by Beethoven, Shostakovich and Rachmaninoff.
No comments:
Post a Comment