Elgar: String Quartet; Carissima; Fauré: String Quartet; Préludes, Op. 103—Nos. 4, 8 and 9. Eusebius Quartet (Beatrice Philips and Sofia Kolupov, violins; Adam Newman, viola; Hannah Sloane, cello). SOMM. $18.99.
Ignaz Brüll: Violin Sonatas Nos. 2 and 3; Suite for Violin and Piano. Brian Buckstead, violin; Irena Ravitskaya, piano. MSR Classics. $14.95.
There is a great deal of crepuscular music associated with the last years of Romanticism and the early 20th century. The moodiness was scarcely new in that time period – brooding and the entire Romantic era go together – but as harmonic structures loosened and composers sought new sound combinations, while geopolitical events cast an aura of gloom that is clearer retrospectively but was somewhat evident even in its own time, darker sounds crept into more and more composers’ works and often cast a pall over concerts in the later Victorian era and thereafter. The overall ethos is one thing that the string quartets of Elgar (1917) and Fauré (1924) have in common. They have other superficial similarities as well: each is its composer’s sole work in the form; both are in E minor; in both, the slow movement is the longest; and both follow the traditional three-movement pattern of Allegro-Andante-Allegro, with a qualifying adjective for the tempo indications here and there. The works, however, were written at very different times in their composers’ lives, and it is to the credit of the Eusebius Quartet that its performers do such a fine job of exploring both the similar aspects of these works and their differing sounds. Elgar’s quartet is the more immediately appealing of the two, managing the tricky balance of intimacy and depth of feeling, on the one hand, and emotional restraint, on the other, with considerable skill. Elgar was recovering from a bout of poor health when he wrote the quartet, and although it is not overtly autobiographical, its delicate balance of feelings could very well reflect his gradually returning physical vigor. The quartet features some notable instrumental touches, such as the absence of the first violin in the first 22 bars of the second movement, and the use of mutes throughout that movement’s extended coda. Although the quartet is a work of wartime, its predominant impression is one of quiet that hovers somewhere between peace and resignation; its mood is largely contemplative, and the Eusebius Quartet conveys that admirably in its recording for the SOMM label. Fauré’s quartet is more acerbic, dissonant and morose than Elgar’s, and more interesting intellectually if somewhat less affecting emotionally. It dates to the last year of Fauré’s life, a time when he – like Beethoven and Smetana – had lost his hearing. And like some of Beethoven’s late quartets, Fauré’s seems to reach for a sound world beyond what audiences would expect, one audible more through inward perception than traditional aural absorption. The austerity of this work’s sound, well-communicated in the Eusebius Quartet’s performance, contrasts with the greater richness of Elgar’s quartet and, in sometimes surprising ways, with the underlying Romanticism that remained a touchstone for Fauré right to the end: he lived for only one month after finishing his quartet. Ultimately, these two works have more differences than similarities, but their Weltanschauung is similar and is reflective of the time period in which both were written. The CD also includes, as if for a touch of leavening, four string-quartet arrangements by Iain Farrington of shorter pieces that communicate more straightforwardly than do the quartets. Elgar’s Carissima, originally written for small orchestra, is graceful, simple and pretty. The three Fauré Préludes, from a set of nine created for piano solo, vary in mood. No. 4, the only one in a major key (F), shares some of the gentle nature of the Elgar encore, while No. 8 (C minor) is more intense, and No. 9 strongly reflects the twilight mood of Fauré’s quartet and its time period – and is written, like the quartet, in E minor.
E minor is also the key of one of the sonatas by Ignaz Brüll on a new MSR Classics CD. Brüll (1846-1907) is almost completely unknown today, although the second of his eight operas, Das goldene Kreuz (1875), was quite successful for a time. Brüll was well-known as a pianist – he regularly played with Brahms in private performances of Brahms’ works – so it is scarcely a surprise that the piano elements of his violin-and-piano works are well-crafted and expressive. As Brian Buckstead and Irena Ravitskaya show, however, Brüll did not allow the piano complete dominance in this chamber music: he had a finely honed sense of appropriate balance of the two instruments, allowing each considerable expressive potential. The expressiveness, however, is very firmly in the late-Romantic idiom, infused with some genuinely morose feelings but also possessing a sense of the gestural, as if Brüll knows what is expected of music in the Brahmsian and post-Brahmsian vein and has no desire to move beyond those expectations. The three-movement Sonata No. 3 (1899) explores its E minor tonality thoroughly, but with emotion that is more evanescent than deeply felt – it is noteworthy that the second movement, where darkness and depth might be expected, is an Andante con moto that is pleasant but emotionally superficial. The four-movement Sonata No. 2 in A minor (1890) is similarly unchallenging in terms of emotive capacity: here the slow second movement is marked Cavatine—Andante, and again the pleasantries abound, including some lovely use of decorative violin trills, but profundity is altogether absent. And the following lighthearted Scherzo and concluding dancelike Allegro ma non troppo sound much more congenial than intense and belie the potential drama of the sonata’s home key. As well-performed as the sonatas are, they indicate little more than that Brüll was a composer of a specific period with little interest in moving beyond the typical strictures of his time. He actually seems somewhat more comfortable in major keys, including the A major of his Suite for Violin and Piano (1882), whose five movements’ pleasantries are disconnected from each other. Here hints of somewhat surprising creativity peek through, as in the unexpected minor key of the second-movement Scherzo and the gentle sway of the third-movement Reigen (“dance”). The work as a whole is insubstantial but enjoyable – indeed, that description applies to the entirety of this (+++) CD. No listener will likely deem Brüll a significant rediscovery on the basis of this disc, but anyone interested in some of the forgotten byways of late Romanticism will here experience the ephemeral enjoyment of the twilight of a major musical era.