Mahler: Symphony No. 8 (“Symphony of a Thousand”). Emily Newton, Michaela
Kaune and Ashley Thouret, sopranos; Iris Vermillion and Mihoko Fujimura, altos;
Brenden Patrick Gunnell, tenor; Markus Eiche, baritone; Karl-Heinz Lehner,
bass; Tschechischer Philharmonischer Chor Brno, Slowakischer Philharmonischer
Chor Bratislava, Knabenchor der Chorakademie Dortmund, and Dortmunder
Philharmoniker conducted by Gabriel Feltz. Dreyer Gaido. $29.99 (2 SACDs).
Mahler: Symphony No. 8 (“Symphony of a Thousand”). Manuela Uhl, Polina
Pastirchak and Fatma Said, sopranos; Katrin Wundsam, mezzo-soprano; Katharina
Magiera, alto; Neal Cooper, tenor; Hanno Müller-Brachmann, baritone; Peter
Rose, bass; Choir of the Städtischer Musikverein zu Düsseldorf,
Philharmonischer Chor Bonn, Kartäuserkantorie Köln, Clara-Schumann-Jugendchor
Düsseldorf, and Düsseldorfer Symphoniker conducted by Adam Fischer. Avi.
$17.99.
Mahler’s Symphony No. 8 attained its
famous sobriquet after the composer led the first performance, on September 12,
1910, with a complement of 1,008 musicians and singers. Yet even that number would
not be enough in the future, Mahler suggested: he preferred that the two harps
be doubled and suggested that in very
large halls, the first player in each woodwind section should be doubled and
the number of strings increased. But then what to do in smaller halls and
less-grandiose circumstances? The composer left no suggestions on that topic
and would perhaps not have approved of the work being played in any venue that
could not accommodate a thousand or more performers. That has left some very
basic decision-making about this gigantic symphony/cantata to conductors and to
producers of concerts and recordings. Two excellent new versions of the
symphony make very different decisions about it – and, in testimony to just how
transcendent this music is, both lead to highly convincing and deeply moving
performances that nevertheless differ in fundamental ways.
Gabriel Feltz’s recording on Dreyer Gaido uses the lesser complement of
performers, “only” about 300, as befits a release assembled from live
performances at Konzerthaus Dortmund. The acoustics of the hall are such that
the sound of the work is remarkably full, and the engineering of the two-SACD
set provides depth and clarity that further refine the overall auditory experience.
It was not really necessary to spread the release onto two discs: Feltz’s
pacing brings the symphony in at about 82 minutes, and quite a few recent
recordings have been released of that length or longer without any diminution
of audio quality (the elimination of the unnecessary applause at the work’s
very end would have reduced the time a bit as well). Be that as it may, Feltz
offers a magisterial performance with exceptional attention to the thematic
unity that Mahler brought to a work whose two parts are, on the surface, as
different as they can possibly be. By using and reusing themes from the opening
Veni, creator spiritus in the Schlußszene aus
“Faust,” Mahler draws attention to
the way in which the creative spirit permeates this entire work and also
inspires (literally “breathes into”) both the ninth-century hymn and the 19th-century
work of Goethe. Feltz gets the grandeur (and, in truth, the grandiosity) of
this conception exactly right, and the combination of motivic connections with
especially strong attention to the portions of the work using massed voices
results in a performance whose beauty is that of a cantata/oratorio on a
massive scale. Feltz certainly knows how to bring forth the effect of his
choruses: the utter silences of this performance punctuate it elegantly, and
the almost-silences are particularly impressive, notably when the chorus barely
emerges for the first time in the work’s second part (a technique Mahler first
used in his “Resurrection” symphony). The very last chorus, with its
celebration of a mystical union of souls with the Virgin Mary – called not only
“the eternal feminine” by Goethe and Mahler but also “goddess,” a decidedly
nontraditional appellation that is at variance with accepted Christian thinking
– crowns this performance with the resounding magnificence that Mahler sought,
even using less than one-third the complement of musicians he called for and
himself used.
Adam Fischer’s recording on the Avi label is a bit faster-paced – 77
minutes on a single disc – and uses far more performers than Feltz’s, nearly
600. Yet this is a more-ethereal reading than Feltz’s. Fischer focuses not on
Mahler’s ability to generate enormous levels of sound but on his skill, so
evident in other symphonies, for creating delicate, chamber-music-like effects
through use of individual instruments, or small groups of them, within an
overall very large force. Fischer’s choruses enunciate more clearly than do
Feltz’s, and when individual voices are called for within choruses or between
them, those sections are very distinct indeed. The same is true of purely
instrumental portions of the symphony: the instrumental interlude in the first
movement is exceptionally well-handled here, as is the truly lovely
strings-and-harp section in the second movement, just before the words Dir, der Unberührbaren. Like
Feltz’s, Fischer’s release is assembled from several live performances –
mounting this symphony as a studio recording is quite unusual nowadays, given
the sheer scale of the requirements – and Fischer seems energized by the
perfectly quiet audience in indefinable but somehow clear ways. The solo voices
here are somewhat lighter than those used by Feltz – Fischer even chooses a
mezzo-soprano instead of one of the two altos Mahler calls for – but far from
detracting from the seriousness of the musical message, the comparative
lightness produces a clearer and more-direct sense of communication with the
audience than in Feltz’s grander and broader conception. The very end of the symphony
in the two performances is indicative of the different approaches: Feltz builds
to a final chorus that sweeps over the audience and carries it and the music
into a flood of emotion; Fischer focuses strongly on the instrumental section
immediately before the last chorus,
producing an effect that is genuinely magical, but the chorus itself is
somewhat more matter-of-fact than under Feltz – it is heartfelt, yes, but in a
way that is perhaps more human and less heavenly. Feltz’s overall pacing is
likely closer to Mahler’s in 1910: that performance reportedly ran 85 minutes.
But Fischer’s brisker tempos never seem rushed, and they make the symphony
appear, if anything, more eager to communicate its message of overwhelming and
unending heavenly bliss and the ultimate acceptance of wer immer strebend sich bemüht (“whoever always strives and aspires”). Lovers of
Mahler’s “Symphony of a Thousand” will not go wrong with either of these
recordings – or both. They show quite clearly just how astonishing is the communicative
power of this amazing (and in some ways very strange)
symphony-that-is-more-than-a-symphony. And they show that in very different
ways and with very different-sized complements of performers. Neither of these
releases is the “Symphony of a Thousand” by numerical count, but both connect
quite clearly with the intent that led Mahler to put together so gigantic an
assemblage for the work’s première.
No comments:
Post a Comment