Cece Loves Science. By Kimberly Derting and
Shelli R. Johannes. Illustrations by Vashti Harrison.
Greenwillow/HarperCollins. $17.99.
Shark Dog and the School Trip Rescue! By Ged Adamson. Harper.
$17.99.
On the First Day of First Grade. By Tish Rabe. Pictures by
Sarah Jennings. Harper. $9.99.
Over-simplification of what it means to go
to school is normal in books for young readers and is frequently done in the
name of encouraging them and being relentlessly upbeat. The technique is now
being applied not only to school in general but also, specifically, to STEM –
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics – and, even more
specifically, to STEM as it relates to girls, who are under-represented in the STEM
fields. It is generally accepted that it would be good to encourage more girls
to study STEM, and books such as Cece
Loves Science are intended to do just that. The question is whether the
over-simplifying of the topic will make more girls want to engage in STEM
studies or will quickly bring them frustration when they find out how far from
reality a book like this proves to be. Certainly Kimberly Derting and Shelli R.
Johannes are well-meaning in their presentation, and Vashti Harrison’s
illustrations nicely complement their text, in which super-smart Cece (who is, unnecessarily
but in accordance with current political correctness, biracial) constantly asks
questions and is always encouraged by her teacher to do so. The teacher (unsurprisingly
named Ms. Curie) tells Cece’s class about “famous scientists from history,” the
first being Caroline Herschel – one deliberate over-simplification and
girl-oriented element of the story involves making Herschel (1750-1848) the No.
1 scientist mentioned, so parents should make sure they know about her in case
children ask who she was and what she did. The main theme of the book involves
Cece and her best friend, Isaac, teaming up for a science project: “Science is
all about possibilities,” write Derting and Johannes, which is not quite right
but will do for young readers. Eventually Cece and Isaac decide to study
whether dogs like vegetables, using Cece’s dog (named, inevitably, Einstein) as
their subject. The book includes several “worksheets” as the study progresses
through stages including observation (how Einstein usually behaves) and
experimenting (offering different vegetables alone or disguised). Einstein will
not eat vegetables, and Cece becomes frustrated because “our project was
boring,” but then she notices that Einstein likes bananas – and she and Isaac
make a banana smoothie that also includes vegetables. Einstein consumes it, and
Cece and Isaac celebrate, and the conclusion is that “real scientists have fun
finding answers.” Well, yes, but the authors of Cece Loves Science either do not understand or do not care how
scientific studies really work. Cece and Isaac force their project to come out
as they wish – scientists do not do that; it is a major ethical breach. Also,
the project’s topic is whether dogs, plural, eat vegetables, and all Cece and
Isaac actually discover is that one specific dog will eat vegetables under
certain specific circumstances. In other words, the whole premise of Cece Loves Science is flawed – in the
name of creating a sufficiently intriguing story to get girls interested in
STEM studies. The book is to be commended for furthering a worthy cause and
featuring attractive characters doing age-appropriate activities that may
indeed get real-world children interested in learning about science. But it
falls very far short of being an introduction, even a very simple introduction,
to the way science and scientists really work – and may therefore open the STEM
door to girls who will find, when they become involved, that reality is very
different from its portrayal by Derting and Johannes.
There is nothing realistic about Shark Dog
– a playful puppy-bodied pet with a fin on top and huge sharklike front end and
mouth – and certainly nothing realistic about the life of the “famous explorer”
who discovered Shark Dog during a voyage with his daughter, to whom Shark Dog
promptly attached his affection. The original Shark Dog book was simply a romp,
and a very amusing one. Ged Adamson’s second story about the character is less
successful, altgough there is still considerable fun in Shark Dog and the School Trip Rescue! Shark Dog is invited on a
class trip and soon gets into the spirit of things – just as any dog would.
Class members take photos of a bird perched on Shark Dog’s fin, watch as Shark
Dog leaps into a frog-filled pond, and see Shark Dog roll around in mud when a
sudden rainstorm blows in. Shark Dog makes amusing messes several times,
flinging water and frogs about and shaking himself to get the mud off (and onto
the kids). But nothing he does is particularly sharklike, and that is the
problem here: substitute any ordinary dog for Shark Dog and this story would
not change at all. In fact, when the class finds footprints and Shark Dog
sniffs them and then tracks them to their origin – a bear cub trapped by a
downed tree – there is no reason at all for this to be a Shark Dog book. Yes,
Shark Dog helps the class lift the tree enough so the cub can get his leg out
and head into the woods (apparently quite unhurt) – but a book about any dog on
a school field trip would have exactly the same event and exactly the same
outcome. Shark Dog then leads the class back to the school bus for the return
trip, just as any dog would, and all ends happily. Kids who find Shark Dog
engaging will enjoy seeing all the new pictures of him that Adamson draws, and
all the new scenes in which he appears. But unlike the first Shark Dog book,
this second one is really just a book about an unusual-looking dog: nothing at
all is made of anything sharklike except for his appearance. So yes, there is
fun to be had in Shark Dog and the School
Trip Rescue! But it is generic fun, not anything specific to Shark Dog.
On
the First Day of First Grade is a generic-enjoyment book as well. Tish Rabe
here becomes the latest author to adapt “The 12 Days of Christmas” into a
different season, and here the emphasis – not really realistically – is on
everything being fun all the time: “On the first day of first grade I had fun
right away.” Of course, parents and teachers want first grade to be enjoyable,
but the constant emphasis on fun is a bit over-the-top here in its repeated
references to “laughing and learning all day,” which is the most-often-repeated
line. Still, one should not be too Scrooge-like about this well-intentioned
book, pleasantly illustrated by Sarah Jennings. The second day here involves
helping in class, the third is “choosing books to read,” the fourth is about
planting seeds, the fifth is “telling the time,” and so on – with each earlier experience
repeated, just as in the well-known song. The gender-balanced, racially
assorted class – the norm nowadays in books for young readers – plays music,
throws a ball, puts on a play and more, all to the song’s cadence and always
with kids having a wonderful time with whatever they are doing. The objective,
of course, is to encourage first-graders (or, really, any young school-age
children) to find the fun in all the things that happen in school, and that is
certainly an unexceptionable desire even if it is less than realistic for all
children. Kids who may be nervous or worried about school will probably not
find anything encouraging here, since everyone shown has a constant great time
and there is nothing in the book to show someone who is not having fun how to enjoy school more. So On the First Day of First Grade is really for upbeat kids who may
have some slight trepidation about school and need reassurance that everything
will be all right. The book does, however, have a very disappointing
conclusion, with a final page that says, “First grade is so fun!” That is
simply illiterate (and never mind that some consider it to be acceptable
slang). “Fun” is a noun, and Rabe knows it: “I had fun right away.” So the
conclusion should be, “First grade is so much fun!” Both Rabe and her editor
could use a little remedial time having fun in school, in a grade where parts
of speech are taught.
No comments:
Post a Comment