Alkan: Complete Transcriptions,
Volume 1—Mozart. José Raúl López, piano. Toccata Classics. $18.99.
Weber: Wind Concertos—Clarinet
Concerto No. 1; Bassoon Concerto; Horn Concerto; Concertino for Clarinet and
Orchestra. Maximiliano Martin, clarinet; Peter Whelan, bassoon; Alec
Frank-Gemmill, horn; Scottish Chamber Orchestra conducted by Alexander
Janiczek. Linn Records. $19.99.
Nielsen: Symphonies Nos. 1-6;
Violin Concerto; Flute Concerto; Clarinet Concerto. Nikolaj Znaider,
violin; Robert Langevin, flute; Anthony McGill, clarinet; New York Philharmonic
conducted by Alan Gilbert. Dacapo. $64.99 (4 SACDs).
The ability of great music
to be twisted, turned, arranged and rearranged in sometimes-surprising ways is
frequently deemed a special characteristic of Bach, whose works have been said
to be so pure that they somehow transcend the instruments on which they are
performed. This is an exaggeration, of course, but it helps explain how and why
Bach’s works became and remain so popular even when performed in ways the
composer could never have imagined – most prominently, on modern pianos rather
than harpsichords, clavichords and organs. What is interesting is to observe
ways in which other composers’ music can also have a wonderful effect on
instruments for which it was never intended – in particular, again, on piano.
When great pianists have adapted orchestral and vocal pieces for keyboard, some
genuine insights have resulted – along with a feeling of discovery, for listeners,
of elements of the original works of which they may not have been aware.
Liszt’s transcriptions of Beethoven’s symphonies and Wagner’s operatic works
are excellent examples of this, but Liszt was in fact only one of the 19th-century
composer/performers to produce transcriptions at the pinnacle of the form.
Another, and one almost never thought of in this regard, was Charles-Valentin
Alkan, whose quirky, even bizarre original works have been slowly making their
way into pianists’ and audiences’ awareness but whose transcriptions remain
almost totally unknown. José Raúl López has made a commitment to record all the Alkan transcriptions
for Toccata Classics, and if the first disc is any indication, the sequence
will be absolutely marvelous. Alkan made only five transcriptions of music by
Mozart, the most enthralling by far being that of the Piano Concerto No. 20,
Op. 466 – the D minor concerto that triumphantly if somewhat jarringly erupts
at the very end into an apotheosis in the sunniest D major. Alkan’s
transcription, which has never been recorded before, is the highlight of López’s CD. The technical requirements
of the music are, it should go without saying, prodigious, and López handles them with unerring
skill. But more interesting are the musical
requirements of a transcription that very carefully arranges Mozart’s concerto
by emphasizing certain lines and de-emphasizing others, by bringing some string
parts to the fore pianistically while allowing others to settle in the
background, and by producing a gigantic 79-bar first-movement cadenza that is
scarcely Mozartean but that fascinatingly explores tonal and harmonic elements
of the music while building a Romantic-era edifice upon the Classical-era
foundation. This is an utterly fascinating transcription, true in the main to
Mozart while unhesitatingly making choices in accord with Alkan’s own thinking
in the 1860s. It is accompanied on this disc by two other world première recordings, of the Minuet and
Trio from Symphony No. 40 and the chorus Ne
pulvis et cinis superbe from Thamos,
König in Ägypten, K. 345. Also here are
Alkan’s transcriptions of the Minuet and Trio from Symphony No. 39 and the
Andante from the String Quartet in A, K. 464. In all these transcriptions,
Alkan shows himself particularly adept at bringing forth multiple melodic lines
while keeping the harmony secure, largely through highly sophisticated pedal
use. Alkan’s textural understanding and very obvious respect for Mozart’s
creativity meld beautifully with his full comprehension of the still-developing
pianos of his own time – a fact that actually points to the one disappointment
of this CD, which is that it is performed on a modern Steinway piano rather
than one of the Erards that Alkan favored and that provide very different effects
in intonation and, especially, pedal use. That one element aside, López’s handling of this material is
at the very highest level, his command of Alkan’s style as superimposed on
Mozart is first-rate, and his pianism is very distinguished. This is a revelatory
CD, primarily where the concerto is concerned but also in terms of the new and
different light the whole disc shines on Alkan and, though him, on Mozart.
Carl Maria von Weber’s wind
concertos are intriguing in a different way, for all that they have their own
ties to Mozart (the composer’s father was the uncle of Mozart’s wife, Constanze).
Weber created unusually up-to-date works (for their time) for solo clarinet,
following in Mozart’s footsteps in giving prominence to the instrument but
taking matters considerably further in two concertos and the Concertino. The full, rich tone of the
clarinet, an inherent quality of the instrument to modern listeners, was by no
means its normal sound in Weber’s time – indeed, it was largely Weber who
institutionalized it in writing pieces for clarinetist Heinrich Bärmann, who had followed in the
footsteps of Joseph Beer, the performer who developed the mellower approach as
a reaction to the more-brilliant, more-piercing French clarinet style. Two of
the four works on a new Linn Records CD showcase the clarinet and Weber’s
handling of it, which included an operatic approach to the instrumental
material and plenty of chances for the soloist to show off his technique. The Concertino was Weber’s first work of
this type, with the two concertos – only the first of which, unfortunately, is
heard here – following soon after. Weber’s operatic inclinations and Bärmann’s subtlety of style mesh
particularly well in some unusual sections, both in the Concertino and in the first concerto, in which the hue of the music
significantly darkens and Weber comes up with striking ways of using
instruments (for example, the clarinet playing with divisi violas in the Concertino).
Maximiliano Martin, first clarinetist of the Scottish Chamber Orchestra, has a
fine tone and nuanced approach to this music, and the accompaniment of the
ensemble under Alexander Janiczek is first-rate, with the result that the two
clarinet works offered here leave one wishing the other concerto had been
included as well. However, the concerto performances by two other of the
orchestra’s first-chair players help make up for that lack. Weber’s bassoon
concerto puts the instrument through its paces in different ways in each of the
three movements, with the usual good humor ascribed to the bassoon evident only
in the finale. The first movement shows the instrument in something like
military mode, while the second shows it quite capable of lyricism – a
capability known to, among others, Vivaldi, who wrote more than three dozen
concertos for bassoon and certainly never treated the instrument as the “clown”
it was later to sound like. Peter Whelan makes a fine bassoon soloist, with
great skill throughout his instrument’s range, and deserves credit for trying
to re-create the 1822 edition of the work, which represents Weber’s revision of
his 1811 original – instead of using the heavily edited 1865 version preferred
by most performers. Matters are not quite as admirable in Alec Frank-Gemmill’s
handling of Weber’s horn concerto, however: the playing is quite good for
anyone favoring a modern valve horn over the hand horn for which the work was
written, but the edition performed is another matter. Frank-Gemmill uses a
much-ornamented 1847 version for piano duet as the basis of his performing
edition; and he also somewhat overdoes the cadenza between the second and third
sections, which he plays in his own version. The playing itself is quite fine,
but the instrument’s tone and the relative ease with which Frank-Gemmill is
able to play notes that would be quite difficult on a hand horn lend the piece
a smoothness and evenness that Weber surely did not expect. Whether he would
have preferred it is unknown, of course, but it is a trifle disappointing at a
time of heightened sensitivity to historic performance practices to hear this
concerto in a version so different from what the composer intended.
What Carl Nielsen intended
as a concerto composer is another matter. Weber wrote just one concerto for
bassoon and one for horn; Nielsen, just one apiece for violin, flute and
Weber’s favored clarinet. All three of Nielsen’s concertos are late works,
dating respectively to 1911-12, 1926 and 1928. The violin concerto moves uneasily
on an arc from intensity to frivolity and includes a tribute to Bach through
use of the notes of the letters of his name. The flute concerto has what could
be called a more serious kind of humor, less rollicking and more controlled,
after an opening that is on the verge of sounding hysterical. The bass trombone
becomes a distinctly odd partner for the flute part of the time, in one of
Nielsen’s more ingenious instrumental pairings. And the clarinet concerto
includes atonality, an important snare-drum role, and a contrast between deep
melancholy and demonic march passages – Nielsen’s predilection for strong
instrumental and thematic contrasts is especially evident here. The concertos
are very well played by violinist Nikolaj Znaider and two first chairs of the New York
Philharmonic, Robert Langevin and Anthony McGill. And the orchestra itself performs with
excellent responsiveness and a very warm tone for conductor Alan Gilbert in a
four-SACD Dacapo recording that also includes all six Nielsen symphonies. The
concerto performances are so good that they lift this entire release of live
recordings to, or at least close to, a top rating – one that the symphonies do
not really merit on their own. The suppleness of the orchestra as accompanist,
and the sensitivity that Gilbert shows in weaving the solo instruments into and
through the entire ensemble, are less in evidence in the symphonies. Gilbert’s
conducting tends to highlight the similarities among the six, which are really
distinguished mostly by their differences: Nielsen had an extraordinary range
of thoughts and ideas to pack into symphonic form. The fact that Nielsen
repeatedly contrasts near-violent loud and fast passages with quiet ones that
seem almost to drift dreamily is clear enough here – but the balancing of the
importance of these two stylistic elements is missing: Gilbert generally relishes
the intensity but becomes unfocused, even flabby, in the rhythms of the
more-thoughtful sections.
Thus, Symphony No. 1 strides
forth tempestuously from its opening notes, but soon calms down to a level of
overdone placidity – the music need not subside into quietude and a lack of
forward impetus, but it does here. On balance, though, the First is more
successful in this recording than the Fourth (“The Inextinguishable”), with
which it shares a disc: No. 1’s fundamentally classical balance provides it
with a graspable structure that the Fourth – which is essentially a single
extended movement – does not inherently possess. The Fourth tosses and turns,
pulling the audience hither and yon before eventually reaching the affirmation
of its title – that music, like life itself, is ultimately inextinguishable.
But the elements of the struggle toward that conclusion are downplayed by
Gilbert, so the eventual sense of triumph is lessened and muted. And Gilbert
seems, oddly, to hold back a bit when the big climaxes become too big, notably in the “timpani duel”
of No. 4, which is simply not as intense and gripping as it needs to be in
order to pave the way for the sense of positive completion that succeeds it. On
the disc of Nos. 2 (“The Four Temperaments”) and 3 (“Sinfonia espansiva”), the
Third is better by far. Here the orchestra plays with outstanding warmth, the
rhythms are supple, the first movement sounds truly expansive (its tempo
marking, Allegro espansivo, gives the
symphony its title), and the vocalise in the slow movement (featuring soprano
Erin Morley and baritone Joshua Hopkins) is lovely. The finale, though, is on the plodding side,
with elements of rhythmic flabbiness not heard earlier in the work. And No. 2
is a real disappointment. There is
simply not enough differentiation among these temperaments: the interpretation
as a whole, not just the second movement, is phlegmatic – this symphony just does
not seem to engage Gilbert and the orchestra as No. 3 does. The finale, in particular, is far too sedate
– very far from sanguine. On the recording of Nos. 5 and 6, Gilbert tends to
make the works too bland, smoothing their sharp edges and generally taming
their frequently outré orchestrations, rhythms and harmonies. Thus, in the
Fifth, where the timpani player is at one point famously instructed to play ad libitum and try to disrupt the rest
of the orchestra, Gilbert keeps things under such tight control that this
aleatoric, highly provocative section becomes merely noisy, which was not
Nielsen’s idea at all. As for the bizarre Sixth (“Sinfonia semplice”), which is
deliberately crass, overdone, silly, mocking, sarcastic, and at times just
plain weird, this work invites a conductor to pull out all the stops and really
show what he or she can get an orchestra to do. Gilbert may be up to the
challenge, but if so, he chooses not to rise to it: this Nielsen Sixth is very
mild indeed, its jagged edges smoothed to such a degree that even the very end
(when the bassoons keep playing after everything is finished, as if the
conductor failed to cue them to stop) sounds less surprising and strange than
it should. Still, the recordings of all these symphonies deserve recognition
for the very fine playing of the ensemble and the excellent sound with which
the discs are endowed. And the concerto performances show how much Gilbert is
capable of doing with Nielsen’s music when he really sets his mind to it and
complements the orchestra’s performance with excellent interpretations by
first-rate soloists.
No comments:
Post a Comment