Schumann: Davidsbündlertanze;
Papillons; Carnaval. Boris Giltburg, piano. Naxos. $9.99.
Felt: Works for Solo Piano by
Matthew Durrant, Rachel Lee Guthrie, Amir Zaheri, Richard Pressley, Byron
Petty, Ron Nagorcka, and Robert A. Baker. Karolina Rojahn, J. Bradley Baker
and Robert A. Baker, piano. Navona. $16.99.
Carl Vollrath: Music for Clarinet
and Piano, Volume 1. Michael Norsworthy, clarinet; Yoko Hagino, piano.
Navona. $14.99.
A good deal of interesting
piano music comes in the form, more or less, of the suite: a series of short
pieces that collectively add up to something much longer, larger and more
significant. The three Schumann works played by Boris Giltburg on a new Naxos
CD are all of this type. Davidsbündlertanze,
written in 1837, consists of 18 characteristic pieces designed to express the
contrasting views of music that Schumann attributed to his two alter egos,
Florestan (impetuous) and Eusebius (lyrical and poetic). The theme of the whole
set was written by Clara Wieck, later Clara Schumann, and the pieces are filled
with personal elements and thoughts – but it is not necessary to know those to
enjoy the many ways in which Schumann picks up Clara’s mazurka and develops,
transforms, alters, expands and thoroughly analyzes it. The key to the success
of this suite is to do more than simply play the music – the best pianists
assume the Florestan and Eusebius roles (each piece is ascribed to one or both
of them) and genuinely immerse themselves in the music. Giltburg does not quite
do this – his overall handling of the pieces is a trifle on the cool side,
although everything is very well played. Giltburg seems to stand slightly back
from the extreme Romanticism of the Davidsbündlertanze,
which is understandable in the 21st century but does not serve the
work optimally. His piano technique, though, is certainly very high-quality. Papillons, which dates to 1831, is a
much more dancelike work. There are 12 movements in it, mostly unrelated to
each other, collectively representing a masked ball. The maintenance of regular
dance rhythms, particularly that of the waltz, is a key here, with the pianist
needing to maintain regularity without making the work sound repetitive – and
Giltburg, for the most part, does this well. Some themes of Papillons were later used by Schumann in
Carnaval (1834-35), which the
composer specifically called Scènes mignonnes sur quatre notes (“Little Scenes on Four Notes”). Here there
are 21 miniatures, and here everything is connected – the opposite of the
situation in Papillons, although Carnaval too is a series of
scenes from a masked ball. Schumann includes a multitude of personal
musical references while still shaping the overall feeling of the elaborate ball.
In Carnaval, the chordal passages and use of rhythm are particularly
striking and can be significant challenges for pianists, and here as elsewhere
on this disc, Giltburg has no problem with the work’s technical demands. But
his interpretation remains a trifle cool, with a sort of distancing from the
music that turns Carnaval into more of a period piece and less of a
strong personal expression than it needs to be. Giltburg’s CD will please
anyone who simply wants to hear excellent piano playing – it offers plenty of
that – but it is somewhat disappointing for those looking to hear excellence in
the understanding and interpretation of the music of Schumann.
None of the seven composers whose solo
piano music is heard on a new Navona CD called Felt creates anything approaching
the Schumann suites, but all offer well-made, fairly short works that make good
use of the piano’s expressive capabilities. The compositions are so different
that few listeners are likely to enjoy all of them equally – and the disc will
be of most interest to those who simply want to hear various ways in which
contemporary composers use the piano. Matthew Durrant’s Three Excursions for Piano is more
technique than anything else, with the composer using twelve-tone, bitonality,
repetition and other compositional approaches more or less for their own sake.
Rachel Lee Guthrie’s Winter is
primarily a work of impressionism, a technique that Durrant does not explore.
Amir Zaheri’s Prelude to the Holy Dark
is supposed to illustrate a return to the time before electricity, although the
connection of the piece to that time is by no means clear. Richard Presley’s in memoriam was written for the 200th
anniversary of Chopin’s birth; it sounds like a work struggling toward an
unattained epiphany, although how that connects with Chopin is not readily
apparent. Byron Petty’s Propuntal
Displays, the first word of its title the “opposite” of “contrapuntal,” is
a sort of tribute to Bach, actually using counterpoint in its increasingly
difficult sections. Anything by Ron
Nagorcka, on the other hand, stands opposed to Bach’s methodical approach to
music, being essentially a series of random notes within a given rhythmic
structure – one of those pieces worked out more as an intellectual exercise
than a communicative work. Karolina Rojahn performs all these works except
Zaheri’s, which is played by J. Bradley Baker. The two other pieces on the CD
are written and performed by Robert A. Baker. One is supposed to tie into
Shakespeare’s Sonnet LXV, from which it takes its questioning title: Nor gates of steel so strong, but Time
decays? The other, Valence I, makes
no pretense to specific interpretation or meaning. Both sound enough alike so
the works’ titles could reasonably be switched without listeners necessarily
finding their responses to the music any different. Ultimately, that is the
weakness of a great deal of the music here: it may have specific meaning to
those who created it, but the composers have little inclination (and perhaps
little ability) to reach across the gap between themselves and their audience
to communicate effectively with any specificity.
The piano has half the
expressive potential rather than all of it on a Navona CD that is the first
volume of the clarinet-and-piano music of Carl Vollrath. Much of the music here
is intellectually interesting and will be attractive to listeners familiar with
the techniques used by other composers to communicate with the audience –
although it may not make a strong visceral connection in its own right. What
Vollrath does is produce works called Copland’s
Coda (looking at some of the stylistic influences on Copland in his student
years in Paris), Delius’s Dream (also
looking at French influence on a composer, this time from later in his life),
and similarly allusive and alliterative works called Poulenc’s Plunk and Prokofiev’s
Polka. Then there is Coco and Igor, yet
another piece showcasing French influence, but this time involving Coco Chanel
and Igor Stravinsky as portrayed in a 2009 film from which a musical phrase is
taken and expanded. And there is even more Francophilia in Piazzolla in Paris, which focuses on the modernized and updated
tangos of Ástor Piazzolla and is the first movement of a four-movement suite
called Past Recollections (the other
movements are Braziltina, Little Violet
and An Autumn Afternoon). Also on
this disc are two works with more-personal experiential referents, Companion Piece and A Place Some Where. The ability of Vollrath to connect any of these
various occurrences and experiences with those of listeners is modest at best –
the works themselves are nicely shaped, often humorous, and attractive to
listen to in the performances by Michael Norsworthy and Yoko Hagino, but they
have the effect of distancing themselves from the audience rather than making
any strong connection. Add the composer’s own voice to the voices of the other
composers whose music he is reflecting and commenting upon, and the result is
material twice removed from the audience – easy to appreciate with one’s mind
but not offering a significant emotional connection. There are compositional
skill, ironic thought, and well-made musical themes on this CD, but there is
not much that is moving or emotive in any way beyond the superficial.
Regarding the above review for 'Felt', I would very much like to see the name of its author in order to know to whom I can address more specifically my comments. Their complete disrespect, presumptuousness and lack of understanding is shocking for someone who publicly posts a so-called review. Do not afford any significance to the above review; if interested, listen and consider for yourself. Furthermore, contact any one of the composers for any true insight. They, I'm sure, will be more than happy to communicate with words more perspective on what they say with music.
ReplyDelete