Michael Haydn: String Quartets
(complete). Salzburger Haydn-Quintett (Hiro Kurosaki and Frank Stadler,
violins; Herbert Lindsberger and David Glidden, violas; Josetxu Obregón, cello). CPO. $33.99 (2 CDs).
The Bach Project: Organ Works,
Volume 1. Todd Fickley, Schnitger Organ (1721), St. Michaëlskerk, Zwolle, The Netherlands/Hauptwerk.
MSR Classics. $12.95.
Schumann: Märchenerzählungen;
Charles Martin Loeffler: Deux Rhapsodies; August Klughardt: Schilflieder;
Robert Kahn: Serenade in F minor. Ensemble Schumann (Thomas Gallant, oboe;
Steve Larson, viola; Sally Pinkas, piano). MSR Classics. $12.95.
Couperin: Les Nations—Sonades et
Suites de Simphonies en Trio. Juilliard Baroque (Monica Huggett and Cynthia
Roberts, violins; Sandra Miller, flute; Gonzalo X. Ruiz, oboe; Dominic Teresi,
bassoon; Daniel Swenberg, theorbo and Baroque guitar; Sarah Cunningham, viola
da gamba; Kenneth Weiss, harpsichord). Naxos. $25.99 (2 CDs).
Franz Joseph Haydn wrote in
just about every musical form in existence in his time, but not that of the
string quintet – he said no one ever asked him to. However, his younger
brother, Michael (1737-1806), delved into this particular form five times, and
although his quintets are so rarely performed as to be genuine oddities, a new
CPO recording shows them to be highly worthy works deserving of much greater
familiarity. Michael Haydn is perhaps best known nowadays for writing
“Mozart’s” Symphony No. 37 – Mozart wrote only the introduction to the first
movement. But he was a more-significant musical force in his own time, although
never at his brother’s level. That contemporary judgment is reinforced by the
performances by the very fine Salzburger Haydn-Quintett: this is music that
breaks no significant new ground for its time, but is poised, elegant,
well-balanced and thoroughly well-made. The composer actually designated only
one of these works (in F, Perger 110, MH 367) as a straightforward “quintetto.”
He called another (in C, Perger 108, MH 187) a “notturno/quintetto” and a third
(in G, Perger 109, MH 189) simply a “notturno.” These designations show how
Michael Haydn used the second viola to darken the overall tone of this music
and give it a more “nocturnal” feeling. He also had movements dip frequently into
minor-key episodes despite these works’ home major keys – an effective device
managed skillfully. Each of the remaining two quintets (in B-flat, Perger 105,
MH 412, and in F, Perger 112, MH 411) is labeled “divertimento.” Each of them
has more than the four movements of the other quintets: each contains a second
minuet and a stately, well-formed set of variations. They are not, however,
appreciably lighter in structure or tone than the “notturno” and “quintetto”
works. Indeed, there is little overall variation evident in the composer’s
approach to this instrumental form: the pieces date to as early as 1773 and as
late as 1786, but unlike his older brother, Michael Haydn tended to evolve
formally to a certain point and then, having found a sort of musical comfort
zone, to remain within it. Indeed, “comfortable” is the overall feeling
generated by his quintets: this is music reflecting the best mid-to-late-18th-century
techniques and sensibilities without pushing beyond them, reminding modern
listeners of a vanished world of elegance and style, and of emotions portrayed
musically only so deeply and no further.
On the face of it, there is
nothing especially unusual about yet another recording of Bach’s organ music,
not even one ambitiously designated the first volume of
The Bach Project. Most of the works performed by Todd Fickley on a
new MSR Classics release are ones with which listeners will be familiar:
Toccata, Adagio & Fugue in C, BWV 564;
An Wasserflüssen Babylon, BWV 653; Trio Sonata No. 1, BWV 525; Prelude and
Fugue in A minor, BWV 543; Partite Diverse Sopra il Corale “Sei Gegrüsset,
Jesu, Gütig,” BWV 768; and
Passacaglia
in C minor, BWV 582. Also on the face of it, Fickley’s choice of an organ
on which to perform is unexceptionable and intelligent. But the superficial
“just another fine recording of Bach’s organ music” response to this release is
misplaced, because in fact the CD is a showcase for “virtual pipe organ”
software called
Hauptwerk. A visit to
www.hauptwerk.com is worthwhile for
anyone considering purchase of this disc, because the software itself is
fascinating and its concept unusual enough to merit some serious thought about
the differences between real pipe organs and digital keyboards that reproduce
organ sounds. That reproduction is frequently, to put it bluntly, awful. The
ease of use of a readily portable digital keyboard is inarguable, and for many
people, the difference in sound between what such a keyboard generates and what
pipe organs produce is meaningless when it comes to typical hymns and other
church music – the main pieces with which many people associate organs and the
primary ones for which organs are nowadays used. Great organ music, however –
whether by Bach or such other towering figures as Widor and Vierne – always
sounds constricted and compromised when performed on a typical digital organ.
Hauptwerk intends to change that by a
complex and well-thought-out sampling technique designed to mimic, in great
detail, the exact sound of specific great organs of the world. So what Fickley
plays on here is not actually the 1721 Dutch organ located in St. Micha
ëlskerk, Zwolle – it is the
Hauptwerk version of that organ, created
digitally and reproduced through a modern electronic instrument. On a strictly
musical basis, Fickley’s performances are fine, historically aware although not
imbued with all elements of historic performance practices. The actual sound of
the music is fine as well, and largely indistinguishable from the sound of a
pipe organ (only listeners who really know the specific one sampled here by
Hauptwerk will be able to judge how well
its sound is reproduced). The whole project raises some intriguing questions,
though. Old organs, no matter how often updated and how well maintained, have
inevitable quirks, reflected in clicks, balky responses, extraneous noises, and
other odd little operating sounds.
Hauptwerk
eliminate all of these: it samples, very accurately, the exact sound made by an
organ’s pipes, but not the organist’s technique in
eliciting those sounds. Indeed, the whole notion is to let modern
organists, wherever located, employ their technique on virtual copies of great
organs located somewhere else. But is the absence of old instruments’
age-related elements a good thing? Do the difficulties of playing the old pipe
organs make them sound better or worse? Do those difficulties produce a
more-authentic listening experience, or one with which extraneous elements
constantly interfere? A listener’s response to these philosophical questions
will have a great deal to do with his or her enjoyment of, or disappointment
in, Fickley’s
Hauptwerk recording.
There are no electronic instrumental
elements involved in another MSR Classics release, this one featuring Ensemble
Schumann – but there are other unusual things about it, including the
repertoire and some instrumental choices. The latter are germane to the
ensemble’s recording of Schumann’s late (1853) Märchenerzählungen, a four-movement work
for clarinet or violin, viola and piano. The choice of an oboe rather than
Schumann’s designated instruments significantly changes the character of some
aspects of this music. The oboe is less suited than the clarinet to the
ominous, dark opening and other elements of the second movement, and the viola-oboe
duet of the third movement is less effective than one involving viola and clarinet.
To be sure, it could be argued that choosing Schumann’s option of a violin also
alters the character of these sections, but Schumann was aware of the
differences that would result and clearly approved them. Using an oboe, even
when it is played as well as it is here by Thomas Gallant, results in tonal
colors than the composer did not anticipate but could surely have called for
had he wanted them. Gallant, Steve Larson and Sally Pinkas do perform very well
together, and the lyricism, grace and rhythmic drive of Märchenerzählungen come through well, even
if the overall sound of the piece is somewhat strange. The other works on this
CD are far less frequently heard, and some listeners will not know their
composers at all. Deux Rhapsodies by
violinist-composer Charles Martin Loeffler (1861-1935) dates to 1901 and bears
the intriguing titles L’Étang
(“The Pond”) and La Cornemuse
(“Bagpipes”), and Loeffler – a careful and methodical composer, if not an
especially inspired one – presents some effective tone painting in both. Schilflieder (“Reed Songs”) by August
Klughardt (1847-1902) is an earlier work, written in 1872, with more of
Romanticism and less of Impressionism about it. Klughardt called the five
movements Phantasiestüke
(“Imaginative Pieces”) and wrote them for piano, oboe or violin, and viola.
They are based on poems by Nikolaus Lenau (1802-1850) and are suitably reflective
of multiple moods: the atmosphere of Lenau’s poems comes through clearly even
without a listener knowing their specifics. The final work on this disc is the Serenade in F minor by Robert Kahn
(1865-1951), and it is perhaps the most historically fascinating piece here,
for all that it is the shortest and is very little known. Although it dates to
1922, it is written in an essentially Brahmsian style (Kahn knew Brahms, who
was so impressed with the younger composer that he offered to tutor him and did
help him informally). Kahn’s is a well-crafted work, not terribly deep but
elegant and genial. It is in a single continuous movement that breaks down into
a relaxed first part and a moderately fast second one, each with its own
contrasting middle section. What is fascinating is that when Kahn brought the
work to his publisher, it was as a trio for oboe, horn and piano – and the
publisher, Simrock, said it would barely sell in that form and needed to be
rewritten for a standard piano trio (with violin and cello). That would have created
two versions – but Kahn went overboard and ended up arranging the work for nine performance combinations: piano
with oboe, violin, clarinet or viola; plus horn, viola or cello. The
oboe/viola/piano version heard here serves the music well, bringing forth the
contrasts within the parts (especially the Vivace
section in the first part) and perhaps making listeners wonder if anyone would
care to release a CD containing all
the versions of this work. But Simrock would no doubt observe that it would probably
barely sell.
The instrumental
combinations are of a strictly Baroque cast in the very impressive Juilliard
Baroque performance of François
Couperin’s Les Nations, a set of four
extended and elaborate works devoted to the major Catholic powers of Europe in
Couperin’s time (1668-1733). The four are intended to represent France, Spain,
the Holy Roman Empire and the Savoy dynasty of Piedmont, but in fact their
elements are solely French and Italian (in the dance movements, more the former
than the latter) and, not surprisingly, often sound Corellian: Couperin
acknowledged his debt to Corelli and in fact introduced Corelli’s Trio Sonata
form to France. Each part of Les Nations
includes one of those trio sonatas, followed by a dance suite, and each part is
scored simply for two violins and continuo. But Les Nations is rarely performed that way: Couperin is known to have
had access to a variety of chamber musicians at the court of Louis XIV, so
modern performances – including this one – frequently fill out the bare bones
of Les Nations with instruments such
as those heard here. The result is a more-colorful performance that is arguably
just as authentic as one simply using violins and continuo. Certainly the Juilliard
Baroque musicians sound excellent on this Naxos release, playing individual
movements with style and finesse and providing fullness that is actually lush
when appropriate, as for instance in the chaconne of L’Impériale. Many movements are short, and at times the quick
transitions from instrument to instrument can prevent the creation of a unified
mood. Taken as a whole, though, this recording of Les Nations uses its instrumental mixture very well, producing a
performance that is historically informed, nicely paced, very well played, and
quite interesting to hear even some 300 years after Couperin’s original was
published in 1726.