Hugo Alfvén: Festspel; Gustav II Adolf—Suite for Orchestra; Einojuhani Rautavaara: Cantus arcticus. Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra conducted by Neeme Järvi. Chandos. $21.99 (SACD).
Take a step beyond Sibelius, Nielsen and Grieg and you encounter a host of Scandinavian composers whose comparative neglect is exceedingly difficult to fathom. From Franz Berwald, Niels Gade and Wilhelm Stenhammar to the late Per Nørgård, composers of intelligence, sensitivity and emotional depth continue to be heard far less often than is warranted based on the quality of their music. That makes the occasional forays into their works in recorded form all the more welcome, especially when they are advocated by performers as accomplished and engaged as the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra conducted by Neeme Järvi – and even more so when recordings offer sound quality as fine as that on a new Chandos SACD focusing on Hugo Alfvén and Einojuhani Rautavaara.
On the face of it, this is a curious combination of music, made even more so by the disc’s sequence, which places a Rautavaara work between two by Alfvén. Furthermore, these are very different composers, from different countries and time periods: Alfvén (1872-1960) was Swedish, Rautavaara (1928-2016) Finnish. And the music here is more notable for its points of difference than for any elements of similarity. Nevertheless, what comes across most clearly in this recording is just how worthwhile the works are and how mystifying it is that music of this quality is not heard more often outside Scandinavia itself – and, in truth, not all that frequently there, either.
Both Alfvén and Rautavaara lived most of their lives in the 20th century, and all three works on this disc are 20th-century ones, but these composers absorbed and engaged in the time period very differently. Alfvén was largely Romantic or neo-Romantic in approach, his two works played here resting comfortably in an essentially tonal environment and encompassing a thoroughly appropriate set of emotions and orchestral displays – indeed, Alfvén’s handling of large orchestral forces is exemplary throughout his music. Festspel (“Festival Play”), written in 1907, sounds like a proclamatory overture, and in that sense fulfills its mission admirably: it was produced to celebrate a newly opened building for the Royal Dramatic Theatre in Stockholm. Filled with brass and including a deftly scored polonaise, Festspel mixes celebratory elements with lyrical ones to fine effect, and would not be out of place introducing a suitably dramatic stage work. Gustav II Adolf actually is a stage work, for which Alfvén wrote incidental music in 1932. The eight-movement suite from what is essentially a history play is colorful, varied and very adeptly scored. The play’s focus is the Thirty Years War, near the end of which, in 1632, Sweden’s much-admired king died in battle at the age of 37. Alfvén’s music ranges from the prayerful to the deeply emotional to the martial, encompassing portraits not only of Sweden’s monarch but also of his main enemy. Alfvén shows himself a master of old forms, including the sarabande and minuet, as well as a clever interpreter of such dances: he includes a delightfully light bourrée for three bassoons. The battle scene that ends the suite and is its longest movement builds effectively throughout, and the overall impression of the music is one of drama, intensity, and sensitivity to multiple moods and forms of expression.
The expressiveness of Rautavaara is of another sort and on another level altogether. Although he was never a dedicated follower of avant-garde musical trends, Rautavaara incorporated far more unusual approaches into his music than Alfvén brought into his. Rautavaara’s Cantus arcticus (1972) is designated “Concerto for Birds and Orchestra” and was written for a university graduation ceremony – a “stage” rather different from those for which the two Alfvén pieces heard here were produced. Rautavaara’s “birds” title is quite literal and shows his willingness to think of music in ways beyond the typical: the concerto incorporates two-channel recordings of birdsong in all three movements, and the orchestral elements – although generally tonal – highlight the birdsong and are built around it. Rautavaara was quite specific about the pacing of this work: he gives note-value indications for every section of every movement. And he offered clear auditory guidance for the first movement: “Think of autumn and of Tchaikovsky.” None of these touches forecloses interpretative niceties, however, and Järvi and the orchestra are as attuned to the flow of Rautavaara’s music as they are to the pacing and balance of Alfvén’s. The Rautavaara work includes tapes of wild cranes in the first movement, larks in the second, and swans in the third – this last mildly reminiscent of Sibelius, for whom a flight of swans provided inspiration for the finale of his Symphony No. 5. Rautavaara incorporates the recorded birdsong systematically and cleverly into the orchestral texture of all three movements, bringing it in softly and gradually in the first movement before making it increasingly prominent, using it to open the second and third movements, and eventually melding it with complex orchestral textures as the concerto develops toward its conclusion. Rautavaara’s handling of the orchestra is quite different from Alfvén’s, less sumptuous and more transparent, showing just how differently these two composers conceived compositions for a full-scale ensemble. Järvi’s understanding of all the music on this disc is thorough, the pacing and the orchestral balance are idiomatic and well-executed, and even though these particular pieces fit together rather oddly when heard in juxtaposition, they demonstrate conclusively that both Alfvén and Rautavaara are composers with a great deal to communicate and a great deal of skill in putting their musical ideas across. Both deserve to be heard with considerably greater frequency, especially in performances as full of skill and thoughtfulness as these.