Sibelius:
Symphonies Nos. 2 and 5. London
Symphony Orchestra conducted by Colin Davis. Alto. $10.98.
Lost
American Violin Sonatas, Volume 1. Solomia
Soroka, violin; Arthur Greene and Phillip Silver, piano. Toccata Next. $18.99.
Daniel
Schnyder: Concerto for Cello, Percussion & String Orchestra; Concerto
Populaire; Ad Aeternam; Jazz Sonata for Cello & Piano; Cello BLU; CUBAC
(for 8 cellos); Karachi (for cello, soprano saxophone, percussion & string
orchestra). Christoph Croisé, cello;
Ruven Ruppik, percussion; Daniel Schnyder, soprano saxophone; Beyond Modern
Orchestra; Alexander Panfilov, piano; Peter Gorobets, harpsichord; Swiss Cello
Octet. AVIE. $19.99.
The social-media notion of “influencers” is nothing but an update – with
overriding commercial implications – of the longstanding practice of people
being influenced by the past, interpreting and reinterpreting it, and in their
turn influencing others. Another word for this sort of influencing is simply
“progress.” And this is how art of many types, certainly including music,
develops into new forms and approaches. Sibelius, for example, was heavily
influenced by Tchaikovsky in his early large-scale works, notably including his
Symphony No. 1. But by Symphony No. 2, Sibelius had started to pick and choose
among elements of the Tchaikovskian sound world and had begun moving toward symphonic
forms that reflected a Nordic sensibility and also approached symphonic
structure from some intriguing new angles. Thus, if Symphony No. 1, for all the
beauties of its themes and elegance of its structure, is largely a derivative
work, Symphony No. 2 shows Sibelius beginning to strike out on his own path,
one that involves rethinking elements of symphonic form itself. Symphony No. 2
certainly includes a measure of Tchaikovskian introspection – Sibelius at one
point said it was “a confession of the soul” – but it is scarcely
self-indulgent, much of the entire work being carefully derived and expanded
from the three-note theme that opens the first movement. Cleverness abounds in
the symphony, for instance in Sibelius’ holding back of the full first-movement
theme until the very end of the movement. There is a sense of the symphony
being assembled as it goes along, of it building inevitably toward the
grandiose finale that, when the symphony was first heard, was picked up as a
musical rallying cry for Finnish independence at a time when Russia was
cracking down on many elements of Finnish culture. Colin Davis’ 2006 recording
with the London Symphony Orchestra, now re-released on the Alto label, has
sweep and power throughout, and Davis clearly perceives and sustains a sense of
the symphony building more and more power and cohesion as it progresses until
the final movement blazes forth in triumph. It is a well-paced, well-considered
and thoroughly convincing reading of the symphony – and is paired with an
equally impressive performance, from 2003, of Symphony No. 5. A significantly
shorter and less portentous work, whose final version (1919) is in just three
movements, Symphony No. 5 is a bit of a throwback after the more-modernist No.
4 (although the first version of No. 5 was actually closer to the world of its
predecessor). Symphony No. 5, as we have it today, is less innovative than No. 2
and in many ways reflects the composer’s newfound determination to stay largely
within the harmonic confines of late Romanticism rather than press on into the
various 20th-century post-Romantic approaches to large-scale works.
Interestingly – and Davis is quite adept at showing this – the shorter No. 5
seems to operate on a larger scale than No. 2, its very broad themes and
consistency of orchestration and instrumental color lending the work a sense of
being tight-knit throughout. Superb instrumental touches such as the
final-movement theme inspired, Sibelius said, by a flight of cranes, are
combined with some unusual rhythmic elements – notably at the work’s very end –
to produce a cohesive impression of beauty and grandeur that seems very much
attuned to the grandeurs of northern climes, even though Sibelius intended no
such overtly Impressionistic tie-in.
On the other side of the Atlantic in Sibelius’ time, classical music in
the United States was barely beginning to find its way. It was a time of open-air
bands (Sousa’s being by far the most notable) rather than concert halls, a time
when tremendously innovative composers such as Charles Ives were picking their
way through bits of Americana, touches of European classical material, and many
elements that were entirely outside the purview of what we now think of as
“serious” music. But it was also a time when American composers were determined
to absorb the best possible influences from European Romanticism, and
specifically from the German school. The result was the creation of numerous
exceptionally well-made but now totally obscure pieces steeped in German
Romanticism but providing, here and there, hints of thematic and rhythmic
material associated with the New World. A fascinating first-in-a-planned-series
Toccata Next recording that offers world premières of three violin sonatas by
entirely obscure American composers provides a fascinating entry point to the
world of American classical music at a time when it was struggling to find its
voice and move beyond its models – in some ways mirroring Sibelius’ efforts an
ocean away. The composers here are as thoroughly unfamiliar as the specific
works offered: Rossetter Gleason Cole (1866-1952), Henry Holden Huss
(1862-1953), and Henry Schoenefeld (1857-1936). Those dates are interesting:
Sibelius lived from 1865 to 1957, although he produced little in his final
several decades – so he and these three Americans were essentially
contemporaries. However, there are few glimmers of originality, minimal attempts
to incorporate new elements into the solidly (and stolidly) Romantic world of
the three violin sonatas that Solomia Soroka performs (Cole’s with her husband,
Arthur Greene, on piano, the others with pianist Phillip Silver). The exact
dates of composition of the three sonatas are unknown, but their Romantic
provenance is clear from the start of each one – and throughout all of them.
All have a Brahmsian glow, a warmth and elegance of line that make them very
pleasant to hear although less so to re-hear:
they are scarcely insubstantial, but what they want to communicate comes
through clearly enough on a first hearing so that there is little beyond
surface-level beauty to be extracted from them on subsequent listenings. Cole’s
four-movement work, published in 1917, is the most-substantial of the three
sonatas, its four well-balanced movements having touches of Americana here and
there, its overall sound such that it makes perfect sense for the work to have
been dedicated by Cole to Max Bruch. The three-movement Huss sonata, which
dates to about 1894, contains contrasting elements of strength and lyricism
within an overall meditative and rather melancholy feel. It is not a study
piece, but it sounds a bit like one, with everything in its place but nothing
particularly innovative or unexpected thematically, harmonically or
emotionally. Schoenefeld’s three-movement sonata, published in 1903, is marked Sonate quasi Fantasia and does have a
sense of fantasy about it. It is a virtuosic work mixing drama with expressiveness,
intensity with gentle flow, and the concluding Vivace in rondo form gives Soroka plenty of chances to put her
technical abilities on display. All these works are worthwhile for the light
they shed on a particular period in American classical music-making, and all
are notable for showing the extent to which serious American composers of this
time period were beholden to the German Romantic compositional and performance
traditions – and were expert at learning and absorbing them, although reluctant
to push beyond their boundaries.
In contemporary classical music, by contrast, influences of all sorts
abound, and it sometimes seems that whatever historical precedent there may be
for a particular work is of less importance to composers than whatever
non-traditional elements they can attach to it. That is true even for composers
adept in classical forms, such as Daniel Schnyder (born 1961; pronounced
SHNEE-der). A new AVIE disc features cellist Christoph Croisé (himself a
composer as well as a performer) in two large-scale works that he commissioned:
Concerto for Cello, Percussion &
String Orchestra and Concerto
Populaire. Each of these three-movement pieces, respectively from 2021 and
2023, adheres to standard movement arrangements in theory and to more-or-less
standard contemporary sound in practice. Middle Eastern melodies and rhythms
mix with Latin American sounds in the Concerto
for Cello, Percussion & String Orchestra, in which Schnyder – unusually
for a modern composer – actually plays to the strengths of the cello,
specifically its warmth and depth, part of the time (primarily in the second
movement). Unsurprisingly, the percussion plays a considerable role in the
work, but it is generally well-integrated with the rest of the ensemble and
does not seem to be used purely for effect – although all the players, on all
instruments, certainly get a workout in the finale. Concerto Populaire is for soprano saxophone, cello, percussion and
string orchestra, and it too goes out of its way to avoid sounding too
“European,” much less in the Germanic tradition: the Middle East, Latin
America, and Africa peer through again and again. The work is cut from much the
same cloth as the Concerto for Cello,
Percussion & String Orchestra, but the prominence of the soprano
saxophone – adeptly played by the composer – lends it an aural flavor that
differs to some extent, even though the influences on the two concertos are
largely duplicative. The five remaining works on this very-well-recorded CD are
shorter and make less of an attempt to communicate on multiple levels. Ad Aeternam, whose première Croisé gave
in 2017, is a memorial and tribute to the late cellist Daniel Pezzotti; it is
suitably elegant and sad if perhaps a bit formulaic in its expression of sorrow.
The one-movement Jazz Sonata for Cello
& Piano is, unsurprisingly in light of its title, a blend of jazz and
traditional classical material, and while the instrumental balance is effective
enough, the work seems more gestural than genuinely heartfelt. Cello BLU, another Croisé commission,
would be expected to be fascinating for using the cello with a harpsichord
rather than piano. But the musical blending here, as in other Schnyder works,
is pretty much standard stuff: a bit of Gospel here, some R&B there, a
sense of “the blues” from time to time (hence the title), but ultimately a
less-than-fully-successful attempt to unite and contrast the two instruments. CUBAC is more interesting: originally
written for brass ensemble, it is here played on eight cellos, and as its title
more-or-less indicates, it includes elements of Cuban music contrasted with
material taken, or more accurately developed, in the manner of Bach. The
persistent dissonance is somewhat overdone and is on the verge of becoming
almost unpleasant by the end of the piece, but escapes that fate by virtue of
spinning nearly out of control to a highly dynamic conclusion. Finally, Karachi appears as a three-minute encore
to the disc: it is the fourth movement from Schnyder’s Nay Concerto, the title referring to a Middle Eastern bamboo flute.
Rearranged for this recording, the piece is suitably bouncy and bright enough to
make an enjoyable encore, and sufficiently close spiritually to the blending of
various musical styles elsewhere on the CD so that it makes an effective
closer. Ultimately, this (+++) CD nicely explores Schnyder’s propensity for
specific types of rhythmic, harmonic and instrumental blending and contrast,
with the two multi-movement concertos offering the greatest aural variety and
the remaining pieces showing how Schnyder enjoys turning again and again to
musical sources beyond the largely European ones that are traditionally thought
of as the foundations of classical music.