December 15, 2016

(++++) CARTOON TIME WELL SPENT


Extra Cheesy Zits: A “Zits” Treasury. By Jerry Scott and Jim Borgman. Andrews McMeel. $18.99.

Year of Yesh: A “Mutts” Treasury. By Patrick McDonnell. Andrews McMeel. $19.99.

     Consider, for a moment, the complexities of time, comic-strip style. One classic Sunday strip in the late Richard Thompson’s much-loved Cul de Sac had older brother Petey trying to explain comics to younger sister Alice. She was convinced that the cat in later panels was angry at the one in earlier panels, and Petey simply could not get her to see that it was the same cat, with the panels representing progress in time. There is, indeed, no instinctive human realization of how comic strips work: it has to be learned, perhaps between Alice’s age (four) and Petey’s (eight), or perhaps at some later time. The best cartoonists have so strong an understanding of comic-strip time that they can play with it, even to the point of having different characters in the same strip operating in different time schemes (you have to see that sort of thing to believe it: S. Clay Wilson had one notorious sequence of that type in an underground comic, involving a demon and two humans).

     Now consider the reality that the concept of “time” means different things for teenagers than it does for many comic-strip readers, and you have a recipe for some amazing time expansion, contraction and confusion – and a source for humor of all types. Jerry Scott (writer) and Jim Borgman (artist) are absolute masters of time manipulation and understanding in Zits. They know that the circadian rhythms of teenagers, such as Jeremy Duncan and his friends, are as different as they can be from those of Jeremy’s parents, Walt and Connie, and other hapless and feckless adults. Partly as a result, Zits is a strip that invites readers to spend more time with each sequence than is usual with comics, many of which can literally be read in seconds. Try that with Zits and you will often miss the point. For example, in Extra Cheesy Zits, the latest “Treasury” collection (with commentary by Scott and Borgman), Connie wonders if Jeremy would like his shirt washed, since he has been wearing it for a month. No, he says: “It doesn’t offend me yet.” And Jeremy calls his parents to explain that he’s finished at the movie and will now be staying at friend Hector’s house for a while to binge-watch Game of Thrones and play “Halo,” so obviously the evening is just getting started – while we see Walt getting ready for bed and Connie already asleep. Aside from the clear difference of time sense between parents and teens, there is a lot to see in these panels, which is why the reader’s time comes into the equation as well. Skim the night-just-getting-started strip too quickly, for instance, and you may miss the details of just what Walt does to get ready for sleep. And definitely do not skim the one in which Jeremy and girlfriend Sara almost have an argument about a movie they have just seen – until Jeremy, realizing that Sara is about to blow up (Borgman has given her a grenade head, out of which the pin has just popped), thinks quickly and rescues the situation by revising his interpretation (and putting the pin back into the grenade, which turns back into Sara’s head). Obviously differences of time perception are not the only source of conflict and amusement in Zits. There are other, equally hilarious perceptual differences, like the one responsible for an amazing diagonally laid out strip in which Walt and Connie are rolling Jeremy’s huge head up a slope, only to have it roll back down right over them as he explains that the water bill may be high because he “fell asleep in the shower again.” This leads Walt to wonder whether Sisyphus had a son, and Borgman to comment beneath the strip, “Every twenty years or so we like to do a strip just for the Greek majors.” Matters of perception are a kind of stock-in-trade for Jeremy and, by extension, teenagers in general, and he and they will use them for their own purposes – as when Jeremy says he will not mow the lawn because “our gas-powered mower will increase my carbon footprint, and my morals simply won’t allow it.” Walt points out reasonably (reasonably to an adult, anyway) that Jeremy just drove his van to the mailbox, and Jeremy explains, “My morals are task-specific.” Ah, yes. Everything is a matter of perception, and time lies at the center of so much. One strip in Extra Cheesy Zits encapsulates this neatly in just two panels. Connie asks Jeremy if he plans to do anything today, and he says, “This is my down-time.” She asks if he doesn’t “need to have some up-time before you can have down-time,” and Jeremy responds, “Not at my level of experience.” There you have Zits in a nutshell, or a driving-parents-nuts-shell. Readers’ time used to peruse and examine Zits is always very well spent indeed.

     The complexity of the story lines and visual images in Zits contrasts strongly with the simplicity of design and tale-telling in Mutts, at least at first glance. Patrick McDonnell’s strips can often be read in a matter of moments, and there is a childlike quality to their themes and art that is immediately appealing and does not requires introspection – again, at first glance. But Mutts operates on two levels. There is the surface warmth and simplicity that make the strip quite suitable for children and give it a veneer of bright, homey amusement. But there is also the level of strong animal advocacy, particularly the “Shelter Stories” segments, in which all sorts of animals are saved and given a full life by caring human beings who adopt them; the strips warning about the imminent disappearance of various endangered species; and, artistically, a remarkably high level of drawing skill that takes off from fine art as well as a thorough knowledge of and understanding of the comic-strip medium itself. McDonnell does not really poke fun, even gently, at earlier strips – he adopts and adapts them to the world of Mutts with gentle, sometimes wry understanding, as when he changes Otto Soglow’s “The Little King” into a series called “The Little Cat King,” a perfect way to describe cats in general and Mooch in particular. The central characters here – Mooch and his dog pal, Earl – are a marvelous blend of the realistic and the imaginary. They may talk to each other and have adventures together and with other animals, but they do not speak to the humans in the strip, and as far as human beings go, they retain standard animal characteristics: Mooch snubs his food and plays obsessively with his “little pink sock,” while Earl gobbles his meals in an instant and goes into paroxysms of joy whenever his human companion, Ozzie, comes home. McDonnell’s strip is a constant balancing act, and his tightrope skill is amazing. “Yesh” is the way Mooch says “Yes,” and this is a speech characteristic, not a speech impediment, with the result that it is all the more endearing. Year of Yesh includes, yesh…err, yes…a full year of Mutts strips, giving readers a chance to follow McDonnell’s characters, and his art, through weather of all sorts and events of all types. McDonnell is fond of multi-strip series devoted to specific occasions: six of them, each a large rectangular single panel, containing quotations about spring; a cleverly designed six-panel Sunday entry for Earth Day that starts with “my yard” and gradually widens out to “my home” (Earth as seen from space); an exceptionally touching, beautifully drawn and very big single Sunday panel for Mother’s Day; and many more. McDonnell regularly pays visits to Coconino County of Krazy Kat fame, and the many sequences in which squirrels Bip and Bop “bean” other animals, and people, with acorns, are directly derived from George Herriman’s masterful strip – a fact made particularly clear in this collection by a strip in which Mooch gets “bonked” and Earl strikes an Offissa Pupp pose while imagining the squirrel in jail. And then there are the recurring just-for-fun sequences, such as “Dear Diary” entries for Mooch and Earl. And there are gentle and gently silly “tribute” strips, such as a sequence in which Dennis the Menace, Charlie Brown, Little Orphan Annie and other classic characters get bopped by acorns – plus a Sunday offering in which McDonnell beautifully and very amusingly reinterprets the classic cover from 1938 of the very first Action Comics edition featuring Superman. Mutts is a strip with which it is possible to spend a very short amount of time to “get” the basic gag each day, and one on which it is equally possible to dwell for a very extended period indeed to savor the quality of the art, the nuances of the writing, and the uniformly loving impulses that equally underlie the overt advocacy strips and the ones that “merely” show a world that is recognizably ours, but better. This is, yesh, marvelous storytelling and characterization that just happen to occur in comic-strip format.

(++++) THOUGHTS OF ANIMALS


Beastly Brains: Exploring How Animals Think, Talk, and Feel. By Nancy F. Castaldo. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. $16.99.

What if You Had an Animal Nose!? By Sandra Markle. Illustrated by Howard McWilliam. Scholastic. $4.99.

     Anyone who still believes that humans are not animals will have a hard time with Nancy F. Castaldo’s Beastly Brains, because this eye-opener of a book shows so many animals with so many characteristics that we think of as “human” that the uniqueness of our species becomes harder and harder to define. Humans are unique, make no mistake – but so, in their own way, are many, many other animals; in fact, ecological-niche studies would argue that every single species is and must be unique, since two identical species competing for the exact same niche would inevitably come into ongoing conflict until one disappeared. Such as, say, Neanderthals. There are no lofty anthropological analyses in Castaldo’s book, although there is a smattering of philosophical thinking that invites readers to consider, at even more length, just what the differences are between people and other species inhabiting Earth. The sophistication of animal perception is truly astounding. Take Castaldo’s chapter called “Fairness.” Here she recounts amazing experiments that demonstrate quite clearly that dogs and monkeys feel jealousy. For example, one dog that willingly gave a researcher its paw when asked stopped doing so when the researcher asked another dog for its paw and gave it a treat each time – not offering one to the first dog, which soon began to whimper when asked for its paw and then looked away and stopped giving the paw altogether. How far does this sort of canine thinking go? As Castaldo says, “Jealousy and justice are very close,” and dogs will quickly notice a human who shows favoritism to some over others. The same chapter’s discussion of monkeys goes even further: a study found that when different monkeys were given unequal treats for the same action of handing stones to researchers, “some monkeys receiving the [better treats] would stop giving the stones in protest of the monkey who wasn’t being treated fairly.” That implies empathy – the ability to feel what another is feeling – or, at the very least, a finely honed sense of “right” and “wrong” and even of ethics. This is heady material for a short (152-page) book intended for younger readers – and there is even more in Beastly Brains. Emotions, communication, problem solving – all are here, and all may seem somewhat apparent to readers. But what about animal self-awareness? Most animals ignore mirrors or, if they notice them, think the mirror image is another of their own kind. But dolphins and apes recognize themselves in mirrors, and enact many of the same behaviors that we humans do in showing awareness that the mirror images are in fact images, not other people. It turns out that elephants are self-aware, too: an intriguing experiment showed that, because an elephant with a painted mark on her forehead that she could only see in a mirror touched her own forehead to rub the mark when she saw it – she did not touch the reflection. Other animals also seem to have the ability to recognize themselves in mirrors: magpies have big brains for their body size, and at least some of these birds appear to have self-recognition. Beastly Brains raises as many questions as it answers, including some at the end about human obligations toward animals that, we now know, share many human cognitive abilities. This is a book to make young readers think, as well as one to explain the thinking abilities of many other animals.

     Whatever their thinking skills may be, nonhuman animals have some characteristics that give them abilities far beyond those of people. Sandra Markle and Howard McWilliam are exploring some such abilities in a series of amusing – but factually accurate – books, in each of which Markle discusses how humans would react to having a certain animal characteristic, and McWilliam amusingly shows what the hybrid creatures would look like and what they could do. The latest of these books, all of which come complete with exclamatory-and-questioning punctuation in their titles, is What if You Had an Animal Nose!? An elephant’s trunk obviously belongs here, and duly appears, with the intriguing note that the trunk can pull in as much as two gallons of water at a time and has a tip so sensitive that it can pick up a single peanut. Even more interesting are some of the less-noted noses of the animal kingdom. A tapir’s proboscis, for instance, is joined with its upper lip and can bend and move in all directions – a child with one of those could use it to, for instance, “catch a home-run ball, even with your hands full,” as McWilliam’s amusing illustration of the stands at a ballpark shows. And a grizzly bear’s nose has smell-sensing areas 100 times bigger than a human’s, so a child with one of them “could sniff out all [his or her] favorite goodies and only trick-or-treat at the best houses!” As in earlier entries in this series, the end pages of this book are the most overtly informative and thus, unfortunately, the least interesting: they show how human noses work and explain how to keep them healthy. This more-direct, more-focused educational portion of What if You Had an Animal Nose!? is certainly useful, but because it is so straightforward, kids may just skip it. Even then, though, they will have learned something about the special characteristics of some animals’ noses – and perhaps their curiosity about their own will kick in at a later time, encouraged and guided by information and illustrations that show why human noses fit humans just as well as other animals’ noses fit them.

(++++) OFFBEAT AND SORT OF SWEET


Pig the Pug. By Aaron Blabey. Scholastic. $14.99.

Robert Pizzo’s Industrial Strength Coloring Book. By Robert Pizzo. Quill Driver Books. $12.95.

     If you are looking for a last-minute holiday gift for someone, adult or child, who sees things a bit differently from the way everyone else sees them, here are a couple of excellent possibilities. “Seeing” is what the cover of Pig the Pug is all about: Aaron Blabey shows the dog’s face in extreme close-up, his huge eyes looking in two slightly different directions, his muzzle seeming for all the world like a jowly scowl. Pugs really do look something like this, but Blabey’s exaggeration makes Pig realer than real. Open the book, and on the inside front cover is a built-in bookplate that says “This book belongs to,” after which someone has scrawled “PIG.” And right there is the book’s theme, even before the first page of the story. Pig, first seen in the story pages sitting on his rump with his legs curled protectively around his very full food dish, is “greedy and selfish/ in most every way,” hogging all his toys and being exceedingly nasty – but, oddly, rather adorable about it – to the other family pet, “a wiener dog, Trevor.” Despite the dachshund’s valiant attempts to get Pig to play together, all that happens is that “Pig flipped his wig” – he goes into a hysterically funny tantrum, with eyes popping out of his head (and eyeballs contracting to pinheads), as he tosses his toys all over: “I know what your game is,/ you want me to SHARE!/ But I’ll never do that!/ I WON’T and I SWEAR.” Clearly Pig is heading for a fall – which is just what he gets. To keep Trevor from sharing anything, Pig piles all his toys up and stands triumphantly on top of them, not realizing that the toy pile is in front of an open window. Uh-oh. The next two-page illustration shows the outside of a building with a certain pug heading directly down (his head and therefore his expression not visible, but certainly imaginable); the only words are, “Well, pugs cannot fly.” Serves him right? But Pig is adorable despite being a grump, grouch and Grinch, and of course Blabey cannot leave him down on the ground below the window. So the scene switches to one of Trevor playing happily, because “Pig shares his toys now,/ and Trevor’s his friend.” Why the turnaround, with Trevor happily resting atop Pig’s still-grumpy-looking head? The last page shows that “Pig’s on the mend” in a full body cast – looking delightfully bewildered as Trevor smiles happily at him. Pig the Pug will not work for a child who finds it scary to imagine a dog, even a piggish one, falling and being injured, or one who fails to respond to the oddities and exaggerations of the story and the drawings. But a child who finds strange and unusual approaches to everyday children’s-book themes about friendship and sharing amusing will laugh out loud, repeatedly, at this piggish (and Trevor-ish) adventure.

     Over on the adult side of things, coloring books, originally for children, are all the rage these days, intended to help grown-ups relax, connect with their inner artist, enjoy nature and animals, and find peace and contentment. Except, that is, for Robert Pizzo’s Industrial Strength Coloring Book. Pizzo is a first-rate artist and designer of works for both adults and kids – for the latter, his 2013 The Amazing Animal Alphabet of Twenty-Six Tongue Twisters remains a one-of-a-kind foray into the intricacies of language. His new coloring book is one of a kind, too. Yes, it has the expected design elements: intricate black-and-white drawings on pages perforated for easy removal before or after they have been given a suitably splendid rainbow of hues. But the topics of the to-be-colored pages are quite unlike those in other coloring books for adults. One page shows two figures, apparently factory workers, standing at a table above which are 21 compartments containing different types of fasteners. One features an intricate array of plumbing elements – unconnected pipes and various possible ways to connect them. One is a highly stylized conveyor-belt-and-forklift scene, featuring boxes moving neatly in the direction of the arrows shown prominently on their tops. One shows a busy airport baggage-claim area, with luggage flowing out to waiting people, baggage handlers with carts, signs to various forms of ground transportation, a security guard giving directions – it is a sort of color-your-own-airport-milieu scene. Another page shows some log-carrying trucks being loaded and others driving off. Still another features two package-delivery trucks, facing in opposite directions, plus drivers and unloaders and the people to whom the packages are being brought. There is a farm page, and a page showing an architect’s drawing tools, and a page of various types of light bulbs, and several pages with manhole covers in the center (some blank, one saying “Stormdrain,” another saying “N.Y.C.” and yet another saying “Electric Co.”) and various designs around the edges. Do not look for re-connection with a quieter, simpler world or with nature in Robert Pizzo’s Industrial Strength Coloring Book. Look instead for an affirmation of the attraction, if not conventional beauty, of human endeavor – in factories, farms and cities, at sea and on railroad tracks, in a bottling plant and at an automotive assembly line. At a time when the hard-edged STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) are being increasingly emphasized in schools and the workplace, Pizzo here provides a rare chance to soften and warm up what is essentially a cold and seemingly heartless world. Clearly not for everyone, Robert Pizzo’s Industrial Strength Coloring Book is a great choice for someone looking to express artistry in unexpected ways and unexpected settings – which, come to think of it, neatly describes Pizzo himself.

(+++) STUDIES IN CONTRAST


Gilbert and Sullivan: HMS Pinafore. Tim Brooke-Taylor, narrator; John Mark Ainsley, Elizabeth Watts, Toby Spence, Hilary Summers, Neal Davies, Andrew Foster-Williams, Gavan Ring, Barnaby Rea, Kitty Whately; Scottish Opera conducted by Richard Egarr. Linn Records. $29.99 (2 CDs).

Philip Glass: Einstein on the Beach. Christopher Knowles, Samuel M. Johnson and Lucinda Childs, spoken text; Lucinda Childs Dance Company and Philip Glass Ensemble conducted by Michael Riesman. Opus Arte. $29.99 (2 DVDs).

André-Ernest-Modeste Grétry: L’épreuve villageoise. Sophie Junker, Talise Trevigne, Thomas Dolié, Francisco Fernández-Rueda; Opera Lafayette conducted by Ryan Brown. Naxos. $12.99.

Schubert: Death and the Maiden—A Collaborative Exploration. Patricia Kopatchinskaja, violin; Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra. Alpha. $18.99.

Schubert: String Quartet No. 13, “Rosamunde”; Ralf Yusuf Gawlick: Imagined Memories. Hugo Wolf Quartett (Sebastian Gürtler and Régis Bringolf, violins; Subin Lee, viola; Florian Berner, cello). Musica Omnia. $17.99 (2 CDs).

Stravinsky: The Firebird; Vladimir Nikolaev: The Sinewaveland—Homage to Jimi Hendrix. Seattle Symphony conducted by Ludovic Morlot. Seattle Symphony Media. $16.99.

     Everything considered here is experimental to a greater or lesser degree, with greater or lesser success. Linn Records’ live recording of an August 2015 Edinburgh International Festival performance of HMS Pinafore is an effort to do Sullivan largely without Gilbert, or without Gilbert’s connecting dialogue, at any rate. The music, and the words that go with it, are here, but the plot is communicated by narrator Tim Brooke-Taylor, who does a fine, straightforward job of explaining the context of most of the musical numbers and occasionally gives a few of Gilbert’s actual words in the process. This works reasonably well, except when it doesn’t – for instance, the additional “encore” verse of When I was a lad, explaining the importance of “the expression ‘if you please,’” makes no sense at all, since here it is not preceded by Sir Joseph Porter’s insistence that Captain Corcoran request that his able seamen step forward. And speaking of Sir Joseph, John Mark Ainsley has him in large part speaking his lines rather than singing them – an approach occasionally heard in performances of HMS Pinafore, but one that works less well than simply having the arias sung as librettist and composer intended. Also, for some reason, the sailors’ chorus does not sing about Sir Joseph’s “crowd of blushing beauty” as the barge approaches – instead, they repeat their earlier line about sailing the ocean blue. Perhaps the original was deemed insufficiently politically correct for the 21st century. Matters like this diminish the enjoyment of this performance for those who know HMS Pinafore already – as do the decisions not to alter the accents of Ralph Rackstraw and Captain Corcoran when they change places at the end, and not to have the whole work end with the traditional three rousing cheers. But if these “updates” (or, at any rate, changes) are less than delightful, the music, propelled by Richard Egarr’s sprightly tempos, remains as bright and bouncy as ever. And the singers are fresh-voiced and enthusiastic, especially Elizabeth Watts, whose Josephine is in such fine and even voice that she sounds nothing like what famed parodist Anna Russell once described as “the British piercing-type soprano.” Andrew Foster-Williams as Captain Corcoran and Hilary Summers as Little Buttercup also deserve to be singled out for characterization and liveliness, although Toby Spence is not quite equal to the role of Ralph – his voice noticeably cracks several times and is always thin in its higher register. As a fleet and flighty handling of HMS Pinafore, this version, characterized by particularly fine orchestral playing, is a great deal of fun. And it has an exceptional a cappella version of A British tar is a soaring soul that is as good as any ever recorded. Still, there are enough omissions and rough edges here to make G&S fans long for the days of the D’Oyly Carte Opera Company – which were, alas, “a many years ago.”

     It is hard to imagine a contrast greater than that between the light, parodistic, strongly audience-focused concept of the 90-minute HMS Pinafore and the seriously intended, audience-is-expendable, music-is-only-sort-of-there approach of Philip Glass in his four-hour-plus Einstein on the Beach. A sense of what Opus Arte’s world première DVD recording of this work looks like may be gleaned by dedicated G&S fanciers from Patience, where the lovesick dragoons sing and pose awkwardly to try to interest the 20 lovesick maidens: “You hold yourself like this [pose]. You hold yourself like that [pose]. By hook and crook you try to look both angular and flat [pose].” Everything in Glass’s work, directed by theatrical producer Robert Wilson, is posing of one sort or another. The extreme length of the opera, which has no intermissions, led Glass to say that the audience can enter and leave whenever it likes – in other words, that the audience is largely irrelevant and the music is what it is on its own, independent of whether anyone is paying attention to it. The musical style itself is now familiar, although it was less so when Glass wrote the work in 1975 (the first performance was in 1976). And the opera itself, although it remains Glass’s longest, is now known as the first part of a trilogy that also includes Satyagraha (1979) and Akhnaten (1983) – two other works focused on seminal, transformational non-military figures. But perhaps “focused” is not the right word for Einstein on the Beach, for its focus is more on the idea of Einstein than on Einstein’s ideas. It is essentially a static work filled with Glass’s essentially static music – hypnotic and involving if you like it, distended and boring if you do not – and it is left to the almost-expendable audience to determine what the whole thing “means,” to the extent that the word “means” has any, well, meaning here. The whole endeavor looks and sounds determinedly contemporary (even 40 years after its composition) and remains determinedly self-referential and self-important. The performers on this two-DVD set appear to believe in what they are doing, and there are visual moments that possess a kind of beauty analogous to that of some aural moments in Glass’s score. But these are only moments, and the opera does go on and on and on – even Glass’s determined fans may wish to treat the DVDs the same way Glass suggested Einstein on the Beach be treated in the opera house, by letting the discs continue to play while they, as audience members, wander in and out more or less at random. Einstein on the Beach is a rarefied experience intended for the cognoscenti, certainly not an opera in any traditional sense but more of a sort-of-musical semi-staged play (actually, Wilson’s staging has some very interesting elements). In general, the music of Glass is an acquired taste; this opera may not be the best place to acquire it if you do not have it already, but if you do, the DVD set will be intriguing and thought-provoking even if it is difficult to sit through the whole thing from start to finish.

     The contrast between the glacial place of Glass’s work on the one hand, the carefully integrated text and words of Gilbert and Sullivan on the other, and L’épreuve villageoise on the third (yes, a third hand) is extreme. This Naxos release is another world première, in this case the first-ever recording of a work from 1784 that was one of the most popular creations of André-Ernest-Modeste Grétry (1741-1813). As frothy and inconsequential as Glass’s opera is portentous and pretentious, L’épreuve villageoise (“The Village Trial”) has only 50-some minutes of music and four singers: two sopranos, a tenor and a baritone. All that happens here, and it is not much, is that a widow and her daughter -- both roles sung by sopranos, an interesting touch – decide to teach the daughter’s jealous fiancé a lesson about jealousy, with the daughter herself learning something about it in the process. Where Glass extends everything on an ever-expanding time scale and Gilbert and Sullivan fit the pieces of their plot and music together with the intricacy of a jigsaw puzzle, Grétry simply spins a kind of cotton-candy delicacy around the misgivings and misadventures of characters who would once, before political correctness, have been called country bumpkins. The score enchants precisely because the composer establishes the types quickly and then goes against them from time to time – for instance, when Denise (Sophie Junker) complains to her mother (Talise Trevigne) about the constant jealousy of André (Francisco Fernández-Rueda), it is in an aria whose mournfulness approaches that of far more serious fare. And when Denise, who pretends to be interested in the attentions of La France (Thomas Dolié), later learns the hurt of jealousy herself after André in turn pretends to have found another lover of his own, the scene is genuinely affecting despite its brevity. Ryan Brown and Opera Lafayette specialize in rediscovering lost (or simply misplaced) works of the 18th century, and this particular one is an especially happy find, zipping along with beguiling jauntiness. It never attains, or seeks, any deep meaning, but makes it clear that bringing pleasure to the audience is what is foremost in the composer’s mind.

     The contrasts among various releases can be intense, but sometimes, so can the contrasts within a single CD. That is the case and the whole point in an Alpha recording called Death and the Maiden—A Collaborative Exploration. This is a strange disc and is not for anyone unfamiliar with Schubert’s famed “Death and the Maiden” quartet: No. 14 in D minor, D. 810. This brilliant, beautiful and somber work from 1824, which gets its title from Schubert’s use in its second movement of the theme from his 1817 song to a poem by Matthias Claudius, is heard on this disc in Patricia Kopatchinskaja’s chamber-music adaptation. This enlarges the work sonically without deepening it emotionally, despite the first-class playing of the conductorless Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra. But the quartet is not played as a quartet: the four movements are broken up by other music instead of being given in sequence. And although in one sense these movements are the jumping-off point for this performance-art project, in another way they are only a small part of it. The CD, recorded live in concert, might actually have been better as a DVD, since the visual elements of the performance art were clearly as significant as the music. The overall focus is death, and specifically the medieval “dance of death.” So the disc opens with a Toden Tanz by organist Augustus Nörmiger (1560-1613), followed by an anonymous Byzantine Chant on Psalm 140, after which the first movement of the Schubert is played. Then comes a pavan by John Dowland – Schubert uses the pavan rhythm in his quartet’s second movement – and then that second movement is offered. Next is a madrigal by Carlo Gesualdo, followed by the third movement of the Schubert. And then come two works by György Kurtág (born 1926): Ligatura-Message to Frances-Maria (The Answered Unanswered Question) and Ruhelos (Restless) from Kafka Fragments, the aim apparently being to offer something odd and unsettling before returning at the end for the final movement of the Schubert. This CD memorializes a kind of performance art in which the performance is of high quality and the art is – well, it is certainly not Schubert’s quartet, or even a chamber-orchestra arrangement of the quartet, nor is it exactly a commentary on or some sort of deepening of the quartet’s musicality and musical message. It is an admixture of varying death-related thoughts, variously expressed, attached rather loosely to the scaffolding of a great chamber work by Schubert that is taken apart by the performers and left for the audience to reassemble mentally and emotionally if it chooses to do so – rather as Glass expects the audience of Einstein at the Beach to assemble and calculate the opera’s message and meaning. An intellectually interesting Schubert-based experiment rather than a musically convincing one, this “collaborative exploration,” an attempt to go beyond Schubert, ultimately shows that the original “Death and the Maiden” quartet can stand quite well and quite affectingly on its own, without needing anyone to emphasize the reality that, yes, thoughts about death were integral to its creation.

     The contrast between a Schubert quartet and much-later music is handled differently and to somewhat more-convincing effect on a new Musica Omnia release featuring excellent playing by the Hugo Wolf Quartett. Here the Schubert quartet is No. 13 in A minor, D. 804, the “Rosamunde,” and here it is heard as written, the performers giving it an attentive, beautifully balanced and warmly convincing reading. The ensemble playing is particularly fine, the individual players’ sound clearly evident even as their blending into a whole provides the music with warmth and solidity that makes its recollections of other Schubert works all the more affecting. This is a quartet of reminiscence, not only of the Rosamunde incidental music but also of the songs Gretchen am Spinnrade and Die Götter Griechenlands, and there are passing references to other Schubert works as well. The subtlety with which this material is integrated into something wholly new is likely what Ralf Yusuf Gawlick (born 1969) was also striving for in his Imagined Memories (2016), a quartet in which he reaches out to the biological mother he never knew. Indeed, Gawlick says his work was partly inspired by the Rosamunde quartet, which he quotes directly at one point. The Hugo Wolf Quartett, to which Gawlick dedicated Imagined Memories, approaches the work with the same intensity, excellent ensemble and ability to extricate meaning that they bring to the Schubert. The work itself, however, does not repay this level of attention and attentiveness particularly well. It is certainly a technical showpiece, demanding unending attention to the means of sound production even as Gawlick attempts to convey a series of emotions that, however, all sound much the same because of his determined use of acerbic atonality that tends to distance feelings rather than evoke them. It is possible to hear Gawlick striving to make connections with his unknown parent, and thus with the equally unknown audience for this music, and certainly there are gestures that encompass intensity and a sense of longing from time to time. But Imagined Memories comes across as episodic and unstructured despite the fact that it has clearly been put together with care, with its focus on “memory footprints” and its occasionally haunting sounds. As personal in its way as Schubert’s quartet is in its, Gawlick’s work is one that clearly has considerable meaning for the composer; but the meaning is not fully conveyed, on an emotional level, to an audience with its own unique life experiences – not even when the technical quality of the performance is as fine as it is here.

     Juxtaposition and contrast along the lines of Schubert and Gawlick have become something of a regular feature of concerts by the Seattle Symphony and CD releases on the orchestra’s own label. The use of familiar music to lure audiences into concerts where they will also hear less-known, usually contemporary pieces is actually a longstanding tradition, but Seattle Symphony practices it with more frequency and dedication than do many other ensembles. How well the compare-and-contrast concerts work depends, of course, on the quality of the pieces offered, as well as the skill with which they are performed. In the case of a new live recording of music by Stravinsky and Vladimir Nikolaev (born 1953), the performance skill is certainly there, but the musical idea of the mixture is only so-so. Certainly the Stravinsky is not the problem: Ludovic Morlot here leads the original 1910 version of The Firebird with rhythmic sensitivity and a particularly strong feeling for the warmth of the writing and the firm planting of this particular ballet in the Russian Romantic tradition – despite the fact that Stravinsky was very soon to take a great leap forward from that tradition with The Rite of Spring. There is much that is sinuous and delicate in The Firebird, and much that is presented with a rhythmic intensity that looks ahead to later Stravinsky ballets. Morlot has honed the sound of the Seattle Symphony into one whose warmth and precision coexist easily, and the orchestra’s handling of the textures of this ballet also shows admirable attentiveness to the details of Stravinsky’s scoring. Stravinsky managed always to keep matters controlled despite the fairy-tale intensity of this work’s story – the music had to be danceable, after all – but Nikolaev faces no such constraints in The Sinewaveland: Homage to Jimi Hendrix. So he insists that the performers, here including solo violinist Elisa Barston, play with all-out fury a great deal of the time, evoking the intensity of rock music to rather too great an extent: after all, typical rock songs last just a few minutes, but this work goes on for 12. Jimi Hendrix was born in Seattle, so the orchestra presumably has some sort of “hometown musician made good” feeling about this material. But for anyone who is not a big fan of Hendrix and not familiar with his style (and his famous propensity for burning his guitar), this “homage” sounds as much like noise as music. The performers labor mightily and bring forth a great deal that is loud and a great deal that is frenetic, and in that sense Nikolaev’s work effectively imitates the excesses of Hendrix and his music. But as the glissandi continue and continue and the climaxes pile upon each other and the whole piece goes on and on, the totality becomes rather less than the sum of its parts: a visit to a “land” where many people want to go (Hendrix remains enormously popular, after all, at least with a certain age group), but one which those not already interested in visiting will find rather overdone and vapid. The contrast with Stravinsky is not to Nikolaev’s benefit, or to that of Hendrix.

(+++) CLASSICAL FORMS RETHOUGHT


Jonathan Leshnoff: Symphony No. 2 (“Innerspace”); Zohar. Jessica Rivera, soprano; Nmon Ford, baritone; Atlanta Symphony Chorus and Orchestra conducted by Robert Spano. ASO Media. $18.99.

Roy Harris: Concerto for Violin and Orchestra; John Adams: Concerto for Violin and Orchestra. Tamsin Waley-Cohen, violin; BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Andrew Litton. Signum Classics. $17.99.

Mischa Zupko: Chamber Music. Sang Mee Lee, violin; Wendy Warner, cello; Mischa Zupko, piano. Cedille. $16.

Tod Dockstader: From the Archives. Starkland. $14.99.

     Three of the New Testament Gospels tell the parable of wineskins or wine bottles. The version in Matthew reads, “Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.” Although the parable’s exact interpretation is controversial, it certainly has to do with the relationship between the teachings of Jesus and then-existing Jewish practices. Whatever truth it may have for religion, though, the parable is turned on its head by many contemporary composers, who are only too willing to put new wine (their musical thoughts and their emotions as expressed through music) into old bottles (long-established classical forms). And this is directly relevant to the music of Jonathan Leshnoff (born 1973), as performed by the Atlanta Symphony under Robert Spano in a new release on the orchestra’s own label – for Leshnoff says his Symphony No. 2 (2014) is a forthright and clear exploration of his own Jewish heritage. Specifically, Leshnoff ties the music to a book called Innerspace by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan. The book posits five levels of “occlusion from God,” and the symphony’s five movements are intended to reflect all five. This is heavy philosophical freight for a work of pure music to bear, and while this symphony bears it rather well, the work needs to be convincing on its own, as music, if it is to present a meaningful message to an audience that does not know its origin and may not be Jewish or familiar with Jewish mysticism and liturgical thinking. The question, then, is whether this performance, which is certainly strongly felt and very well played, is enough to give the symphony a level of universality of emotional connection. The answer is: not really. The work is in many ways accessible, with lush strings, numerous engaging themes, and clear emotional expressions from time to time, as in the opening horns expressing what is surely anguish. But the piece as a whole meanders, seeming more an orchestral suite than a symphony, and its finale seems purely self-indulgent: it is a minute and a half of silence, intended to represent the universe that is closest to God. But how is someone who does not know Innerspace and has not done some sort of pre-reading on the symphony to know this? Silence within a symphony has been tried before: Mahler wanted five minutes of silence between the first and second movements of his Symphony No. 2, to allow the audience to absorb what happens in the first movement and prepare for a major change of tone in the second. That silence has a self-evident musical purpose – but Leshnoff’s has an extra-musical one, and as such seems not a climax but an escape into a sort of “unanswered question.” The symphony has many effective moments, but it is so strictly programmatic, on so abstruse a topic, that its value purely as music is lessened. It is paired with the oratorio Zohar (2015), for solo soprano and baritone, chorus and orchestra, which is also steeped in Judaism: the title means “brightness” or “radiance” in Hebrew and is also the title of a collection of commentaries on the Five Books of Moses in the Old Testament. The chorus sings the Hebrew words that translate as “the wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens” as Zohar opens, setting the scene for what becomes a six-movement exploration of the relationship between humans and God. The approach is surely less familiar than better-known efforts to understand God through music by drawing on the Christian tradition, but it is cut from much the same cloth and has many of the same grand gestures and flourishes as other oratorios, especially large-scale ones of the Romantic era. The Atlanta Symphony commissioned Leshnoff’s Symphony No. 2 and co-commissioned Zohar with Carnegie Hall, and the performers certainly handle both works with enthusiasm and understanding. On balance, Zohar, which hews more closely to earlier classical models than does the silent-finale symphony, reaches out more effectively to an audience that cannot be counted on to be deeply familiar with Leshnoff’s religion and, in particular, with its mystical elements.

     Symphony and oratorio are scarcely the only traditional classical forms in which modern composers continue to work. As a new Signum Classics CD shows, both Roy Harris (1898-1979) and John Adams (born 1947) also considered and reconsidered the violin concerto, producing two works that are very different in sound and effect but remain noticeably tied to the concertos of the past. The Harris concerto dates to 1949 but was not performed until 1984. As a result, it sounds a bit like a throwback to neo-Romanticism, but not in a negative way: its sumptuousness, warm orchestration and insistence on tonal beauty from the soloist are welcome amid the flood of contemporary music in which the violin’s sound is stretched beyond its customary bounds for no apparent reason beyond challenging the abilities of performers and aural tolerance of audiences. The Harris concerto is in four “sections” within its single movement. None of them is labeled with a title or tempo indication, but this is essentially a traditionally laid-out work with a broad opening, scherzo-ish second portion, emotive third part, and brisk (and short) finale. The performance by Tamsin Waley-Cohen and the BBC Symphony under Andrew Litton is an exceptional one, thoroughly involving and with expressiveness that brings out the nuances of the score beautifully. The performers also handle the three-movement Adams concerto (1993) quite well, but the work itself is less winning than the Harris concerto. Its structure is unusual-within-the-usual, with a standard three-movement concerto form (fast-slow-fast) but a very unconventional use of the violin: instead of contesting and contrasting with the orchestra, the soloist spins very extensive and generally meditative lines that Adams calls a “hypermelody” while the orchestra is reduced to a subsidiary role that falls somewhat short of the traditional notion of support. Thirty-five minutes of this is a bit much. Adams tries hard to ground the concerto in the past while at the same time producing something new: the first movement, the longest of the three by far, is essentially rhapsodic and meditative, close to a fantasy in its exploration of multiple moods. The second movement is labeled Chaconne, a direct reference to a Baroque form, but also bears the title “Body through which the dream flows,” a line from a poem by Robert Hass. This movement shows with particular clarity the composer’s determination to build a new edifice atop the classical concerto tradition. The attempt continues into the finale, which is marked Toccare (“to touch”) – a title clearly referencing another Baroque form, that of the toccata. It is all intellectually weighty but not always clearly communicated through the music itself. What the audience hears is a set of long-flowing violin melodies and a wholly subservient orchestra throughout the entire piece – a structure that both absorbs and bypasses classical-concerto traditions. The work is exceptionally well played here and has many felicitous touches, but does not really sustain emotionally throughout, coming across as an experiment in form that pulls the emotive along with it without ever quite bringing it fully to the fore. The concerto is definitely worth hearing, but it is not an easy work to enjoy or respond to if one seeks the meaning toward which it always seems to be striving.

     Several traditional types of chamber music are explored in works by Mischa Zupko (born 1971) on a new Cedille release. The most interesting material here is in the form of paired movements called Rising (2009) and Fallen (2010), the former an impression of Jesus’ ascension to Heaven that eschews the obviousness of a constantly rising violin line, the latter a depiction of a young man’s suicide leap (based on a poem by Federico García Lorca) that uses the cello’s range skillfully to depict what comes across as a slow descent. There are contrasts as well in the four-movement suite called Shades of Gray (2005), but they are on the more-obvious side in Zupko’s attempt to depict “Shadow,” “Waves,” “Ice” (the inevitable harmonics) and “Trigger.” Three additional individual but related movements on the CD are impressionistic interpretations of cosmic events. From Twilight (2015) starts with individual notes representing single stars and spreads into a more-general starscape. Eclipse (2014) uses violin and cello cleverly, having them start with differing musical lines that eventually merge. Nebula (2015) is less successful in its attempt to be musically kaleidoscopic: the intertwined lines here serve no obvious purpose. Finally there is Love Obsession (2013), written for cello, piano and six pre-recorded electronic cello tracks. It has some interesting sonorities, but they are overlaid on an obvious structure in which the same phrase – repeated, of course, obsessively – is designed to reflect the work’s title. Zupko’s music has many interesting elements, and the performers here, including Zupko himself and two musicians who are the dedicatees of several of the works, handle the material with skill and commitment. When Zupko thinks beyond the obviousness of some of his themes (in the sense of topics), he comes up with more-interesting themes (in the sense of musical material). His works do not need the electronic involvement of Love Obsession to be effective – they just need structural and presentation thoughtfulness, coupled with performances as skilled as these.

     On the other hand, electronic effects are the be-all and end-all in the music of Tod Dockstader (1932-2015). Dockstader’s attachment to electronic sounds bordered on the, well, obsessive, and the 15 works on a new Starkland CD explore his creations from the last years of his creative life, 2000-2008 – after which dementia forced him to stop composing. These pieces were assembled from thousands of sound files left behind when Dockstader died, and they are squarely in the mainstream, if that is the right word, of electronic composition in general and Dockstader’s creations in particular. Listeners who tend to think of electronic music as noise will be interested in the very last piece on the CD, Big Jig, which really does sound like noise that has been deliberately created as such with the intention of assaulting the ears. The other works’ intentions are more varied. Their titles give no real clues to how they sound: Super Choral, Chinese Morf, Basement Passage, Todt I, Anat Loop, First Target, Whisper Smoothed, Mystery Creak, Creek Bells, Creak Creek, Odd Bells, Todt II, Piano Morf and Choral Mix. The swoops and flutters, crescendos and decrescendos, sounds ranging from the voice-like to ones that seem to come from outer space, and varied sonic palette that has no referents in traditional instruments, are entirely typical of electronic compositions – and there is little to distinguish any specific piece on this disc from any other. This is textural rather than harmonic or rhythmic music, which is not to say that it lacks rhythm but that rhythmic matters are of secondary importance to the overlays of various sound waves that characterize the way the music feels. That is “feels” rather than, or as much as, “sounds.” It is easy to pick out snippets of words in some pieces, bell-like sounds, buzzers and the sound of doors opening and closing, the overtones that are a common feature of all electronic composition, echoes and re-echoes, and various effects that come across sometimes as bright, sometimes as dark and eerie, sometimes as fast-moving, sometimes as placid. What Dockstader tries to convey in these works is by no means apparent, any more than the communicative aim is clear in much other electronic music. That the works are skillfully constructed and clearly reflective of an inventive mind operating in a small musical niche is obvious. The chance that anything here will lead people who are not already enamored of electronic music to embrace it is minuscule. But the CD will be much appreciated as a musical/electronic eulogy for Dockstader, made up of his own final thoughts on a medium that he championed for many decades.

December 08, 2016

(++++) THE MANY FACES OF COMICS


Charlie Brown: Here We Go Again—A “Peanuts” Collection. By Charles Schulz. Andrews McMeel. $9.99.

Heart and Brain: Gut Instincts. By Nick Seluk. Andrews McMeel. $14.99.

The Bad Guys #1. By Aaron Blabey. Scholastic. $5.99.

     The 50-year history of Peanuts would seem to provide an inexhaustible reservoir of material that can be recycled into new collections featuring Charles Schulz’s iconic characters, but in fact this is not quite so: the earliest years of the strip looked little like the later, more-familiar ones. Still, at this stage there are plenty of recyclable Peanuts cartoons to go around, and the simple but instantly recognizable faces of the characters are as fresh, funny, and occasionally poignant as always. The latest re-collection (and recollection) of Peanuts features a particularly fine assortment of strips. Many of these focus on Charlie Brown’s hapless baseball team, and one sequence results in Charlie Brown’s decision to “go home and lie in a dark room,” resulting in three strips that are almost completely black and one that is 100% black – a virtuoso performance by Schulz (1922-2000) in the handling of a commonplace cartooning challenge to which few artists rise with this level of skill. There is also a touching and unusually pointed bit of social commentary in a sequence in which Linus starts patting birds on the head (“I think I’ve found my calling”), only to be told by his sister, loud-mouthed Lucy, that he has to stop. Linus asks Charlie Brown what is wrong with patting the birds (“They come depressed, and they go away feeling great”), Charlie Brown explains that it humiliates Lucy, and Linus says he understands that but does not see what is actually wrong with what he is doing – leading Charlie Brown to say, “No one else does it.” That level of commentary on conformity is the sort of thing that pops up periodically and unexpectedly throughout Peanuts and is one reason the strip retained freshness for so many years. Here We Go Again also includes several sequences involving Charlie Brown and the “little red-haired girl” on whom he has an unrequited crush. In the most heartrending of them, Charlie Brown is assigned to be her partner in a science project, but cannot drum up the courage to talk to her – a particularly big problem because Charlie Brown has become a safety monitor at school, and failure to do the project will mean a failing grade that will have him lose his safety-patrol position, which is “the first time I’ve ever really felt like I was somebody.” To make matters worse, Charlie Brown gets bumped by a car while helping students cross the street in the rain – but that, paradoxically, makes him feel happy and proud at being “injured in the line of duty.” To sequences like this, add the ones in which Charlie Brown’s kite gets hopelessly tangled, often in a “kite-eating tree,” and ones in which Snoopy becomes (among other things) a bird sanctuary, and several of the famous ones in which Charlie Brown tries vainly to kick a football held by Lucy and pulled away by her at the last minute, and you have a collection that is packed with smiles and some unanticipated tugs at heartstrings – a pretty good overall description of Peanuts.

     Peanuts was always intended for adults as much as for children, but few comics nowadays look for such a broad audience range. Web-based ones, in particular, tend to go decidedly in the “adult” direction – which does not, however, mean that they invariably have the sort of sexual themes that are usually classified as “adult.” In fact, there are plenty of other notions that are adults-only, since kids would simply not understand them. Nick Seluk has fastened on one of them to excellent effect in his Heart and Brain drawings – themselves a spinoff of a series called The Awkward Yeti, a blue-bow-tied, eyeglasses-wearing Bigfoot type named Lars, with self-esteem issues and, apparently, numerous body organs that spend their time arguing among themselves while pursuing their conflicting agendas. Heart and Brain focuses on two of those organs, but Seluk’s new collection, Gut Instincts, brings in quite a few more: tongue, lungs, liver, stomach, bowels, etc. Each gets a shape that is vaguely anatomically correct (perhaps 100% correct if you are a yeti) and a face that is surprisingly expressive considering its simplicity – in this way, and only this way, Seluk’s art is Peanuts-like. The basics of Heart and Brain involve the inevitable conflicts between being emotion-driven and intellect-driven. For instance, Heart – who is almost always accompanied by a nicely symbolic butterfly – makes an emotional decision to “get healthier” by going to the gym so he can “improve my resting me rate,” but within a few panels of stating his intention to Brain, Heart decides, “I don’t care what you think. I’m getting some chocolate.” While shopping, presumably at Costco, Heart reacts emotionally to the chance to buy “mustard by the firkin” (a great adult word), and Brain agrees to the purchase after analyzing the price and deciding that it is good – but once they get the condiment home, with some help from a forklift, Heart never uses it, because it is “gross.” As for the other organs, at one point they try to help with Brain’s anxiety: Stomach contorts, Bowels agree to “move things along REALLY fast or REALLY slow, depending on your preference,” and Eyes promise that only one will “twitch from time to time.” Tongue, a complete hedonist, has his own unique way of expressing things: “It tasstesss SSSO good” and “Replenish the cookiesss or I will ussher in a new era of darkness upon you all!” The theme of Heart and Brain is neatly encapsulated in a single panel showing the two facing in opposite directions as both say, “Just follow me and everything will be fine!” That is about as adult a way of looking at things as any contemporary cartoon offers – and with no “adult language” except the philosophical kind.

     The language is intended for kids, and so are the drawings, in a new series called The Bad Guys that is sort of a comic strip, sort of a graphic novel, but not really much of either one. Aaron Blabey makes no attempt to propel his story of traditional animal bad guys who decide to try being good for a change through meticulous graphic-novel art: his renderings are strictly of the crude-but-effective type. But neither does Blabey draw in ordinary comic-strip format: The Bad Guys #1 looks like a book and reads like one, too, with chapters and everything, except that every page is a single large panel, or two half-page panels, or (occasionally) three one-third-page panels, with text held to the minimum needed to keep the story going. And go it does. It starts with Mr. Wolf, the brains of the not-yet-created good-guy gang of bad guys, introducing himself and explaining that he is not the big-toothed, sharp-clawed, granny-imitating character he has been made out to be (although his police department rap sheet says that is exactly what he is). Mr. Wolf is determined to turn over a new leaf and have people stop hating and fearing him. To that end, he has invited some other notable bad guys over to learn about being good. They are Mr. Snake, whose rap sheet is a house-that-Jack-built sequence showing all the things he has eaten (including “the police dog who tried to save the policeman who tried to save the doctor who tried to save” a pet-store owner whose guinea pigs, canaries and mice Mr. Snake had already consumed). There is Mr. Piranha, member of the “Piranha Brothers Gang, 900,543 members,” and Mr. Shark, whose rap sheet is so frightening that Mr. Wolf blocks most of it from readers’ view. Eventually, though, the four bad guys agree to try being good for a change, starting with a hilarious rescue of a treed cat that they have all agreed not to eat – except that the cat does not know that, and reacts with suitable terror and some very intense use of its claws. And then the bad guys head off to free all the imprisoned dogs from the dog pound – a caper that puts Mr. Shark in a dress, Mr. Snake and Mr. Piranha through a window after several bad throws by Mr. Wolf, and the dogs themselves in a frenzy through their fear of the snake and “some kind of weird sardine type thing.” Matters may seem inauspicious in this attempt to go against type and typecasting, but by the end of the book, all the bad guys have decided that it feels nice to do good things for a change, and they are ready to head out on another adventure that they believe, against all the odds facing cartoon characters, will go off without a hitch. “To be continued,” as Blabey writes at the end – three words that the young readers at whom The Bad Guys #1 is aimed will surely take to heart. And maybe to brain.

(++++) VARIED VIEWS OF ANIMALS


The Princess and the Frogs. By Veronica Bartles. Illustrated by Sara Palacios. Balzer+Bray/HarperCollins. $17.99.

This & That. By Mem Fox. Illustrations by Judy Horacek. Scholastic. $17.99.

Christmas in the Barn. By Margaret Wise Brown. Illustrated by Anna Dewdney. Harper. $17.99.

     Animals play a wide variety of roles in children’s books, and just when you think pretty much anything they can do has been done, along comes someone like Veronica Bartles to prove you wrong. Bartles has taken the well-known fairy tale of the princess and the frog – a story that has been told and retold in many, many forms for many, many years – and given it a new twist that will delight young readers. Her story involves not one frog but many – and since it is, after all, a fairy tale, in which the kiss of a princess transforms a frog into a prince, Bartles’ story involves many princes as well. You see, Princess Cassandra wants a frog, not a prince: she is looking for a best friend, and apparently human boys just do not fill the bill. She asks the Royal Pet Handler to find her a suitable pet that will swim, jump, play, and lie on the princess’ pillow at night and sing to her. This is a tall order, and one that the Royal Pet Handler is unable to fill: aside from their other shortcomings, none of the animals he finds is green, and Princess Cassandra wants a pet to match her favorite green dress (it does not have to match the black high-top sneakers that she always wears: Sara Palacios’ illustrations are a big part of the fun here). Eventually the Royal Pet Handler, after searching the whole kingdom (Palacios’ map even shows a mermaid just offshore), finds – yes, a frog. And Princess Cassandra is delighted, until it gets to be bedtime and she kisses him good night. Then he turns into a prince and, of course, says, “Let us be married at once.” Well, they are both much too young for that, and besides, as Princess Cassandra laughingly says, “Princes aren’t pets. I want a frog!” So she finds the prince something to do around the castle and has the Royal Pet Handler resume his search. Kids will quickly see where this is leading. Frog after frog turns up and delights the princess, until she kisses each one and all of them turn into princes.  The people of the kingdom try to help by catching frogs and bringing them to the palace, but, again, one kiss from the princess and there is yet another prince roaming the halls, doing palace work or simply getting in the way. “Soon she ran out of jobs for them,” Bartles explains. The princess takes matters into her own hands and eventually finds a frog all by herself – but this one too turns into a prince, except with a difference: “I liked being a frog,” he complains. Well, the princess finally gives up and plays all by herself, but she is lonely; and then she happens upon the prince who had liked being a frog, who has nowhere to go and nothing to do. She feels sorry for him and gives him a kiss on the cheek – at which point, lo and behold, he turns back into a frog; and as Bartles explains, they lived happily ever after as long as the princess remembered not to kiss him again. The Princess and the Frogs is best for kids who already know the original fairy tale – otherwise a lot of its humor is lost – but for them, it is funny from start to finish, and a great turnabout in animal-character use.

     The basic critters in This & That are nothing unusual: they are mice, a mother mouse and her child. But Mem Fox’s bedtime-story book handles them in unusual ways. It opens with, “I’ll tell you a story of this,/ and I’ll tell you a story of that,” and “this and that” becomes a recurring phrase as the mother mouse weaves wondrous tales of other animals. Mother and child become participants in the stories: first there are caves filled with bats and “a chimp with a magic hat,” and the mice are seen approaching by floating in a box on a stream. Then they go over a waterfall and swim to land, and the next “this and that” is about boys and a cat and an elephant walking along a road. Then the mice, who have climbed a tree, jump onto the elephant’s back and proceed to a “this and that” bazaar filled with lots of people and lots of animals, all of them doing lots of things – this is one of  Judy Horacek’s best illustrations here. And so the mice go from story to story as the mother tells more and more tales, until finally it is time for bed; and now the words “this and that” change to “that and this,” so Fox can end the book with a rhyme in which the mother mouse gives her little one a kiss. This & That is a charmer, unusual enough to hold kids’ attention as bedtime approaches but not so intense or complex as to over-excite them and keep them awake past bedtime.

     The animal focus of Christmas in the Barn is of a very different sort. This (+++) book by Margaret Wise Brown is a rather odd retelling of the story of the birth of Christ. It originally came out in 1952 with illustrations – alternating black-and-white with color – by Barbara Cooney. A new 2007 edition featured all-color pictures by Diane Goode that placed the story in contemporary New England. Now illustrations by the late Anna Dewdney (1965-2016) also all in color, return the story to its original time – the narrative does, after all, say the tale takes place “in a big warm barn in an ancient field.”  Unfortunately, the writing here is not Brown’s best: she rhymes “hay” with “way” with “day” with “hay” again, and then the next line ends with the unrhymed word “inn,” and later she rhymes “grass” with “ass.” Dewdney makes the animals suitably wide-eyed and attentive, giving them somewhat anthropomorphic expressions; she also shows the “one great star…burning bright” to good effect, and portrays the Three Wise Men looking on with appropriate admiration and awe. It is a bit strange, though, that the name of Jesus is never mentioned, although there is a reference to “the dawning Christmas Day.” Dewdney’s use of white birds, presumably doves, flying from the barn, presumably to spread the news of Christ’s birth, is a nice touch, but the book as a whole seems a rather thin and weak retelling of the story of Christmas, for all its use of animals to try to involve young children in the tale and give the story a universality extending even beyond humanity. Intended for ages 4-8, Christmas in the Barn is probably best for children in the youngest part of that age range – ones whose families have already told them the story of Christmas, so they will understand that this is indeed that tale, looked at from a differing and more animal-centric viewpoint.

(++++) SOME CREATURES GREAT AND SMALL


Unlikely Companions: The Adventures of an Exotic Animal Doctor (or, What Friends Feathered, Furred, and Scaled Have Taught Me about Life and Love). By Laurie Hess, D.V.M., with Samantha Rose. Da Capo. $24.99.

     You can never have enough James Herriots. Herriot – real name James Alfred Wight (1916-1995) – was the British veterinary surgeon whose fictional and real-world books about animals and their owners were published during a quarter-century starting in 1969. The American version of one book, made up of two British volumes, was called All Creatures Great and Small – a misquotation of Coleridge, whose The Rime of the Ancient Mariner refers to “all things both great and small.” This volume and its title have become something of a watchword, or catchphrase, for other books focusing on companion animals and their humans.

     To set themselves apart from animal caregivers who have written books already, authors such as Laurie Hess need an “angle” of some sort, and Hess’s is her type of veterinary practice: board-certified in avian medicine, she also treats all sorts of other animals beyond the traditional dog-and-cat realm. And it is the chance to read about those animals, their human companions, and their health needs – with all the triumph and tragedy that implies – that makes Unlikely Companions so attractive.

     Like the semi-autobiographical Herriot books, Unlikely Companions is in large part about its author, but her personal story does not intertwine quite as seamlessly with that of the animals as a reader might hope. One reason may be that Samantha Rose, who assisted with the book, is a TV writer who may be responsible for a somewhat more-breathless pace than is really necessary. For example, the book opens with a death, and it takes three pages of ominous prose before readers find out what sort of animal has died: a sugar glider. This opening mystery is scarcely necessary. But a good deal of the book is built around it, as other sugar gliders also die and Hess, in addition to caring for the ones that fall ill, tries to figure out what has happened to them. As a thread connecting what is otherwise an unfocused narrative, the sugar-glider story assumes outsize importance right through to its eventual solution, which stands as the book’s climax.

     But it is the small, encapsulated stories that are the most gripping elements here. There is, for example, the tale of the surgery on Daisy, “a five-foot-long and very pregnant iguana” with a condition called egg binding: she has numerous infertile eggs that she cannot expel. The details of the surgery – enough to make its difficulty clear, but not so many as to turn this into a veterinary-medicine textbook – are well presented, and Hess’s description of her concerns certainly comes through in what sounds like the authentic voice of a caring animal doctor: “To survive, Daisy needed a blood donor, and it’s not as though donor iguanas are out cruising the hallways of the animal hospital.” Another brief story – readers will be glad this one is not longer – is about “a sting operation” that “seized more than one hundred illegal reptiles, including rare species of tortoises and giant snakes,” from a warehouse that “smelled so bad from rotting flesh that we had to wear gas masks to retrieve the animals.”

     The animal tales are, inevitably, stories about humans as well, but few of the human beings come through here with as much depth as do their companions. One who does is Bernice, the 72-year-old owner of the iguana that needed surgery, who “had severe emphysema and required an oxygen tent to get from one room to another,” but who was so devoted to Daisy that “she somehow managed to lift the pregnant lizard into her Buick and drive three hours upstate to my hospital, wearing her oxygen mask the entire way.” Readers will be rooting for Daisy to survive for her own sake and Bernice’s, and the fact that she does is a real “up” moment in Unlikely Companions.

     The material on Hess herself, and her family, is less interesting, simply because it is so mundane. When one of her sons comes down with conjunctivitis while at school, for example, Hess is at a farm where there is no cell-phone service, so the pickup has to be done by her husband, Peter: “I squirmed, feeling bad that I’d been so out of touch. I’d missed another maternal moment, and as he so often and dependably does, Peter had shown up in my absence. I was sure he’d done it without hesitation or any resentment toward me, and still I wished that I’d been there instead.” Passages like this are only mildly effective in contrasting the everyday reality of Hess’s family life with the everyday reality of her work – more about animals and less about familiar familial circumstances would have made Unlikely Companions more engrossing. On the other hand, the passage in which Hess, determined to open her own exotic-pet hospital, drives herself to actual collapse – it turns out she has adult-onset type 1 diabetes – gives a good sense of her strength and determination.

     Books in the Herriot mode follow a predictable pattern of mixing animal and human stories; and there is always plenty of heartache to go around – anyone who does not get weepy at some point during Unlikely Companions is too hard-hearted to share a life with a companion animal of any sort. Hess writes at one point of “the day’s full range of disappointment, rage, fear, and loss,” and that is a pretty good description of many of the days of an exotic-animal vet, or a traditional vet, for that matter. It is also a good description of the days of many doctors who treat human patients. But it is books like this one, focusing on creatures not of our own species but wholly dependent on us for the basics of life, and providing us in turn with a deep emotional connection, that connect with us in a visceral way – because these animal companions are wholly reliant on our care. Unlikely Companions is not the best animal-vet book out there – Herriot’s own still stand head-and-shoulders above those of his successors – but it has plenty of heart. The title of its final chapter says it all: this is a book about “Love without Reservation.”

(++++) MUSICAL GIFT WITH LASTING MEANING


My First Classical Albums. Naxos. $49.99 (9 CDs).

     The understandable and somewhat justifiable stampede to push education heavily in the direction of the STEM subjects – science, technology, engineering and mathematics – has had a deeply unfortunate side effect, whose true impact may not be known for decades. Yes, the STEM fields are the economic engines currently driving much of society, in both the developed and less-developed worlds. But driving it where? The purpose of a so-called liberal education has always been to produce adults with at least some knowledge of and comfort in fields that diverge from immediate practicality and speak to what can be called, for want of a better term, humanity’s spiritual side. Without knowledge of or interest in the arts, we risk becoming a world devoid of ultimate purpose and ultimate aspiration, one in which we get better and better at making more and more things that do less and less for any aspect of life beyond the everyday and mundane. It is already quite possible for someone to graduate from college without, for example, taking a single course involving Shakespeare – indeed, such a course could be deemed a waste of time if a student could instead learn, say, a new programming language. But society as a whole loses something unquantifiable but crucial to its future when it wholly abandons fields that may not offer immediate technological gratification or brightened career prospects but that show us how much we are capable of thinking, and in what depth, in fields other than those that are obviously economically useful.

     Christmas, which after all has a religious and spiritual basis dating back to the Saturnalia and before – even though it has largely become a commercial holiday – can be a time for family members to connect with each other and, in the traditional exchange of gifts, perhaps exchange a bit of meaning as well. It can be a time to make a bit of an attempt to help people reach for their higher selves – however defined – instead of looking only at that which is immediately practical and practicable. Thus, well-chosen gifts of music can not only bring immediate pleasure but also help show the recipients – children and adults alike – that there is and ought to be more to life than what the STEM fields can offer, that the undeniable worth and importance of those fields is not all of which people are capable and not always indicative of the best that we can be. In the absence of schools teaching this extremely important but not particularly lucrative subject, it falls to true believers in the power of the so-called humanities (which are called “human” for a reason) to produce material that can help us connect with our potentially higher and better selves. Thanks to its enormous catalogue, Naxos is in the forefront of this effort, since there are so many ways it can package and repackage excellent performances of a wide variety of music, directing the material to different audiences in different forms.

     My First Classical Albums is a perfect example of this and a superb choice as a gift for a child or, for that matter, an adult who thinks the stupefying dullness of most pop singing is all that the word “music” means. This excellent and very well-priced nine-CD set includes albums labeled Classical Music, Mozart, Beethoven, Tchaikovsky, Piano, Violin, Ballet, Lullaby and Orchestra. There is plenty of overlap among the CDs – encountering the repetition of some material and understanding the reasons for it is in itself a useful learning experience – but each of them also stands thematically on its own, to very good effect. The amount of music per CD is very generous – all nine approach the traditional 80-minute limit of compact discs. And the performances are uniformly good-to-excellent and, in this context, more than good enough to serve as well-thought-out introductions to the classical-music world. Indeed, considerable thinking has clearly gone into the programming here. The Classical Music CD serves as an introduction to the whole set and includes several pieces also heard on other, more-focused discs – and that is just fine. This CD starts with part of Rossini’s William Tell Overture, one of the few classical works likely to be highly familiar even to people with no knowledge of the classical-music field; and the disc includes easy-to-listen to pieces by Beethoven (first movement of the Fifth Symphony), Vivaldi (first movement of “Spring” from The Four Seasons), Haydn (finale of the Trumpet Concerto), Brahms (Hungarian Dance No. 5), and Bach and Grieg and Bartók and Dvořák and Saint-Saëns and others. It also includes pieces by John Adams and John Williams (the latter from a Harry Potter film) – an excellent way to show that classical music is not (or at least not always) super-esoteric and confined to erudite listeners and concert halls or opera houses.

     The music itself is only part of the excellence of My First Classical Albums. The included booklet is exceptional, because it brings music that many likely think of as esoteric down to earth, without in any way misstating its significance. For Fauré’s Berceuse, for example, the text says, “Time to be quiet as you let the music move around you. The tune on the violin wanders gently along, and the piano supports it like an older brother or sister.” That is a marvelous image for this work, and an apt one. And not all the images are verbal: Grieg’s Hall of the Mountain King from Peer Gynt not only gets a brief description but also receives a wonderful cartoon drawing of a troll, something along the lines of Where the Wild Things Are. The important thing is that the text really does explain the music, but it does so in a distinctly non-threatening way. Thus, for Debussy’s Golliwog’s Cakewalk, there is an explanation that the work starts with “a jerky, jazzy dance,” followed by a slower section that “wanders around, as if it could go anywhere,” after which “the jazzy tune is back again!”  Exactly right.

     There is more. Every description comes with a “keyword” that neatly describes the music and should fit right in with the way young people now tend to relate to information. The Swan from Carnival of the Animals is “gliding,” for example, and the Badinerie from Bach’s Orchestral Suite No. 2 is “sparkle.” These well-chosen words encapsulate the music well – not completely, but in a way that makes it easy for an inexperienced ear to latch onto the sounds and hear them with a degree of immediate comprehension and understanding.

     The presentation is exactly the same for the eight albums after Classical Music – in fact, written descriptions from the first CD are repeated word for word when the same music is reused; and that is a good thing in this context, since it reinforces the material. The booklet gives a brief general discussion of the material on each disc before getting into the specifics of the music, whether by offering a short biography of a specific composer or by explaining something about the different types of pianos and the basics of piano playing. Enlivened by pleasant general illustrations as well as ones specific to individual pieces, the booklet is an integral part of My First Classical Albums and a very valuable element of the release.

     The fact is that the whole boxed set is very valuable. Of course, most of the material is excerpted from longer works – but Naxos has done a wonderful job of selecting a few pieces in their entirety: Beethoven’s Fidelio Overture on the Beethoven disc, Chopin’s “Minute” waltz on the piano-focused one, Vaughan Williams’ Fantasia on “Greensleeves” on the orchestra-focused CD. And while almost all the works on these discs will be familiar to anyone already involved in classical music, there are a few pieces here and there that are a bit off the beaten path, or at least unexpected in this context: the Kyrie from Mozart’s Requiem, a Beethoven military-band march, one of Tchaikovsky’s Six Romances, a Scarlatti sonata, and so on. There is truly a wealth of music here, and a wealth of material for opening doors to a life that is not exclusively focused on everyday practicality and the exigencies of competition and career. It is unfortunate that a wonderful release such as My First Classical Albums must be seen as a replacement rather than a supplement for in-school (and in-home) music education and musical experience, but that is the inevitable consequence of there being only a limited amount of time for teaching young people, and thus a limited number of topics on which it is possible to focus. The current educational environment gives short shrift to the arts, kicking the consequences of the STEM orientation down the road to a time when today’s teachers will be gone and their students will likely face a world of substantial technological advances while lacking the background to understand that there is more to human beings than the sum of their parts and their inventions. It would be utterly naïve to believe that My First Classical Albums can turn the tide of unending (and, as noted, somewhat justifiable) technology focus on its own. But as the old proverb has it, “it is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness,” and My First Classical Albums has the content and presentation needed to be a bright spot through this holiday season and for many years to come.