Shostakovich: 24 Preludes and Fugues, Op. 87. Yulianna Avdeeva, piano. Pentatone. $26.99 (2 CDs).
Beethoven: Piano Concerto No. 3; Brahms: Piano Concerto No. 1. Joshua Pierce, piano; Slovak State Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Bystrik Rezucha (Beethoven); Slovak Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Paul Freeman (Brahms). MSR Classics. $14.95.
Shostakovich’s 24 Preludes and Fugues, Op. 87 were scarcely the first pieces composed to explore the major and minor keys of the chromatic scale. Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier did it twice (1722 and 1742); Chopin produced 24 Preludes, Op. 28 in the 1830s; Alkan wrote his Op. 35 and Op. 39 sets – which go well beyond the scope of other works of the type – in 1848 and 1857; and Shostakovich himself produced a work called 24 Preludes, Op. 34 in 1933, almost 20 years before writing his Op. 87 music. Shostakovich’s Op. 87, although clearly inspired by Bach, proceeds differently through the keys: Bach’s paired preludes and fugues move up the chromatic scale in major/minor pairs, while Shostakovich organizes his pieces around the circle of fifths, from zero accidentals for Nos. 1 and 2 to one sharp for Nos. 3 and 4, two sharps for Nos. 5 and 6, and so forth. Beyond this, the harmonic language and keyboard approach of Shostakovich’s Op. 87 differ in many ways from those of Bach, who of course was not writing for the piano. Still, knowledge and understanding of Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier is very helpful for performers and listeners to have in the back of their minds (or the back of their ears) while listening to the Shostakovich work. And it is evident from Yulianna Avdeeva’s careful, controlled, poised and elegant performance on Pentatone that she has studied both Bach and Shostakovich with considerable attentiveness and emerged with a thorough understanding of what Shostakovich sought in his Op. 87. It takes two-and-a-half hours to perform these 24 Preludes and Fugues, and it is to Avdeeva’s credit that her readings never seem to drag or become impatient: she explores each prelude-and-fugue pair knowledgeably and on its own terms, allowing each its individual pacing, flow and perspective. This is clear from the very start, when Shostakovich begins his C major prelude with the identical notes chosen by Bach for his prelude in the same key: on the one hand, Avdeeva explores the similarities, but on the other, she shows herself well aware of the differences – notably in the Shostakovich prelude’s harmonic complexity. Throughout the Shostakovich cycle, Avdeeva remains on firm footing, picking up the many individual touches of the components of Op. 87, with some highlights being the staccato notes underlying Fugue No. 5 (D major), the difficult scurrying of Fugue No. 9 (E major), the Bachian chorale opening Prelude No. 10 (C-sharp minor), the waltz form of Prelude No. 15 (D-flat major), the moto perpetuo Prelude No. 21 (B-flat major), and the sheer complexity of the extended (and Bach-referencing) concluding Fugue No. 24 (D minor). Like fine recordings of Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier, Avdeeva’s reading of Shostakovich’s Op. 87 reveals new details and new depth on each rehearing: she is not only technically proficient but also musically thoughtful about the structure of individual pieces and the way the parts of this work fit into its totality. And there is a small but interesting supplement to Op. 87 offered by Avdeeva as an encore: a separate Prelude and Fugue in C-sharp Minor that Shostakovich sketched but abandoned – which Polish composer Krzysztof Meyer (born 1943), who knew and was a friend of Shostakovich, completed, and which here receives its world première recording. It is scarcely a substantial work, lasting less than three-and-a-half minutes, but it is interesting to hear in a what-might-have-been way and as a chance to experience a bit more of Shostakovich’s thinking regarding what would become his monumental Op. 87.
First-rate pianism is at the service of much-more-familiar material on an MSR Classics CD featuring Joshua Pierce performing two standard-repertoire concertos with his usual élan. The disc includes a 1998 studio recording of Beethoven’s Piano Concerto No. 3, paired with a 1993 live performance of Brahms’ Piano Concerto No. 1, with both performances remastered and generally sounding fine. Pierce takes a somewhat speedy, if not actually over-fast, view of both concertos, more strongly so in the Brahms, which could use a bit more heft. The finale, in particular, is somewhat lacking in gravitas: it is, after all, marked Allegro non troppo, but the non troppo gets short shrift here. The overall aural ambience of the Brahms is also somewhat on the echo-y side, likely the result of the acoustics at The Reduta in Bratislava, where this performance took place. The two orchestras are comparable in sound: the Slovak Philharmonic, based in Bratislava, was founded in 1949 and is generally considered the region’s top ensemble, but the Košice-based Slovak State Philharmonic, founded in 1968, is equally effective in this frequently performed material. Both conductors are workmanlike in their handling of the music: sections-within-orchestra and orchestra-against-solo balance are fine, and if there are no particular insights into the concertos or enlightening emphases in the orchestral portions, there are certainly no unpleasant surprises either. In fact, there is really nothing wrong with these performances, and the minor critiques of them can justifiably be thought of as nitpicking. But the reality is that when music is as hyper-familiar and as frequently played and recorded as these two concertos, tiny differences of approach and sound loom larger than they would in less-commonly-heard material. It is, in fact, difficult to determine the potential audience for this disc. Neither reading is so innovative or technically outstanding as to be a must-have supplement to the complete sets of Beethoven and Brahms concertos that at-home listeners are extremely likely to have. The remastered sound is fine, but it is not exceptionally good, and the live 1993 reading of the Brahms, no matter how carefully adjusted and tweaked, is not quite at the quality level that listeners are likely to expect 30+ years after the recording was made. Pierce’s playing is the main attraction here: even if there is a certain sense of once-over-lightly in these readings, especially that of the Brahms, there is undeniable beauty, warmth and thoughtfulness in his interpretations to go with his undoubted technical ability. So the CD would seem most likely to appeal to listeners who are already fans of Pierce and would like to hear how he handles thrice-familiar works – or how he did handle them in the 1990s. That audience limitation, and the slight but noticeable less-than-stellar elements of these performances, make this a (+++) CD that is more a chance to experience one first-rate pianist’s handling of well-known material than it is an opportunity to gain any new insights into the music itself.