Michel
Corrette: Les Délices de la Solitude—Sonatas, Op. 20. Michelle Kesler and Miranda Wilson, cellos. MSR
Classics. $14.95.
Bach:
Toccatas, BWV 910-916. Francesco
Tristano, piano. Naïve. $16.99.
D.
Scarlatti: Sonatas K1, 9, 27, 32, 34, 96, 141, 149, 159, 175, 208, 209, 291,
322, 377, 380, 430, 466, 491, 513, and 531; A. Scarlatti: Sonata in D minor,
“Arioso.” James Brawn, piano. MSR
Classics. $14.95.
Steven
Ricks: Medusa in Fragments; Baucis and Philemon. New Focus Recordings. $18.99.
Michel Corrette (1707-1795) managed to straddle two very different
musical eras while remaining firmly committed to the earlier of them. Although
he died four years later than Mozart, Corrette was firmly and always a Baroque
composer, allowing new musical trends and approaches to sweep by largely
unheeded. While this has landed him in a sort of purgatorial ignominy from a
creativity standpoint, it is worth encountering his music from time to time if
only to be reminded how very well-made and refreshing his thoughts and
approaches were – even if they were more-or-less outdated by the end of his
lifetime. A new MSR Classics release features six thoroughly charming and
engaging Corrette sonatas for two cellos, which were written when Bach was
still alive (1739) and fit quite neatly indeed into the Baroque worldview. The
six pieces, bearing the charming overall title Les Délices de la Solitude (“The Delights of Solitude”), are
essentially three-or-four-movement Baroque suites, featuring the expected
dances (Allemande, Sarabande, Corrente, Giga) and the musical forms associated
with Bach’s time (Fuga, Preludio, Aria). Michelle Kesler and Miranda Wilson
play the music with verve and style, allowing the richness of tone inherent in
a pair of cellos to complement the enjoyably upbeat pacing of many of the
movements, notably those designated Presto.
There is nothing substantial in this music – the sonatas are all seven to nine
minutes long, and there is little differentiation between the three-movement
ones and the two in four movements (Nos. 4 and 5). There is some well-managed tonal
richness in the sole minor-key sonata (No. 2 in D minor), but nowhere is there
any mining of emotional depth – that would be out of place in this era and
certainly in Corrette’s output. Kesler and Wilson are especially well aware of
the importance of rhythmic clarity in the dance-derived movements, which as a
result have a certain degree of very pleasant “swing” to them. This is quite a
short CD – 48 minutes – but it encapsulates quite a lot about Corrette’s music
and his never-faltering commitment to a musical time period in which he
continued to dwell for more than half a century after composing these small
gems.
It is interesting to juxtapose Corrette’s musical thinking with that of
Bach, who was already expanding the notion of a freer compositional method and
less-restrained use of instrumental capabilities decades before Les Délices de la Solitude. Back around
1710, Bach created seven toccatas for keyboard that are already imbued with
forward thinking and rhythmic sensitivity that Corrette, all those years later,
never really attained (or, to be fair, aspired to attain). Intriguingly, Bach
wrote five of the seven toccatas in minor keys – by no means a typical approach
for studies like these – and included in them a number of formal elements
(fugues are prominent) but no dance movements, thus differentiating them from
suite structure. Dance rhythms do creep in here and there, though, as in the
third movement of BWV 912, which is as bright a Fuga as one could possibly
expect. The exact reasons for creation of the toccatas are unknown, but they
sound rather like teaching exercises, sometimes quite overtly (as in the first
movement of BWV 911) and at other times more subtly (the Adagio of BWV 913). Bach’s toccatas are about the same length as
Corrette’s sonatas, but since there are seven by Bach and only six by Corrette,
the new Naïve disc featuring Francesco Tristano is longer – about 58 minutes. The
music also comes across as considerably more varied and, even several decades
before the Corrette and even as possible training works, less stodgy. It is,
unfortunately, a bit difficult to recommend Tristano’s CD wholeheartedly, for
the very clear and obvious reason that he plays the toccatas on a modern piano
(a Yamaha). This is a constant underlying frustration where Tristano’s Bach is
concerned: this is his third Bach recording (following the Partitas and English
Suites), and while it is played with just as much sensitivity and skill as the
earlier releases – including some notable pointillism in some of the faster
movements – the fact remains that the sound of a piano just does not meld very
well with the sensibilities underlying this music. Of course, this is an
ongoing and never-to-be-resolved issue: pianists have long since claimed Bach’s
keyboard works as their own, as well they should, but in some of Bach’s keyboard material, the piano is more ill-fitting (compared
with the harpsichord or clavichord) than in other works. The toccatas do not
work very well as piano pieces, which means that this is a (+++) CD for listeners interested
in the actual sound of these Bach offerings. But it has to be said that within
the self-imposed limitations of using a modern keyboard instrument, Tristano
delivers sensitive, well-balanced and frequently charming performances.
The issue of instrumental appropriateness also results in a (+++) rating
for a very well-played and generous (77-minute) MSR Classics recording of a nice
selection of Domenico Scarlatti harpsichord sonatas – styled “keyboard
sonatas,” of course, when played on the piano, as they are by James Brawn. A
very short encore by Domenico’s father, Alessandro, is a nice touch at the
conclusion of the CD, but the real meat of the matter is Brawn’s choices among
the 555 sonatas and his handling of their various moods, pacing, and technical
complexities. Part of the joy inherent in listening to the Scarlatti
harpsichord sonatas involves discovering how performers overcome their manifest
difficulties, which in some cases make them into very complex undertakings for
any harpsichordist. Those difficulties are less apparent in performances on
piano, but they are there nevertheless, and none of them seems to concern Brawn
to any degree. Indeed, there is a fluidity to his playing that makes a good
case for some of these works as piano pieces – the delicate “Aria,” K32, for
example, which has a charming if somewhat inappropriate-for-its-era delicacy
that turns it into something of a proto-salon piece. The faster and brighter
pieces come across as studies of a sort: for example, “La Caccia,” K96, is all
about rhythmic contrast and a kind of crescendo/decrescendo approach that is
foreign to the harpsichord but that is effective from a pianistic standpoint. Brawn
clearly relishes the emotionalism that he finds lurking in sonatas such as
“Cantabile,” K208, and he does not hesitate to use the piano’s emotive
capabilities to bring the emotive elements to the fore. And Brawn has fun with
the quick pace of sonatas such as “Tarantella,” K531 – although here as
elsewhere he is a touch too fond of crescendo/decrescendo tactics. In some ways
it is probably best to think of this recording not as a foray into Scarlatti
but as Brawn’s highly personal extraction for 21st-century listeners
of rhythms, harmonies and emotions that the pianist has discovered within old
manuscripts and is eager to bring into the present day using the capabilities
of a contemporary instrument. The disc is a lot of fun when considered from
that standpoint – but for what Scarlatti was really all about, well-considered
harpsichord performances are even more important than is the case when it comes
to the keyboard music of Bach.
Of course, contemporary musicians do not revisit the past solely by
means of instrumental choices. Composers, in particular, often journey back by
choosing the concepts of their works and then clothing tales in olden style in
very modern dress indeed. That is the approach of Steven Ricks (born 1969) in
two works on a New Focus Recordings CD. Ricks works in the electroacoustic
medium, which scarcely lends itself to representational approaches to the past
but which certainly offers interpretative leeway when it comes to a “past” that
never really existed – the mythological. Both works on this disc juxtapose
ancient tales with hyper-modern aural aesthetics – a combination that will
certainly not be to all tastes but that Ricks, within his chosen medium, uses
skillfully. Thus, the monodrama Medusa in
Fragments is a non-linear retelling of the story, or part of the story, of
Medusa: a sense of alienation pervades the material (electronics are especially
good at conveying that), and although a soprano voice figures prominently in
the work, it is pre-recorded, making it part and parcel of the electronic
fabric within which the music unfolds. As tends to be the case with much
electroacoustic material, Medusa in
Fragments has more of the intellectual than the emotive about it, and while
its overall intensity is clear enough, it reiterates its material rather too
insistently and seems to go on longer than the content fully justifies. The
other work on this (+++) CD, however, is even more extended and extensive: Baucis and Philemon is a full-fledged
chamber opera, and here Ricks uses techniques that go beyond the strictly
electronic. There is straight narrative, clearly pronounced declamatory
singing, a representation of a thunderstorm, and an interesting intertwining of
some acoustic instruments with electronic sounds that expand upon or contrast
with the aural environment. Because Baucis
and Philemon is broken down into a dozen sections, it does not feel as
extended (or overextended) as Medusa in
Fragments. Furthermore, the very simplicity of some of the sounds in Baucis and Philemon – birdsong and
water, for example – gives the chamber opera an accessibility that the
monodrama lacks. The use of such touches as a solo cello and piquant piccolo
gives the material aural variety beyond that of most electroacoustic music,
although the actual words spoken and sung spend rather too much time insisting
that they are profoundly meaningful when in fact they are more-or-less
commonplace. It is tempting to think of Baucis
and Philemon as an intermittently successful experiment in operatic (or at
least staged) form, although in reality there have been many modern pieces
created with analogous if not identical components. Nevertheless, listeners who
may wonder whether contemporary sound can be used to illustrate (if perhaps not
illuminate) thoughts and ideas of the past will find a number of elements in Baucis and Philemon that are worth
thinking about, even if the totality does not ultimately coalesce into anything
particularly profound or revelatory.