Beethoven: Piano Concertos Nos. 1-5. Stewart Goodyear, piano;
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Andrew Constantine. Orchid
Classics. $33.99 (3 CDs).
Mieczysław Weinberg: Clarinet Concerto; Clarinet
Sonata; Chamber Symphony No. 4. Robert Oberaigner, clarinet; Dresden Chamber
Soloists conducted by Michail Jurowski; Michael Schöch, piano. Naxos. $12.99.
Alicia Terzian: Concerto for Violin and Orchestra;
Three Pieces for Strings. Rafael Gintoli, violin; Siberian State Symphony Orchestra conducted by
Vladimir Lande. Navona. $14.99.
It would seem logical that, in a year
celebrating the 250th anniversary of Beethoven’s birth, recordings
of his music would be all about, you know, Beethoven. But someone apparently
did not get that message to Stewart Goodyear and/or Orchid Classics, whose new
release of Beethoven’s piano concertos focuses to an unseemly extent on the
pianist, not the music. The three-CD foldout cardboard package displays four
photos of Goodyear; the enclosed booklet displays five (one repeated from the
package front). Yes, nine Goodyear photos in all. And the 16-page booklet
contains not only those five full-page Goodyear photos, but also two pages of
text about Goodyear and two pages of text by
Goodyear. There is not a word about the BBC National Orchestra of Wales or
about conductor Andrew Constantine. So, on the basis of presentation alone,
this is clearly a “celebrity-ization” of Goodyear rather than a serious entry
into the Beethoven catalogue. Oh, and the third CD contains only the “Emperor”
concerto, despite there being plenty of room for something else, such as the
early E-flat concerto or the piano version of the Violin Concerto. Apparently
those would not add sufficiently to the star power celebrated here. Thank
goodness Goodyear is as good a pianist as he is: the release proves worthwhile
musically despite the overdone, inappropriate packaging. Listeners more
interested in music than portrait photography and self-glorification will find
a great deal to like in this cycle, particularly in the first three concertos.
Goodyear not only has a pleasantly modulated, at times rather light touch
(despite playing the work on a modern piano), but also has a fine sense of the
rhythmic bounce and splashes of humor in the first two concertos – “humor” not
being a word often associated with Beethoven. There is whimsicality bordering on puckishness in Nos. 1 and 2. And No. 3 comes across
as more serious but still largely Mozartean in tone and emphasis – a worthy counter
to the way it is sometimes performed as a kind of early Romantic piece filled
with grand gestures. The handling of all three of the earlier concertos places
them with pleasant firmness in the Classical era, or at least (in No. 3) on the
cusp of something beyond that time period but scarcely all the way into
Romanticism. A considerable amount of credit for these performances goes to
Constantine and the orchestra, whose accompaniment is crisp, light, and very
well-balanced with the sound of the piano solo: neither conductor nor orchestra
may be mentioned in the release, but both have a very strong presence in it.
The fourth and fifth concertos are also quite well-performed, but somewhat less
successful. No. 4 has unusual structure and considerable lyricism, the latter
getting rather short shrift here: there are no fireworks written into this piece, but
there is plenty of expansiveness and some striving (notably in the slow
movement) for a genuinely new form of communication with the audience.
Goodyear’s playing is quite good but a touch on the cool side, with Constantine
again going along with him effectively but not eliciting as much warmth as this
music deserves. As for the “Emperor,” No. 5 can be presented as almost entirely
a display piece, and that is basically how Goodyear handles it, delivering a
striking but unsubtle performance that is all showmanship and splendor. His
enthusiasm, and Constantine’s, may be infectious, but the overall effect is of
a work rather closer to Liszt than is appropriate for the material or its
provenance. Certainly there are many pleasures in this set, including the very
fine collaboration between soloist and conductor, and the sensitive orchestral
playing. The overall impression, however, is of a bit too much superficiality –
the same impression conveyed even more strongly by packaging decisions that are
really quite wrongheaded.
Neither the music nor the performers on a
new Naxos CD could be said to have the “star power” involved in Beethoven’s
piano concertos, but the recording of Mieczysław Weinberg’s three works for
clarinet is nevertheless a very worthwhile and often fascinating one. The
reputation of Weinberg (1919-1996) has been growing in recent years as his
skill in multiple forms has become increasingly clear, and his clarinet pieces
are further evidence of the quality of his music – and its resemblance to that
of his longtime friend and champion, Shostakovich. The concerto is late
Weinberg, dating to 1970, and shows the relationship with the late music of
Shostakovich (who died in 1975) unusually clearly in its mixture of the lyrical
and the sardonic. Alternately pensive and intense, the concerto is a work of
varying moods, which tend to tumble over one another in somewhat helter-skelter
fashion. Robert Oberaigner handles the material with empathy as well as skill,
and the Dresden Chamber Soloists under Michail Jurowski provide well-balanced
backup. Oberaigner also performs effectively with Michael Schöch on piano in
the much earlier sonata, which dates to 1945. The sonata has more poise and
classical balance than the later concerto, but a similar hodgepodge of emotions
that often change quickly and unpredictably – a hallmark of much of Weinberg’s
music. The overall mood of the sonata is rather bittersweet, and the ending
seems more resigned than traditionally conclusive. The third work on this CD is
Weinberg’s fourth and final Chamber Symphony, which dates to 1992 and was the
last work he completed. It is designated, rather curiously, as being for
clarinet, triangle and string orchestra, but anyone expecting ample use of the
triangle will be disappointed: it appears only four times, all in the finale.
There is nothing concerto-like about the clarinet’s part here (as there is in,
say, Shostakovich’s 1933 piano-and-trumpet concerto, in which the trumpet has a
prominent role): Weinberg’s work remains basically one for strings, with
clarinet obbligato and triangle, as
noted, providing just a few special touches. Structurally, the work is in four
movements, but the movements are all played without pause, as are the different
sections within each movement, leading to the feeling of a work consisting of a
single half-hour-plus movement. There is particularly strong contrast – nicely
managed by Jurowski – between the slow, subtly disturbed, often barely
motionless first movement and the very hectic second, in which the clarinet is
prominent. The third movement is again in thoughtful mode, while the fourth has
some particularly effective writing for the upper strings and a mood that
repeatedly strives for the upbeat but never quite achieves it. Like the
clarinet sonata, this work ends in resignation – here, with string pizzicati and a triangle chime. The
chamber symphony’s very beginning is marked Lento,
its very end Adagissimo, and its pace
is mostly moderate-to-slow, producing an overall feeling more of nostalgia and
roads not taken than of anguish or deep despair. It is a rather strange
peroration, but no odder (and in fact rather less odd) than Shostakovich’s
final symphony, No. 15 (1971). This whole CD is a welcome opportunity not only
to become acquainted with additional intriguing music by Weinberg but also to
hear how skillfully he could interweave a solo clarinet into the totality of
works in which his style comes through quite clearly.
The Violin Concerto by Alicia Terzian
(born 1934), featured on a new Navona CD, is another 20th-century concerto,
dating to 1954-55. It falls quite early in Terzian’s output, in contrast to the
comparatively late date for Weinberg’s concerto for clarinet. Yet Terzian’s
work already shows her considerable skill in using the orchestra and
contrasting it with the solo violin, whose part is quite difficult without
possessing show-off qualities for their own sake. The first and longest
movement has a sonic palette familiar from much mid-20th-century
music, and engages in microtonalism to a certain extent, but its lyricism is
something of a throwback – and a pleasant one. This movement’s cadenza, which
Rafael Gintoli handles with sensitivity and skill, requires harmonics,
double-stopping and the ability to reach the violin’s highest register without
any loss of tonal quality – a considerable challenge. Terzian is Argentinian
but of Armenian descent, and Armenian folk tunes find their way into many of
her works, including this concerto, whose second movement is based on a gloomy
folksong, presented with quiet sadness and considerable feeling. The finale
provides a strong contrast, offering some complex violin figurations amid
underlying, brass-heavy dance rhythms. There is a kind of lumbering quality to
the orchestral part, creating a strong contrast with the more-flighty solo
passages, with the entirety eventually resolved – after another elaborate
cadenza that Gintoli delivers adeptly and with much feeling – in a speedy race
that at last has soloist and ensemble supporting and dancing around each other.
This is not a well-known concerto by any means, and Terzian herself feels she
has long since moved beyond the musical approach in evidence here. But the
concerto holds together very well indeed, and is worthy of being heard more
frequently. Vladimir Lande and the Siberian State Symphony Orchestra make fine
partners for Gintoli, and the performance as a whole is thoroughly satisfying. Lande
and the orchestra’s string section do equally well with Three Pieces for Strings, which dates to exactly the same time as
the concerto (1954). The Armenian folk influence is even stronger here than in
the concerto, even when the specific tunes are not drawn directly from Armenian
folk music. The three pieces are all intended to evoke scenes: “Sunset Song,”
“Pastoral with Variations,” and “Rustic Dance.” The titles fit the music
closely. The first piece flows with gentle nostalgia and has a crepuscular
quality that is enhanced by fairly mild dissonances. The second opens with an
old-fashioned-sounding theme that Terzian says dates to medieval times. The
variations are straightforward, well-constructed and nicely contrasted among
themselves. The third piece is a short (two-minute), rather Bartókian dance, strongly
rhythmic but with a stop-and-start quality that gives it a kind of angular
quality resolved, at the end, with a speed and decisiveness somewhat
reminiscent of the conclusion of the great Hungarian composer’s Concerto for Orchestra – albeit on a far
more modest scale. This is a highly satisfying release of music possessing considerable
power and communicative substance, performed with élan and giving listeners
interested in music of the 20th century a chance to hear some
particularly well-made examples of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment