Bad Princess: True Tales from Behind the Tiara. By Kris Waldherr.
Scholastic. $12.99.
Free as a Bird: The Story of Malala. By Lina Maslo.
Balzer+Bray/HarperCollins. $17.99.
Authors of fact-based books for young
readers inevitably have to confront the fact that a great deal of real life is
unpleasant in the extreme – even deadly. How much of that to reveal in books
aimed at children is a difficult question, and saying “it depends on the age
targeted by the book” is at best an imperfect answer. However, it certainly
does seem more appropriate to delve into greater detail in a book for preteen
readers, such as Bad Princess, than
in one aimed at ages 4-8, such as Free as
a Bird. The difficulty in both cases is translating the general “more or
less detail” notion into specific writing that will interest readers and draw
them in without horrifying or frightening them – while at the same time not
glossing over everything potentially upsetting. Kris Waldherr handles this
issue in Bad Princess by framing his
factual anecdotes with fairy-tale notions of what it means to be a princess and
whether there is any real-world value to the notion of “happily ever after.”
And despite the book’s deliberately provocative title, only some of the royals
he discusses would be considered “bad” by the standards of their time or ours.
For example, Waldherr writes of Princess Margaret Fredkulla of Sweden (c.
1080-1130) that she did all that was expected of her: “Arranged marriage. Check. Moving around from country to
country. Check. Creating peace. Check. Ruling a kingdom. Check. Providing the king with heirs to
his throne. Double check.” So by what
standards might Margaret be considered “bad”? There really are none, and all
Waldherr can muster is, “Was Margaret happy? Who knows?” In other cases, there
is no doubt the woman portrayed was horrible. The terrifying tale of Elizabeth
Báthory (1560-1614) is an example. She was responsible for the deaths of hundreds
of young girl servants, perhaps more than 600 – for no certain reason, although
there are longstanding rumors that she bathed in their blood to try to preserve
her own youth. However, she was not a princess – a matter that Waldherr glosses
over in the name of retelling her story. Waldherr also tries with little
success to lighten matters up in writing about Báthory, noting that after her
crimes came to light, “she was walled up for the rest of her life in her castle
chamber without Internet – and hopefully without a mirror.” Waldherr never
seems quite sure of what points he wants to make with his brief biographies,
beyond the obvious one that real life has little in common with fairy tales as
they are known today (the original tales, far darker and far scarier, are
another matter). Waldherr does not delve only into tales of times long past. He
discusses the “dollar princesses” of the 19th century, whose wealth
allowed them to marry titled men with blue blood but little money. And he
contrasts the comparative happiness of ones such as Lady Jennie Churchill
(1854-1921), whose “first years of…marriage [to Lord Randolph Churchill] were
blissful,” with the misery of Consuelo Vanderbilt (1877-1964), whose mother
pushed her into a horrible royal union and told her, “I do the thinking, you do
as you are told.” There are also pages on 20th-century princesses
Diana (1961-1997) and Grace (1929-1982). Bad
Princess is not all about princesses and not all about bad royals of any
title, and the word “bad” is a loaded one in any case, often depending on
judging people of one time by the standards of a different one. The book’s
once-over-lightly treatment of royal life may counter the standards of
sanitized fairy tales, if anyone actually believes them, but it sheds little
light on the lives and times of the people Waldherr profiles.
Lina Maslo’s Free as a Bird profiles a single person, Malala Yousafzai of
Pakistan, the youngest-ever person to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize (she
shared the 2014 prize with Kailash Satyarthi,
an Indian children's-rights activist). The difficulty Maslo faces in telling Malala’s
story, and it is a major one, is that Malala won the prize because she survived
a vicious attempted murder by Islamic killers determined to prevent her and other
girls from committing the “crime” of becoming educated. The Taliban mass
murderers, like the similar Daesh murder cult sometimes known as “Islamic
State,” care more about death than anything else, and it was death they sought
to bring to Malala – and almost succeeded in giving to her. But the word
“Taliban” appears nowhere in the main part of Maslo’s book, the word “Islamic”
is not there, and Maslo turns Malala’s story into a kind of
unequal-rights-for-no-known-reason tale. This is understandable in a book for
very young readers, but it creates puzzlements for its intended audience that
parents will have to find ways to handle. For instance, Maslo writes that
Malala “realized that women in Pakistan did not have the same rights as men.”
Why not? Maslo does not say. She writes about Malala taking part in
public-speaking contests at school and says that, at some point, “a new enemy
came to Pakistan.” What enemy? What does this have to do with the
already-existing differences between women’s and men’s rights? Again, Maslo
does not say, clearly trying to avoid the word Islam or bring religion – the
foundation of all the violence and viciousness in this tale – into the picture.
As for Malala almost being murdered by the Islamic fanatics, all Maslo says is
that “the day came when [her father] could not protect her,” and then there is
a wordless two-page abstract illustration made with red, black and blue. There
is not even the indication of a sound. “What happened?” is sure to be any young
child’s question at this point – but Maslo does not say. She has Malala
sleeping and dreaming for a week, then awakening in a British hospital and
being told “that the enemy had tried to end her life.” Why? Maslo does not say.
The remainder of the book, in which Malala travels the world speaking out for
girls and for others held voiceless by Islamic murderers and others, is upbeat
and effective, and Maslo’s illustrations give Malala an understated heroism
that fits the personality of this young women (born in 1997) very well. The Author’s
Note at the back of the book provides a timeline and at last uses the word
Taliban to explain who the “enemy” unnamed in the main story is. Parents unfamiliar
with Malala’s story will want to read this explanatory material before allowing
young children to tackle the main tale on their own: Maslo’s writing is
age-appropriate, but her determination not to frighten her intended audience
too greatly makes Free as a Bird less
clear and less understandable than it could be. Sometimes, as here, an author bends
over backwards a bit too far in trying to sanitize real-world horrors in the
name of bringing a tale of heroism to children who are just becoming able to
read books on their own.
No comments:
Post a Comment