Our Year of War: Two Brothers,
Vietnam, and a Nation Divided. By Daniel P. Bolger. Da Capo. $28.
The Unspeakable Loss: How Do You
Live after a Child Dies? By Nisha Zenoff, Ph.D. Da Capo. $16.99.
It is somewhat difficult to
figure out the intended audience for Daniel P. Bolger’s Our Year of War. Bolger has a unique perspective on modern warfare
– he retired as an Army lieutenant general after 35 years of service – and he
writes well about battlefield strategy and about tactics that work and that, in
his view, do not. And he has an intriguing story to tell in focusing on two
Nebraska brothers who fought in Vietnam at the same time but came away with
very different views of the war and very different postwar careers. One is
Chuck Hagel, a strong war supporter who was a Nebraska senator from 1997 to
2009 and served as President Obama’s Secretary of Defense from 2013 to 2015.
The other is Tom Hagel, who turned strongly against the conflict and, after
serving, taught at Dayton University School of Law from 1982 to 2015. The
brothers’ war experiences range from protecting each other’s life when under
fire to getting into a postwar fistfight that led to their determination never
to discuss the war again. But Our Year of
War is in fact a 336-page discussion, albeit one mediated by an expert on
the topic. And it really is primarily a focus on the war – there is some
discussion of the brothers’ prewar and postwar lives, but more of that would
have produced a more-nuanced story. Vietnam was a conflict that bitterly
divided the United States, or (depending on one’s viewpoint) reflected bitter
divisions that were already present and growing. Bolger’s book recalls the time
of the war but never fully explores that deep bitterness or the frequent
violence caused by or reflective of it. His focus is the military campaigns in
Vietnam, which he uses the Hagels’ experiences to illuminate – and the failures
of the military to understand the nature of the war and respond to it
accordingly. Thus, Bolger spends some time picking apart General William
Westmoreland’s failings, notably including the way he missed seeing the Tet
Offensive of 1968 as a turning point. This is, to some extent,
general-vs.-general writing; but at the same time, Our Year of War explores, albeit rather superficially, the way the
Vietnam conflict tore families apart and brought even close relatives such as
the Hagel brothers literally to blows. Yet the question remains: why rake over
these particular coals yet again? So much has been written about Vietnam, about
the horrible assassinations that occurred during it (notably those of Martin
Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy), and about the terrible things done by
Americans to the people they were supposedly protecting (including iconic
photos of a man shooting another in the head, of napalmed children running
desperately down a road, and many more). Why more? Why now? Bolger has valuable
insight into how the military operates – and, not coincidentally, a good
understanding of the gap between the people who fight on the front lines and
the ones back home who order them to the killing fields. But the overall
impression left by Our Year of War is
that of bringing back an extremely divisive, painful time in United States
history for no particularly valuable reason beyond having a good story to tell
and the ability to tell it.
The national pain of Vietnam
was reflected time and again in the pain of individual families whose members
died or were permanently damaged physically and/or psychologically by the war.
But pain of this depth and extent does not require wartime to devastate those
who experience it. Nisha Zenoff, whose son died after falling 700 feet during a
hike in Yosemite, tries in The Unspeakable
Loss to offer what the book’s second subtitle describes as “Support,
Guidance, and Wisdom from Others Who Have Been There.” To do that, she has to
probe deeply into some of the most horrific trauma imaginable – and while she
does so with sensitivity, her book is very, very difficult to read, perhaps
impossibly so for those who have experienced what Zenoff herself did. There is
not just a single reliving of one’s own profoundly horrendous experience in
these pages – there are multiple ones, presented by a wide variety of parents
who have outlived their children and are trying, some of them desperately, to
find a method of going on and reasons to do so. It was not always so: families
used to have far more children than most in the developed world have today,
precisely because so few young people would ever grow up – disease and
accidents carried off so many of them. But in a safer world and one with far
better medical care (notably including antibiotics), parents expect each child
to survive and thrive, and when a child’s life is cut short, the intensity of
the reaction is enormous – as Zenoff shows through the stories and quotations
in this book. Each of the book’s four parts begins with Zenoff recounting
something from her own experience, making this a highly personal book as well
as an instructive one written by a psychotherapist and grief counselor. The
titles of the four parts, though, show just how hard the book will be to read:
“Can I Survive?” “Will My Family Survive?” “One Year and Beyond: Where Am I Now?”
“As the Years Go By, What Can I Expect?” And while the progress of the book’s
parts shows that there is a future after a child’s death, the many sections
within each part, each introduced by a question, will force readers to confront
trauma and the deepest possible grief over and over and over again: “Will life
ever feel worth living again?” “How can anyone know what I feel?” “How can I
maintain my faith in God when I feel so angry?” “How can I be there for my
other children when I’m so preoccupied and in such pain?” “How can we feel
sexual now?” “How can we get through the holidays?” “What if I find myself
working, eating, or drinking too much?” This small sampling of questions shows
that nothing is off limits to Zenoff, who after all has experienced this
horrible grief herself and is also a professional at helping others get through
it. But the book is very difficult
reading, particularly so for women, at whom it is primarily aimed: Zenoff says
that although “grief is deep and long-lasting for men as well as women,” men
often “quickly retreat into work and hobbies” in “a more ‘male’ model of
coping.” Whether or not all readers will accept this is not the point: it is
how Zenoff sees things and how she and her patients have experienced them, and
she is trying in The Unspeakable Loss
to give other bereaved women the benefit of the experience through which she
herself has gone and through which she has helped many others. The goal is
admirable and the handling of the material is sensitive and shows great care,
but there is no way to sugar-coat any of what Zenoff brings forward in this
book. It is an effective, methodically explanatory prescription for survival
after a child’s death, but it is also bitter, bitter medicine that will not, in
any way, shape or form, go down easily.
No comments:
Post a Comment