The Virtuoso Ophicléide: Music of
Jules Demersseman, Victor Caussinus, Mikhail Glinka, Claude Philippe Projean,
Gilbert Duprez, Gaspard Kummer, Hyacinthe Klosé and Albert Corbin.
Trio ÆNEA (Patrick Wibart, ophicléide;
Adrien Ramon, cornet; Lucie Sansen, piano); Corentin Moran and Oscar Abella
Martín, ophicléides; Jean-Yves
Guéry, Gregorian chant.
Ricercar. $18.99.
Bruckner: Symphony No. 5.
London Symphony Orchestra conducted by Lance Friedel. MSR Classics. $18.95
(SACD).
Schubert: Two Films by
Christopher Nupen—The Trout; The Greatest Love and the Greatest Sorrow.
Christopher Nupen Video DVD. $29.99.
Otherwise unrelated, these
releases provide so much sheer pleasure in so many expected and unexpected ways
that they are worthwhile acquisitions for any classical-music lover, even if he
or she already owns the repertoire. However, “already owns” is actually out of
the question when it comes to The
Virtuoso Ophicléide, one of the most fascinating classical discs to be
released in quite some time. The story of the ophicléide (not always spelled
with the accent, as it is here) is that of the serpent: ophi comes the Greek for “serpent” and cleide from the Greek for “keys.” The ophicléide, invented in 1817,
was indeed created as an easier-to-play, wider-range version of the serpent, a
uniquely shaped and uniquely difficult-to-manage older instrument that was much
used in church music: its sound aside, the notion of the “serpent” held
responsible for the Fall supporting religious works undoubtedly pleased the
clergy. A number of well-known composers wrote works that included the ophicléide:
Berlioz, Mendelssohn, Spontini (the first to use it, in his opera Olimpie), Verdi, Wagner, Meyerbeer,
Saint-Saëns, Auber and others.
But the awkwardness and difficulty of producing a smooth, rounded tone
throughout its range eventually doomed the ophicléide, which was supplanted for
some purposes by the euphonium and for others by the tuba. Yet the ophicléide’s
sound is quite different from that of those later instruments, and in highly
knowledgeable and skilled hands such as those of Patrick Wibart, the instrument
is absolutely fascinating to hear. Hence the Ricercar CD featuring ophicléide
works by eight composers – not a single great or near-great work in the bunch,
true, but the sheer delight of the sound of the ophicléide (in some cases more
than one), with or without cornet and Erard piano, more than makes up for the
“salon” quality of the music heard here. Only two of these composers are at all
well-known. Glinka’s Trio pathetique
is the longest work here – and is reasonably familiar when heard as it usually
is, on clarinet, bassoon and piano. It does not fit its title very well, nor
does it fit Glinka’s Russian-folk-music reputation, so it is not terribly
popular; but on cornet, ophicléide and piano, it makes a fascinating aural
impression, if never one of depth. The only other composer here with whom
listeners may be familiar is Jules Demersseman (1833-1866), a virtuoso flautist
whose interest in new instruments of his time led him to write some of the
earliest known music for saxophone. Here he is represented by two very
well-made and intriguing works labeled Fantaisie,
one of them based on a waltz that at the time was attributed to Beethoven but
was actually derived from a Schubert tune. The other pieces here are less
musically distinguished but still, one and all, worth hearing for the rarity and
unusual quality of the experience. There are works by Victor Caussinus
(1806-1899), who produced a highly important method for playing the ophicléide;
Gaspard Kummer (1795-1870); Hyacinthe Klosé (1808-1880); and Albert Corbin (?-1893), whose cornet-and- ophicléide
Fantasie called Teutatès
is particularly memorable. The remaining three items on the disc remind
listeners of the serpentine background and religious attachment of the ophicléide.
There are two three-ophicléide arrangements of Agnus Dei and O Salutaris
by Gilbert Duprez (1806-1896); and there is an especially intriguing Kyrie eleison pour trois ophicléides by
Claude Philippe Projean (fl. 1843), with the instruments lending an
otherworldly quality to the singing of Jean-Yves Guéry. Extended and excellent booklet notes by Jérôme Lejeune complement the first-rate playing by all the
musicians, and the release as a whole – despite the limitations of its
repertoire – is one that listeners will surely return to again and again for
immersion in a vanished but still bracing sonic world.
The wonderful SACD sound of
a new MSR Classics release of Bruckner’s Symphony No. 5 is one of the disc’s
many pleasures, but it is by no means the most important one. Lance Friedel is
scarcely a name identified with Bruckner – indeed, Friedel is not a
particularly well-known conductor at all – but if this, his first Bruckner
recording, is any indication, he is going to be a force to be reckoned with in
Bruckner interpretation, and sooner rather than later. What could possess a
conductor to choose the Fifth for his first foray into Bruckner recording? An
unusual and highly complex symphony, even by Bruckner’s standards, it is the
composer’s second longest (after the Eighth), the only one that opens with a separate
slow introduction, and arguably the most tightly knit at all, with distinctions
such as its use of the identical slow opening in the first and fourth
movements. Highly innovative in ways that are very difficult to bring out in
performance, the Fifth is a tough nut to crack even for experienced Bruckner
conductors. Friedel, however, absolutely takes its measure – and brings to it
both passionate involvement and a level of intellectual understanding that
shines forth both in the performance and in the booklet notes that he himself
provides. This is a simply marvelous reading: tempo after tempo feels exactly
right and seems to lead inexorably to the next, as if of course the music should flow just this way and no other; the
building blocks of the symphony fall into place with an unforced naturalness
that pulls listeners in at the very quiet start and never lets them go until
the resounding conclusion; and the structural surprises of the work – such as the
use of the same notes, in very different tempos, to start the slow movement and
Scherzo – are accepted in matter-of-fact fashion that only serves to highlight
them more effectively. This is the opposite of turgid Bruckner – indeed, if
there is a flaw in the performance, it is the relatively thin sound of the
strings when compared with those of the best German and Austrian orchestras.
This is music by Bruckner the almost-classicist, Bruckner the melodic successor
to Schubert, more than it is by Bruckner the Wagner-style symphonist. Like any
Bruckner interpretation, this one will not please everyone – the very cleanness
of the London Symphony Orchestra’s sound may seem to some to be at odds with
the monumental nature of the symphony. But this reading will intrigue even listeners who may not
fully accept Friedel’s approach, and that ability to make listeners think as
well as feel is what makes Friedel such a special conductor and this release
such a special one.
And speaking of Schubert, a
new DVD from Christopher Nupen Video is an almost perfect example of how good
classical music can be when presented in visual as well as auditory form. Classical
DVDs, including movies about classical music and musicians, all too often come
across as distractions. Recordings of performances, in particular, force viewers
to look where the director wants them to look; and no matter how good the
director may be, this creates a very different experience from the one an
audience has at an actual concert, where audience members make their own
decisions about where to look and how to listen. This release of two Schubert
films, however, shows how good a visual recording of classical-music experience
can be, and in so doing sets a
standard to which other DVDs will have difficulty living up. The reason they
will have problems is that the core of the first film included here, by far the
best thing on the whole DVD, can never be reproduced: it is a performance of
Schubert’s “Trout” Quintet by the amazing combination of Daniel Barenboim,
Itzhak Perlman, Pinkhas Zukerman, Jacqueline du Pré and Zubin Mehta. The musicians were all very young indeed when
the film of The Trout was made, in
1969 (the film itself was first shown on the BBC in 1970); du Pré, tragically, was to live only until
1987, and the other performers were to move on to careers in which chamber
music played at most a small part. But here they shine, they sparkle, they
mingle and cooperate and converse (musically as well as in words), and they
bring out the manifest beauties of Schubert’s wonderful score with such
apparently effortless virtuosity that all a listener/viewer can do is sit back,
watch and listen and marvel. This is an outstanding performance of the quintet,
which is the climax of a film that otherwise proceeds in fairly straightforward
fashion by following the preparations for the concert. The shooting and editing
of the film are first-rate, but the approach and content are not especially
distinctive: it is the performance itself that is the draw here, and it is so
fine that the rest of the visual material, even at its best, fades into
insignificance as soon as the actual performing begins. The second film on this
DVD, The Greatest Love and the Greatest
Sorrow, was made more than 20 years later and, like The Trout, was a prize winner (the earlier film in 1973, the later
one in 1994). Taken strictly as a film, it is actually better than The Trout, exploring as it does the
musical accomplishments of Schubert in the final 20 months of his all-too-short
life. Schubert himself wondered how anyone could compose after Beethoven, but
it was Schubert who showed the way for music to move on, even if the works most
distinguished in that regard – such as his “Great” C Major symphony – were not
performed in his lifetime. What The
Greatest Love and the Greatest Sorrow does is to look, almost without
exception, at Schubert’s music written between Beethoven’s death in 1827 and
Schubert’s a year and a half later. This is a rather arbitrary structural
device, since some of Schubert’s forward-looking work (that is, music that
looked beyond Beethoven) was written while Beethoven was still alive, but as an
organizing principle, it works well. The film begins with Beethoven’s funeral
and retains throughout a solemnity and intensity that contrast very strongly
with the playfulness and joy of The Trout
as shown both in its rehearsal antics and in the expressions of the performers
during the quintet itself. In The Greatest
Love and the Greatest Sorrow, Schubert’s own voice (from his letters) and
his music are artfully combined to make the case for him as a member of the
very highest pantheon of composers. There are 16 Schubert pieces here, from
piano music performed by Vladimir Ashkenazy to songs sung by baritone Andreas
Schmidt. This is a slow-paced and contemplative film, 50% longer than the 55
minutes of The Trout, and its primary
impression is one of serenity and very deliberate artfulness – perhaps a touch
too much, notably at the very end, which features an archival recording of
Lotte Lehmann singing Im Abendrot
above an image of the setting sun. Less readily accessible than The Trout and of greater interest to
listeners already familiar with Schubert (and with Christopher Nupen’s films in
general), The Greatest Love and the
Greatest Sorrow is a quietly powerful film that pairs well with The Trout because of the two works’
differences, not the least of which is that the earlier film is far more likely
to be of interest to a wide audience. There is a self-limiting quality to The Greatest Love and the Greatest Sorrow
that Nupen quite obviously intends: it is a beautiful film for people already
captivated by the beauties of Schubert’s music. The Trout will also appeal to people who may know little or nothing
of Schubert but are open to discovering that classical works can be out-and-out
fun. Together, the films make a highly noteworthy – and note-filled – DVD.
No comments:
Post a Comment