The Story of Seeds: From Mendel’s
Garden to Your Plate, and How There’s More of Less to Eat around the World.
By Nancy F. Castaldo. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. $17.99.
A polemic in the guise of a
documentary, Nancy F. Castaldo’s The
Story of Seeds hides, behind its innocuous primary title, the instincts and
approach of a Michael Moore film. Selective in presenting information and
omitting extremely important facts that do not gibe with its underlying
opinions, the book takes readers through a First World analysis of biodiversity
while purporting to represent the interests of Third World nations.
“Why plant heirlooms?”
Castaldo asks at one point, offering three unconvincing reasons before getting
to her real answer. First she says heirlooms offer a variety of tastes (true)
and “in some cases” have higher nutritional content than modern varieties – but
“some cases” is scarcely a major rationale. Next she says heirloom seeds grow
true to type every year, but hybrid seeds “might not” do so – again, scarcely a
strong statement. Then she says heirlooms “are usually quite hardy,” with
“usually” being the operative word (and an arguable one). Finally, she gets to
what she really wants to say: “Heirlooms come with stories that are continued
and added to by farmers who plant them. They are a legacy that is given to us
from the past and that we give to the future.” This is a perfect example of noblesse oblige, entirely ignoring the
soaring populations of Third World countries and their desperate need for far
larger and more-reliable crop yields than “heirloom” varieties of seeds are
capable of providing.
Castaldo’s main argument is
that modern seeds are produced by evil corporations that actually make profits from doing so. And she is right
to be angered – from a certain perspective, anyway – at the excesses of
corporate protectiveness toward their products. But corporations are not
social-service agencies, and after spending hundreds of millions of
research-and-development dollars, cannot reasonably be expected to give away
what those dollars created. Castaldo prefers to focus on tales of individual
heroism and warmth rather than take an overview of the world’s need for food;
as a result, The Story of Seeds
includes some interesting stories of people, from genetic pioneer Gregor Mendel
to seed collector Nikola Vavilov to Iraqi seed-bank scientist Sanaa Abdul Wahab
El Sheikh. Castaldo presents the stories of “seed warriors” who are currently
alive in a uniformly positive way, openly applauding someone who “speaks about
a food revolution, a return to growing and eating genetically pure food,” never
considering the underlying reasons for the increasing dominance of hybrid and
human-produced seeds over “heirloom” varieties, and never ever allowing anyone
from an agribusiness to make any positive comment about the corporations whose
products now feed so much of the world.
The problem with Castaldo’s
Moore-like approach is the same as that of Moore himself: extreme tunnel
vision. Corporations did not develop new hybrid seed varieties because they are
evil entities determined to undercut heirloom growers. They developed them out
of a pressing need to help feed a world population that currently numbers more
than 7.4 billion and continues to grow. That
issue, the population issue, is the proverbial elephant in the room of
agriculture, and one that Castaldo – who lives in a rural part of the United
States and maintains a plot in a local community garden – resolutely refuses to
address. Nicely appointed heirloom-seed sales locations in the United States
are thoroughly irrelevant to feeding the 1.4 billion people of China, the 1.3
billion of India, and so on. Perhaps Castaldo would care to explain how to feed
the world, in which so many already go hungry, without the use of seeds that
were created specifically to address the need for greater and more-reliable
productivity, even though at the expense of dietary variety? Perhaps not.
There are certainly abuses
in agribusiness, and certainly practices that are ethically questionable, if
not clearly abusive. But that is a nuanced view, and there is as little room
for nuance in The Story of Seeds as
in a Moore movie. Instead, to cite just one egregious example among many, Castaldo
uses the fact that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was once an attorney
for Monsanto to imply, wholly without basis, that the Supreme Court is somehow
in Monsanto’s pocket because of a unanimous
decision it rendered relating to patent law. And Castaldo tends to get so
carried away by her own rhetoric that she makes statements that simply do not
make sense: “When I was a baby my mother noticed that the color of my skin had
turned a weird color.” “Years ago scientists grouped everything living thing
into two kingdoms – plants and animals.” Castaldo seems sincere in her concerns
about biodiversity and attempts to re-establish a greater genetic variety of
seeds to hand down to future generations. But she never really escapes a
certain moral haughtiness and self-aggrandizement of privilege that lead her
largely to ignore the plight of the millions and millions of people in Africa,
Asia and elsewhere who would be justified in telling Castaldo and other
well-meaning First World advocates what Bertolt Brecht encapsulated so well
(albeit in an admittedly different context and for different purposes) in The Threepenny Opera: “Erst
kommt das Fressen, dann kommt die Moral.” Food first – morals (and moralizing) later.
No comments:
Post a Comment