What Pet Should I Get? By Dr.
Seuss. Random House. $17.99.
Prince Fly Guy. By Tedd
Arnold. Cartwheel Books/Scholastic. $6.99.
How Rude! 10 Real Bugs Who Won’t
Mind Their Manners. By Heather L. Montgomery. Illustrated by Howard
McWilliam. Scholastic. $4.99.
Frog on a Log? By Kes Gray.
Illustrations by Jim Field. Scholastic. $16.99.
The discovery of anything
new – that is, previously unknown – by Dr. Seuss is cause for great joy, even
if what is discovered is (how to say this?) in somewhat less than perfect
shape. What Pet Should I Get? has the
makings of a wonderful Dr. Seuss book but is clearly an unfinished draft – one
that conceivably led to the creation of One
Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish, since it features the same
brother-and-sister pair and appears to date to the same time period (late
1950s/early 1960s). Random House has done a wonderful job of presenting the
book, including a colorizing approach that both puts it in historical context
and updates it – not that kids will be interested in that. What they will enjoy is seeing the brother and sister meet a wide
variety of potential pets in a pet shop (a standard place to get pets at the
time the book was created, but no longer a recommended one – as end notes from
the publisher point out). What they are less likely to enjoy is the comparative
absence of Seussian cadences in the writing – a sure sign that this is an
unfinished manuscript. In other words, although much of the poetry scans
perfectly, much does not. One example among quite a few: “I might find a new
one./ A fast kind of thing/ who would fly round my head/ in a ring on a
string!/ Yes, that would be fun, BUT/ our house is so small./ This thing on a
string/ would bump, bump into the wall!” The second “bump” there clearly does
not belong and would never have appeared in a finished Seuss book; or “bump,
bump” could have stayed while “into” might have been changed to “on.” Or: “So,
maybe some other/ good kind of pet./ Another kind maybe/ is what we should
get.” Here there is a missing “a” in the second line, which should read “good
kind of a pet” to have the right number of syllables – assuming Dr. Seuss would
not have rewritten the passage altogether. Also, the book contains two
identical “Make Up Your Mind” pages – exactly the same art both times – and
that is scarcely a typical Seuss approach. Does all this matter? Well, yes and
no. Seussian purists have the right to quibble about issues like these, but the
incomplete nature of What Pet Should I
Get? scarcely diminishes its enjoyable elements for the young children for
whom it was and is intended. For them, this is a delicious adventure amid many
sorts of real-world pets and a typically Seussian smorgasbord of nonexistent
creatures. The art is a joy to behold, the “make up your mind” theme takes the
book beyond a simple pet-buying expedition, and the final page – when the kids
say they have chosen a pet and are taking it home, but it is left up to readers
to figure out what they have picked – is thought-provoking in just the way for
which Dr. Seuss was justly renowned. What
Pet Should I Get? is scarcely one of the best Dr. Seuss books, but it is
delightful nevertheless, a reminder – nearly a quarter of a century after the
good doctor’s departure – that even before he put his material into final form,
Dr. Seuss was one of a kind.
One pet not suggested in What Pet Should I Get? is a fly – a “yent,”
yes, and a “tall pet who fits in a space that is small,” but not a fly. A fly
is, however, the pet of Buzz in the always-amusing Fly Guy series by Tedd
Arnold, which rambles into fairy-tale territory in Prince Fly Guy. Buzz has a homework assignment of writing a fairy
tale, so he tosses ideas at Fly Guy, who imagines himself in the roles Buzz
conjures up. Seeing Arnold’s portrayal of Fly Guy as an ugly troll, smelly pig
herder, or hairy dwarf is good for some laughs, and the fairy tale that Buzz
eventually creates – with Fly Guy’s enthusiastic approval (“Yezz!”) – is good
for some more. In it, Fly Guy is a handsome prince who rescues a beautiful fly
princess but is chased by a mean giant (a human adult carrying a fly swatter).
The two flies drive him away and, of course, live happily ever after – a conclusion
that pleases Buzz so much that he decides to write another fairy tale, which
begins as inauspiciously for Fly Guy as the first but will presumably (after
the book’s conclusion) turn out just as well. Arnold’s series, in which it
often seems that Buzz is Fly Guy’s pet rather than the other way around, is
always amusing and sometimes genuinely clever. And two of the 15 entries have
become Theodor Seuss Geisel Honor Books – an enjoyable connection tying Arnold
to Dr. Seuss.
There is, however, nothing
Seussian in the treatment that insects get in Heather L. Montgomery’s How Rude! This is essentially a science
book – it starts with Montgomery explaining the difference between complete
metamorphosis (egg, larva, pupa, adult) and incomplete metamorphosis (egg,
nymph, adult). But even on that page, the focus is on Howard McWilliam’s
illustrations, which have bugs looking and talking like people and dealing with
issues that are designed to engage kids through sheer grossness: “Some bugs
litter. Some pass gas. Others throw poop.” The statements are quite true, and
the scientific reasons for them are explained in each discussion of an insect;
but the presentation is intended to use anthropomorphized art and dramatic
“ugh” elements to get kids to pay attention to the science. Each bug gets a “Gross-o-Meter
Manners Meter” whose six sections are marked “nauseating, repulsive, atrocious,
shocking, rude, nasty.” Each gets a suitably exclamatory introductory line: “The
tortoise beetle larva wears poop!” And each gets an illustration intended to
show human children just how yucchy each bug’s behavior is – by human
standards, of course. At the same time, each presentation includes a photo
showing what the real insect looks like, gives its common and scientific names,
and in a box called “the real deal” explains why it behaves as it does. The
large-size cartoon illustrations and sensationalized headlines and text are far
more intriguing than the real-world stuff here, which may make some kids step
back from the science altogether and look at the book as simply an “ewwww!”
experience. But hopefully they will return to it again (and again), even if
just to see the bizarre pictures (such as one showing a family of American
burying beetles at the drive-through window of “Barfey’s”), and eventually
check out the facts offered here. If they do that, they will actually learn
something.
What the frog learns in Frog on a Log? is something he would
just as soon not know: he is required,
by the terms of children’s-book rhymes, to sit on a log, even though, as he
says, “logs are all hard and uncomfortable” and “can give you splinters.” Too
bad: frogs, in addition to eating bugs (including flies, one of which appears
on the cover, and many of the ones in How
Rude!), have no choice but to sit somewhere that rhymes. A knowledgeable
cat tells this to the frog, starting out by shouting “Hey, Frog!” at him (Kes
Gray’s book was originally published in England and was called Oi Frog! – which may not “translate”
well to American English but somehow fits the expression of Jim Field’s cat
perfectly). “You’re a frog, so you must sit on a log,” says the cat, who goes
on to explain that “only cats sit on mats,” “hares sit on chairs,” “mules sit
on stools,” and so on. The rhyming examples get increasingly absurd as the book
goes on: “lions sit on irons” (and look exceedingly uncomfortable doing so),
for example, and “parrots sit on carrots.” The whole book is a bit of a send-up
of the absurdities inherent in rhyme-seeking by authors of kids’ books, and
adults may get a kick out of that even as children simply enjoy the rhymes and
the absurd and very funny illustrations. Why is all this sitting-on-specific-things
necessary? wonders the frog, and the cat tells him, “It’s not about being
comfortable. …It’s about doing the right thing.” So fleas sit on peas, goats
sit on coats, storks sit on forks, gorillas sit on (ahem) pillars, rats sit on
hats, and on and on it goes, and where it will stop, nobody knows. Well,
actually Gray and Field know: it stops after puffins sit on muffins, gibbons
sit on ribbons, and dogs – sorry about that, says the cat, but dogs sit on frogs. And thus Frog on a Log? ends with the title character enlightened but
enduring a heavy burden upon his froggy body. A pure romp, Frog on a Log? is the sort of rhyme-based fun in which Dr. Seuss
(among other authors) delighted, and in which kids can still find joy aplenty.
No comments:
Post a Comment