Bach: The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book I. Kimiko Ishizaka, piano. Navona. $19.99 (2
CDs).
Busoni the Visionary, Volume III. Jeni Slotchiver, piano. Centaur. $15.99.
Hindemith: Piano Sonatas Nos. 1-3; Suite “1922.” David Korevaar, piano. MSR Classics.
$12.95.
Powerhouse Pianists II—Works for
Two Pianos. Stephen Gosling and Blair McMillen, pianos. AMR (American
Modern Recordings). $16.99.
Saint-Saëns: Piano Trios Nos. 1
and 2. Trio Latitude 41 (Bernadene Blaha, piano; Livia Sohn, violin; Luigi
Piovano, cello). Eloquentia. $21.98.
It is sheer enjoyment of the
sound of the piano and the abilities of its many modern virtuosi that will
drive listeners to a wide variety of recent recordings – more than, in some cases,
the music will. Kimiko Ishizaka’s version of the first book of Bach’s The
Well-Tempered Clavier will
of course be of interest to any lover of this transcendent music. But the
question listeners will ask is why we need another recording of this material
on piano rather than on the type of instrument for which Bach wrote the
material. What, specifically, does Ishizaka bring to the work that makes her
version worth considering amid all the others played by pianists – not to
mention those performed, with far greater authenticity, on harpsichord or
clavichord? The answer is that Ishizaka offers a firm intellectual
understanding of the music, coupled with the technical ability to keep the
musical lines clear and the willingness to eschew pedal use in order to bring
greater clarity to the music than it generally receives on piano. These
strengths, however, only bring into higher relief the reality that this sort of
clarity and contrapuntal attention are not the strengths of the type of instrument
Ishizaka plays, certainly not those of the Bösendorfer 280 concert grand
used in this recording – a piano with vastly more resonance and a far greater
span of notes than anything from Bach’s time. Ishizaka performs all this music
with care and obvious attentiveness, and attractively brings out many of its
lyrical moments without delving into entirely inappropriate Romantic-era
swooning. But the recording, although a feast for Ishizaka’s fans and those who
think Bach “sounds right” on piano, is not particularly compelling otherwise.
Those seeking their first recording of The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book I on piano should certainly consider it, but
those who already have one of the many fine versions currently available – or
who see no particular reason to hear this music on a modern concert grand in
the first place – can safely bypass Navona’s two-CD set.
The piano is certainly the right
instrument for the music of composer/pianist Ferruccio Busoni, and the third
volume of Jeni Slotchiver’s survey under the title Busoni the Visionary is a fascinating one for listeners interested
in this still-underrated composer. Ties between Bach and Busoni are many and
well-known, with Busoni not only transcribing a number of Bach’s works for
piano (which is not the same as simply playing them on a modern instrument) but
also creating his own works using Bach’s forms in both imitative and
developmental ways. There are bits of all this on Slotchiver’s new Centaur CD.
Busoni’s transcription of Prelude and
Triple Fugue in E-flat for Organ, BWV 552 (“St. Anne”) is the highlight of
the disc, monumental in its structure and enormously impressive in its design
and Slotchiver’s execution – and in Busoni’s knowing, intelligent transcription,
which both conveys the magnitude of the original organ work and produces a
fully satisfying piano piece. The other Bach-flavored works here, although of
lesser scope, are also impressive. Fantasia
nach Johann Sebastian Bach, written in memory of Busoni’s father, takes
Bachian musical ideas and transforms them, incorporating them into a new
structure that is far more free-flowing than Bach’s own music. It is a work
perhaps more worthy of intellectual appreciation than emotional involvement,
but is certainly an interesting experiment. Toccata
uses a form often employed by Bach for a work that is very much of the 20th
century, filled with drama and technical virtuosity and incorporating a central
Fantasia that is brooding and lyrical. This CD also contains three works with
no Bach ties at all. Ten Variations on a
Prelude of Chopin, from 1922, is refined and poetic, delicate and
altogether lighter than Busoni’s earlier (1884) variations and fugue on Chopin’s
work, from which this piece is derived. This work is in line with Busoni’s
mysticism, which is increasingly apparent in his late music, but this element
of Busoni’s creativity is even clearer in the two remaining works here: Prélude et Étude (en Arpèges), which
delves into a world of shimmering fantasy, and Nuit de Noël, intended as an expression of joy but coming across as
a rather restrained form of pleasure. The Bach-related works aside, this
release will be of interest mainly to those already following Slotchiver’s path
through Busoni’s piano music.
Hindemith, like Busoni, remains an
underrated composer, his vast skill, thoughtfulness and versatility generally
acknowledged but his music often thought of as intellectual rather than
gripping, and sometimes even turgid. While Hindemith’s piano sonatas will
certainly not be to all tastes, those seeking a particularly appealing
recording of them will very much enjoy David Korevaar’s performances on MSR
Classics. Hindemith wrote all three sonatas in a single year, 1936 – after he
had been denounced by the Nazis but before he felt forced to emigrate. The
first sonata, in five movements, shows Hindemith at his most lyrical: inspired
by a poem by Friedrich Hölderlin, it often feels more like a fantasy
than a classical sonata. The second sonata, which Hindemith considered closer
to a sonatina, is the slightest of the three, but there is a fair degree of
drama in its three movements – and Korevaar brings this out to especially fine
effect. The third sonata is in four movements and is the darkest of the works,
more serious than No. 2 and less lyrical and warm than No. 1. Its harmonic
tension is considerable and is a key to its effective interpretation, and
Korevaar brings it out with a sure hand (actually two sure hands). The CD also
includes Suite “1922,” a
five-movement work born of the same 1920s experimentalism that inspired such music
as Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 2. The movements are a march, nocturne, and three
based on popular pre-jazz dances – shimmy (a type of fox trot), Boston (a slow
jazzy waltz), and ragtime. This suite is quite different from the later
sonatas, treating the piano primarily as a percussion instrument and allowing
all sorts of clattering and crashing in the march, ragtime and outer sections
of the shimmy. Thick and cluttered with notes and chords, the music has little
in common with Hindemith’s later work – except in the nocturne (Nachtstück), which is
mostly quiet and melancholy. Infrequently heard even by the standards of
Hindemith’s music, Suite “1922” is
very much a work of its time – but also one whose brash ebullience listeners
may well find to be at odds with what they think they know of this composer’s creations.
Most of the composers on a
new AMR recording called Powerhouse
Pianists II will be even less familiar to listeners than Busoni or
Hindemith: Robert Paterson, Doug Opel, Amanda Harberg and Mary Ellen Childs are
scarcely household names in most households. Three composers represented on
this CD do, however, have fairly widespread reputations. John Corigliano’s Chiaroscuro uses two pianos tuned a
quarter-tone apart, resulting in dissonance that ranges from the subtle to the
extensive in a work whose expressive effects are more those of an intellectual
exercise (and something of an “in joke”) than a reaching-out to a wide
audience. John Adams’ Hallelujah Junction
offers Adams’ usual minimalism, which has worn rather thin by now but still has
many adherents. On the other hand, Frederic Rzewski’s Winnsboro Cotton Mill Blues, taken from his Four North American Ballads, is a showstopper in this two-piano
arrangement, filled with drama and industrial clangor and requiring tremendous
virtuosity of both pianists – which Stephen Gosling and Blair McMillen supply
in abundance. As for the rest of the disc, Paterson’s Deep Blue Ocean is a fairly straightforward mixture of tinkling notes
with block chords, a typical representation of water and its movements. Opel’s Dilukkenjon is fun – a word not often
applied to contemporary music – in its dueling-pianos scenario, whose
lighthearted intensity may remind some film-oriented listeners of the piano
competition between Donald and Daffy Duck in Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Harberg’s Subway is a New York City transit portrait that is all hustle and
bustle. It contrasts strongly with Childs’ Kilter,
a work of much simpler sonic texture with a much greater sense of mysticism. As
is often the case in anthology CDs of modern works, this is a recording with some
elements that will interest certain listeners and some that will interest
others, with no particular unifying feature except for the excellent pianism of
the two performers. It is the chance to hear two highly skilled players
performing in tandem that is the main attraction of the disc.
Those who prefer a far
mellower and more Romantic piano sound will get great pleasure from the Trio
Latitude 41 recording of Saint-Saëns’
two piano trios – a (++++) disc that fully justifies its presence on the
Eloquentia label. Bernadene Blaha, Livia Sohn and Luigi Piovano are indeed
eloquent in these two very different works, written nearly 30 years apart. The
first, in F, dates to 1863 and is the earliest Saint-Saëns work still played regularly today. This is music of subtle
charm and a pastoral cast, using deliberate rhythmic confusion (two beats vs. three)
to build the first movement – and including a hurdy-gurdy-like drone in the
second, followed by off-beat rhythms in the third that make the music sound
somewhat like a peasant dance. The piano really comes into its own in the
finale, initially seeming to accompany the strings until Saint-Saëns uses some delightful
sleight-of-hand to show that the piano is creating a melody and the strings are
in fact accompanying it. Making this movement effective in its subtlety can be
a significant challenge for performers; it is one to which Blaha, Sohn and
Piovano rise skillfully. The wit and brightness of this finale, which includes
dashing piano arpeggios, lead to a conclusion of great charm, in which this
performance is fully steeped. The second trio is quite different: written in E
minor in 1892, it is larger (five movements instead of four), longer and
considerably more serious than the earlier one. Structurally, the second trio
has extended outer movements enfolding shorter and generally lighter inner
ones, the overall effect being that of an arch. The opening movement is the
longest and in many ways the hardest to bring off successfully: the piano must
play a series of chords very lightly (something for which the modern concert
grand is ill equipped), and the pianist must maintain a delicate, almost airy
touch nearly throughout. The second movement is in 5/8 and 5/4 time, rarely
used by Saint-Saëns and
generally uncommon at the time; the movement sounds in some ways like the
second movement of Tchaikovsky’s “Pathétique,”
written a year later. Next comes a simple, rather straightforward slow
movement, then a graceful waltz, and finally a large movement of contrapuntal
complexity, with a fugue in the middle, in which the piano writing is
particularly virtuosic. Trio Latitude 41 makes a very strong case for the
disparate beauties of these two works, playing them with gusto and
understanding and providing considerable insight into the ways in which
Saint-Saëns, who has often been
accused of failing to develop much musically during his long career, in fact
refined and deepened his musical communication in ways that were very
significant indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment