It’s Complicated: The Social
Lives of Networked Teens. By danah boyd. Yale University Press. $25.
An apologia for teen
behavior and a book that is a mixture of the obvious and the unexpected,
presented at times with genuine insight and at others with overweening
self-importance that borders on arrogance, It’s
Complicated uses a combination of primary research and a large number of
comments by teenagers – all taken at face value – to try to explain just how,
why, to what extent and for what purpose today’s teens seem to remain
electronically in touch with themselves and the larger world practically all
the time.
There are some genuinely
fascinating insights here, but readers must decouple them from statements so
bland that it is hard to take them seriously: “Childhood has changed.”
“Learning is a lifelong process.” And it also helps to pass over lightly such
non-revelatory revelations as: “A gap in perspective exists because teens and
parents have different ideas of what sociality should look like.” Well, duh.
Stylistic quirks abound here
as well. One involves author danah boyd’s insistence on not capitalizing her
name – a decision she explains (online, not in the book) with specious,
self-indulgent reasoning that is so convoluted as to call into question her
ability to make objective judgments in other matters. (The argument essentially
comes down to “I get to define myself and call myself whatever I want,” the
same sort of statement that has historically been used and abused in
discussions over whether to use such words as Negro, colored person, black,
Afro-American, African-American, person of color, and so on.)
Another oddity, more germane
to the book, is boyd’s insistence on using the plural word “media” as if it is
singular, resulting, among many other things, in a chapter called
“Is Social Media Amplifying Meanness and Cruelty?” There are also many
sentences along the lines of, “Social media does not radically rework teens’
social networks.”
To the extent that these and
other peculiarities become distractions, they interfere with the power of
boyd’s arguments and the discoveries she has made. And that is too bad, because
It’s Complicated does have revelatory
elements. “Taken out of context, what teens appear to do and say on social
media seems peculiar if not outright problematic,” writes boyd, and she then
works on providing the context. One of her most interesting observations is
that networked teens make a distinction between “being public” and “being in public,” which means, from teens’
perspective, that in many cases, adults such as parents and potential employers
can see what teens are doing online
but shouldn’t. This is a very naïve
attitude (although as with other statements made by the teens she talks to,
boyd simply accepts it at face value), but it is in line with typical
teenagers’ feelings of self-importance and of being able to control their
environment, shaping it to their liking. Indeed, one of boyd’s comments is that
“teens fabricate information…seeking to control the networked social content”;
this, boyd says, explains outright falsities posted online. Teens then claim to
be puzzled or even angry (again, boyd takes the reactions at face value) when
adults respond with concern or worry about false postings involving, among
other things, sex and drugs.
One of boyd’s theses is that
“teens’ mediated interactions sometimes complement or supplement their
face-to-face encounters,” with social-media communication today being in effect
an update on teens’ endless talks on landline phones some decades ago; indeed, boyd
remarks on the pre-cellphone days in which teens used portable phones to go
into rooms where they could have some privacy while talking – those were, in a
sense, prototypes of “chat rooms,” which are predecessors of social media
(although boyd does not state the connection). The burden of accepting and
understanding the behavior of networked teens lies squarely with adults, boyd
argues – perhaps taking a little too seriously her own self-description as “a
researcher passionate about the health and well-being of young people.” Teens
have no obligation to explain themselves or their online behavior to adults,
according to boyd: “Teens’ engagement with social media – and the hanging out
it often entails – can take up a great deal of time. To many adults, these
activities can look obsessive and worthless. …[A]dults must recognize what
teens are trying to achieve and work with them to find balance and to help them
think about what they are encountering.”
It is certainly in the
interest of adults, especially parents, to understand what always-networked
teens are doing and why, although boyd’s overview of the matter is not entirely
helpful in noting that “few ask why teens embrace each new social technology
with such fervor. …Both entertainment and sociality are key reasons.” What is helpful in It’s Complicated is the way boyd explores some genuinely intriguing
elements of teenage interconnectedness, such as the phenomenon of “digital
self-harm,” in which some teens behave in ways that adults find troubling and
puzzling, for example by posting nasty questions that appear to be thrown at
them by others – and then answering them. This is an up-to-date version of the
“cry for help” that teens have engaged in, often in self-destructive ways, for
many years. Unfortunately, boyd does a better job of exploring the phenomenon
than of prescribing a way for adults to deal with it, falling back on the tired
“society has to be different” non-solution: “Although not all youth who are
struggling cry out for help online, many do. And when they do, someone should
be there to recognize those signs and react constructively. …But it requires
creating a society in which adults are willing to open their eyes and pay
attention to youth other than their own children.”
The Internet, boyd
repeatedly indicates, is not in itself a force for societal change (“the mere
existence of new technology neither creates nor magically solves cultural
problems”); but it certainly is
responsible for changes in the ways in which teenagers relate to each other and
to the world at large. It’s complicated,
true, as the book’s title asserts. But ultimately “it” (whatever “it” is) is no
more complicated than the angst-ridden uncertainty and immaturity of teenagers
of prior generations. The difference is that “it” is now played out in a far
more public and easily scrutinized manner, even if teens’ misguided sense of
immortality and empowerment makes them feel that they can control what they do
and how society perceives their activities, and that they have an inalienable
right to exercise that control.
No comments:
Post a Comment