The Book of Dragons. Edited by Jonathan
Strahan. Illustrated by Rovina Cai. Harper Voyager. $35.
You may think there are two schools of
thought about dragons: the Occidental, in which they evilly lay waste to vast
areas, breathe fire, and are ripe for destruction by a lengthy series of St.
George epigones; and the Oriental, in which they are earthbound or water-bound,
beneficent or at least neutral where humans are concerned, and are generally
harbingers of good luck. The Book of
Dragons, however, shows that there are 29 ways of looking at a dragon, one
for each contribution to Jonathan Strahan’s anthology. There may be even more,
but even an almost-600-page book has to end sometime.
Readers who are fond of dragon lore will
wish this volume went on even longer than it does, because the variegated views
of dragons espoused and explored herein make for fascinating reading from just
about every angle that fantasy takes today. Here is a mundane real-world
autobiographical tale that shades at last into wonder: Pox by Ellen Klages. Here is a traditional dragon-demands-maiden-sacrifice
story, turned personal and enigmatic: The
Nine Curves River by R.F. Kuang. Here is outlandish humor, in which dragons
have to figure out, among other things, lawsuits: Hikayat Sri Bujang, or, The Tale of the Naga Sage by Zen Cho. Here
is a tale so packed with detailed world-building that it feels like a novel
compressed into 20 pages, or a 20-page story around which a novel can (and
probably should) be built: Matriculation
by Elle Katharine White. Here are two poems of enigmatic thoughtfulness: What Heroism Tells Us and A Nice Cuppa by Jane Yolen.
Dragon lore is multifaceted, so in some
ways it is no surprise to find The Book
of Dragons so packed with so many variations on so fruitful a theme. But
the sheer extent of those variations is
a surprise, and a pleasant one. Dragons mean
so much in this book. They mean that it is better to be a low-paid lighthouse
keeper with dragons than a well-paid lawyer without them: The Dragons by Theodora Goss. They mean that a particularly lucky
dragon-slayer is forced by a particularly unpleasant prince to capture a dragon
alive so the prince can overcome it: Habitat by K.J. Parker. They mean that
an otherworldly tug-of-war is ongoing over dragon-shaped human souls, or rather
external manifestations of human emotions in the shape of dragons: Lucky’s Dragon by Kelly Barnhill.
And there is much more here, from some of
today’s best-known and most-accomplished fantasists – Michael Swanwick, Garth
Nix, Patricia A. McKillip – and from numerous up-and-coming fantasy authors
whose imaginative treatment of the topic is equally enthralling. It turns out
that dragons continue to inspire creativity of all sorts, often with echoes of
the traditional Occidental and Oriental views of them but equally often with
echoes of a different kind: Where the
River Turns to Concrete by Brooke Bolander, for example, imagines a river
spirit ousted by human encroachment in essentially the same way that this
happens in Hayao Miyazaki’s Spirited
Away, but with much more brutal consequences.
There are many stories here in which
dragons are central, as is only to be expected. But there are also some intriguing
cases in which they are almost incidental: Peter S. Beagle’s Except on Saturdays, which is more of a
musing upon the persistence of myth and the ways in which some people, a few,
are open to it even in the modern world; and Sarah Gailey’s We Don’t Talk about the Dragon, a tale
of an abusive family, more draconian than draconic, that is as monstrous in its
small, casual and constant cruelties as any imagined winged beast.
Most of the stories do their own word
painting, their own scene creation, rendering the nicely sculpted Rovina Cai
drawings decorative enough, but only modestly connected to the narratives or
illustrative of them.
Unsurprisingly, the book begins and ends
with Tolkien, specifically with quotations from The Hobbit about Smaug. The opening one is the dragon’s
self-description of might and potency; the closing one, Tolkien’s poetically
nuanced words, “So comes snow after fire, and even dragons have their endings.”
In truth, Smaug is dispatched in The
Hobbit with rather more alacrity and ease than would be expected, given the
buildup to his appearance and his own boastful words. But The Hobbit, unlike The Lord
of the Rings, was intended for younger readers, and at least in Tolkien’s
time, dwelling overmuch on the dragon’s depredations simply would not do. The
authors in The Book of Dragons, on
the other hand, are writing for adults, and their themes are frequently quite
dark and very adult indeed. They are also quite a bit further removed from
Tolkien than Strahan’s choice of opening and closing quotations might lead one
to expect. Today’s best fantasists have absorbed the lessons of Tolkien, yes,
but have by and large moved beyond them where dragons are concerned, finding
new ways to use the dragon legends – of whatever provenance. There is little in
The Book of Dragons that directly recalls
Smaug, but much to indicate that Smaug and other draconic characters of earlier
times continue to enthrall and captivate the newer generations of fantasy
authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment