Universal: A Guide to the Cosmos.
By Brian Cox & Jeff Forshaw. Da Capo. $35.
If you are wondering not
only how the universe works but also why it works the way it does and not some
other way, Universal: A Guide to the Cosmos
is your kind of book. It is also physics professors’ kind of book: Brian Cox is
a professor of particle physics and Jeff Forshaw is a professor of theoretical
physics, both at the University of Manchester in England. Clearly, Cox and
Forshaw spend their academic time with their heads way up in the clouds – more
accurately, way up above the clouds. But they obviously come down to Earth
periodically, if only to provide mere non-mathematically-inclined mortals with
lucid and fascinating explanations of how things are and why they are that way.
The “why that way?” notion is central to the book, with Cox and Forshaw
explaining that an important element of cosmic science involves determining the
same measurement by different means. Thus, an estimate of the sun’s age on the
basis of how nuclear fusion works and how much heat reaches Earth gives about
the same result for the age of the solar system (4.6 billion years) as an
estimate of Earth’s age based on radioactive decay in planetary rocks. Casting
doubt on any single measurement is relatively easy, Cox and Forshaw explain,
but “it is usually extremely difficult to argue for a radical change in one
area without making large parts of the whole interlinked edifice inconsistent.”
The “edifice” here is science
itself, and scientific inquiry. Universal
is as much about the scientific method and the way scientists explore the
cosmos as it is about intriguing specifics such as the Big Bang, supernovas,
and dark matter. One thing Cox and Forshaw do exceptionally well here is to
start by applying the scientific method to matters close to home and then
gradually (and without too much higher mathematics) extend inquiry farther and
farther out, into more and more complex and outré regions. Thus, the
how-old-is-Earth question appears early in the book and leads Cox and Forshaw
into well-paced, understandable discussions of plate tectonics and radioisotope
dating, with everything they present involving observation, collection of
evidence, and the application of logic to reach conclusions that can then be
further tested using, ideally, different
methodologies. The authors’ quotation of Richard Feynman at one point is
a wonderful kernel of explanation. Feynman said that the search for a new law
of nature starts with a guess, then a computation of the consequences of the
guess to see what would happen if the guess is correct – and then a comparison
of the computation with nature “to see if it works. If it disagrees with
experiment, it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It
does not make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it does not make any
difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is – if it
disagrees with experiment, it is wrong.”
This is a marvelous
encapsulation that Cox and Forshaw have clearly taken to heart. Readers will be
amazed at how easy it can be for anyone to test some important scientific
hypotheses – for instance, an experiment to show the largest size an atom can
be requires only cooking oil, a paper clip, a ruler and a bowl of water. Furthermore,
entirely mundane matters are shown in Universal
to be the foundation of extremely complex forms of observation and calculation.
Take parallax, which is crucial to determining astronomical distances. Cox and
Forshaw start by showing how it can be used to calculate the length of your own
arm by holding a finger in front of you: the left and right eye see things
differently, so by closing one and then the other, you can figure out the arm’s
length based on how the apparent position of the finger changes. One of the
many simple but elegant illustrations here shows how exactly the same procedure
can be used to find the distance from Earth to Neptune, with your eyes being
replaced for diagram purposes by the Earth in two different orbital positions
and with Neptune representing the finger. It is this sort of
clarity-through-extension that makes Universal
so eminently readable and so marvelously informative. Colorful photos help
enliven the book and enhance the explanations as well.
What permeates this book is
not only knowledge but also enthusiasm, and that is a source of much of the
strength of Universal. Cox and
Forshaw manage to deal with questions as huge as how much the universe weighs
and what happened before the Big Bang (if that question even has any meaning) –
without resorting to extreme complexities of calculation (the stuff that they
surely use in their own everyday professorial lives) and without distorting the
science they are explaining. They end up being near-perfect advocates both for
the scientific method and for training top scientific minds to communicate with
mere nonscientific mortals with tremendous insight and clarity – and without
ever making non-scientists feel they are being talked down to, or that the
tremendous difficulties of cutting-edge experimentation and analysis are being
“dumbed down” to such a point that they no longer reflect how scientists think
and how they test their thoughts for real-world (and real-universe) accuracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment