Respighi: Solo Piano
Music—complete. Michele D’Ambrosio, piano. Brilliant Classics. $11.99 (2
CDs).
Beethoven: Piano Sonatas, Volume
3—Nos. 22-32. Jean-Efflam Bavouzet, piano. Chandos. $37.99 (3 CDs).
Shostakovich: Piano Concertos
Nos. 1 and 2; String Quartet No. 2—Waltz: Allegro; String Quartet No. 8.
Boris Giltburg, piano; Rhys Owens, trumpet; Royal Liverpool Philharmonic
Orchestra conducted by Vasily Petrenko. Naxos. $12.99.
Although Respighi’s solo
piano music is little known and mostly consists of student pieces, it sheds
some interesting light on his later, better-known works. The chance to hear all
of this music is a very unusual one, and the Brilliant Classics release
featuring Michele D’Ambrosio is therefore highly welcome. Respighi lived from
1879 to 1936, and almost all his works for solo piano date to the late 19th
century or very early 20th. It is therefore scarcely a surprise that
many have derivative elements, notably echoing Schumann. The Sonata in F minor (1897), Sonata in A minor (1895-96), Andante in F (1895-96), Andante in D (1895-96), Allegro in B minor (1895-96), Preludio in B-flat minor (1898),
unfinished Preludio from “Suite per
pianoforte” (1903), and Preludio in D
minor (1903) are all nicely constructed works and, in the case of the
sonatas, ones showing a sure command of classical forms and the ability to
sustain musical ideas over multiple movements. None of the material is
especially distinctive in terms of what it has to say, however. The five-movement
Suite of 1898, though, is a pleasant
surprise: the material is light and harks back to music considerably earlier
than Schumann’s – the third movement, for instance, is marked Sarabanda – but there is a fleetness and
assurance to the piano writing that gives the work a distinctive stamp. The
same is true of the piano version of Variazioni
sinfoniche (1900), heard here in a world première recording that shows this piano piece to be different in
significant ways from the much-better-known orchestral version. And the loosely
connected Sei pezzi (1903) are also a
pleasant discovery, resembling the earlier Suite
in several ways and containing a waltz, nocturne, Canone and Minuetto – all
of which Respighi shows himself to understand well and to be able to create
with care and solidity. Nevertheless, all these pieces together, their total
time nearly an hour and three quarters, have less to show or tell listeners
about the elements that make Respighi’s music special than the only two
comparatively late piano works he wrote. These are the Antiche danze ed arie per liuto (1917-18) and Tre preludi su melodie gregoriane (1919). Respighi’s first suite of
Ancient Dances and Airs for Lute and
his four-movement Church Windows are
among his best-known orchestral compositions. These piano works offer an
opportunity to hear the pieces in their formative stages. The dances are
transcriptions, not free adaptations, and as such sound as straightforward and
accomplished on piano as they do in orchestral guise, although less
interestingly colored. Tre preludi
differs from Church Windows in
lacking a finale – Respighi added that in 1925 when he made the orchestral
version – and here the absence of elegant orchestration makes the piano piece
seem rather pale. Nevertheless, these two works provide considerable insight
into Respighi’s thinking and compositional process, and are worthwhile on that
basis as well as a purely musical one. D’Ambrosio’s performances are, like
Respighi’s piano music itself, straightforward and forthright, a fine melding
of the performer’s approach with that of the composer.
Far more often heard than
Respighi’s piano music, and available in innumerable fine performances, the
final 11 piano sonatas of Beethoven get elegant, classically balanced readings
from Jean-Efflam Bavouzet in a three-CD Chandos release that completes
Bavouzet’s Beethoven cycle. These performances have all the considerable
strengths and occasional shortcomings of those in the two earlier volumes. The
readings are uniformly clean, elegant and graceful, the pedaling discreet, the
emotions kept carefully in control to a degree that means that even when they
flow, as in the last three sonatas, they do so within firm boundaries that
Bavouzet sets. Bavouzet has technique to spare, and there is no evident strain
at all in his handsome reading of No. 29, the Hammerklavier. He is also quite comfortable with a work as small
and slight as No. 25, Op. 79, which is as much a sonatina as a sonata; indeed,
he gives this work just the right weightiness to show that it reflects Haydn
and Mozart while not being beholden to either. No. 23, Appassionata, and No. 26, Les
adieux, are a trifle less satisfying: here a listener may be waiting for
Bavouzet to cut loose a bit, to let the emotional impact of the music become
nearly overwhelming, but the performances are entirely too well-mannered for
that, and as a result come across as a bit too poised. The playing itself is
excellent, however. The last three sonatas are a collective puzzle as well as three
individual ones, and Bavouzet has obviously thought carefully about how to
handle them as entirely separate works that nevertheless form a trilogy of
sorts. The final variations of No. 30, Op. 109, are a high point here, with
Bavouzet characterizing each variation with care while nevertheless being sure
they all fit within an overarching concept. The emotive nature of the finale of
No. 31, Op. 110, is somewhat underplayed here, but the fugal material does not
come across as dry – merely as a touch more distanced from an emotional center
than might perhaps be ideal. Bavouzet’s handling of No. 32, Op. 111, is likely
to be controversial: it is quite quick, the whole lasting only about 24 minutes
– many performances run 30 minutes or more. Bavouzet does not give short shrift
to anything specific here, but he keeps the whole sonata moving along smartly,
never dwelling on its unusual elements or the surprises that other performers
find in it (such as the section of the second movement in which Beethoven appears
to invent jazz). The performance is in a sense emblematic of Bavouzet’s entire
Beethoven cycle: thoughtful, well-balanced, clearly articulated and leaning
more toward the Classical era than the Romantic, Bavouzet proffers Beethoven
sonatas that are technically excellent, carefully (if not always traditionally)
paced, and at times rather lacking in the deep emotional connections that other
pianists find in them. The general coolness of the approach will certainly
appeal to listeners who have had their fill of overwrought emotionalism in
Beethoven; it will not, however, please those who find greater expressive depth
in these sonatas than Bavouzet brings forth.
There is no shortage of
expressiveness in the Shostakovich works performed by pianist Boris Giltburg
and conducted by Vasily Petrenko on a new Naxos CD – but there are some curious
juxtapositions of types of
expressiveness. Aside from his theater music, Shostakovich’s oeuvre is scarcely thought of as light
or bright – even his excellent scherzos, whether in orchestral or chamber form,
include more bite than light. But his two piano concertos are unusual in this
regard: both the first in C minor (1933) and the second in F (1957) convey an
overall impression of brightness, if not exactly ebullience. The first concerto
makes a solo trumpet essentially equal to the solo piano, in impact if not in
total number of notes, both in the haunting central movement and in outer ones
in which the brass instrument keeps interfering mischievously with the percussive
one and insisting that matters be kept in a kind of Till Eulenspiegel realm of
trickery. The second concerto offers some genuinely surprising balance of
soloist and orchestra in the first movement, a quirky and parodic finale
immediately recognizable as typical of Shostakovich, and in the center a
movement of surprising emotional impact in which the sad and tender are mixed
and stirred. Giltburg plays both concertos with verve and style, and Petrenko,
whose stature as an interpreter of Shostakovich is very high indeed, expertly
interweaves the orchestral elements with those of the soloist and knows just
which ones should dominate at just what time. And there is more to this
excellent recording: two arrangements by Giltburg of material from
Shostakovich’s 15 quartets. The strange, quick, shadowy waltz from No. 2 (1944)
is as unsettling in isolation, and in Giltburg’s piano version, as it is in the
quartet itself. But the real capstone here is the entire eighth quartet, the
most often performed of the cycle, which is intensely autobiographical and was
written later than either piano concerto (in 1960). Shostakovich’s musical
signature, D-S-C-H, is featured throughout the quartet’s five movements, and
the work is full of striving and attempts that are designed so they never quite
gel, as when the start of a first-movement fugue degenerates – if that is the
right word – into self-quotation. The quartet is a complex work, difficult both
to play and to hear, and Giltburg has done a remarkable job of reducing it to
piano form without having it sound like a reduction. Instead, it sounds a bit
like an extended single-movement sonata/fantasia, a dark work (in C minor)
evocative not quite of despair but surely of deep unhappiness, yet one whose
central bitterness (carried through three movements) leads eventually to
something of acceptance, if never quite affirmation, in the finale. Giltburg’s
arrangement comes across as a tribute to Shostakovich, an argument that this
composer’s music, like that of Bach, can at least sometimes be independent of
the instruments on which it is performed, its underlying emotional resonance
coming through differently but equally strongly on an instrument for which the
work was never intended – but one that is quite capable of evoking the feelings
that Shostakovich strove so hard to elicit.
No comments:
Post a Comment