The Best 381 Colleges, 2017
Edition. By Robert Franek with Kristen O’Toole and David Soto. Princeton
Review/Random House. $23.99
All About Them: Grow Your
Business by Focusing on Others. By Bruce Turkel. Da Capo. $24.99.
The number of “best”
colleges in Princeton Review’s annual 800-plus-page survey book keeps creeping
up: there were 371 in 2010, then 373 in 2011, and so on until the current
assemblage of 383. Exactly how these almost-400 schools make the grade and the
remainder of the 4,000-plus do not is a bit of a mystery, but then, so is the
whole college admissions process, even for those who have negotiated it
successfully. Perhaps especially for
those who have negotiated it successfully, as in “How did he (or she) get in here?” One answer may lie in careful study of
this super-heavy tome, whose sheer size does not stop it from managing to
encapsulate each college in just two pages of statistics (campus life,
academics, selectivity, freshman profile, etc.) and commentaries – by students
(academics, campus life in general), the school itself, and Princeton Review’s
editorial team. These last remarks can be especially useful, explaining, for
example, that “very important factors” for Clemson University admission include
rigor of secondary school record, class rank, and state residency (South
Carolina), while at Moravian College those factors include character/personal
qualities, alumni/ae relation, and “level of applicant’s interest.” These
issues can quickly help students narrow down their list of college choices. Of
course, the winnowing can also be accomplished, using this same book, in
more-traditional ways, for instance by noting that Pitzer College students have
SAT scores of 620-720 in critical reading and 630-720 in math, with average
high school GPA of 3.9, while those at University of Dayton score 510-620 on
SAT critical reading, 520-630 in math, and have average high school GPA of 3.6.
Indeed, The Best 381 Colleges, 2017 Edition provides all sorts of ways to
compare and contrast schools. For instance, both Haverford College and Mills
College were found, in a student survey, to have lots of liberal students and
active minority support groups, and the phrase “diverse student types interact
on campus” applies to both; but at Haverford, which is in a “town” environment,
“students are always studying” and there is “lots of beer drinking,” while at
Mills, in a “metropolis” environment, “students are happy” and “dorms are like
palaces.” Students and families can decide which factors they care about most
and thumb through the book to find schools that provide the focus and
orientation they want. They can also use the profile of one school to search
for others – in some cases, although not all, the book lists schools that
“applicants also look at and sometimes prefer,” which means if Guilford College
might be a good fit, then it can be worthwhile to check out Earlham College,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Goucher College and Elon
University as well. Families looking at any
college should also, very emphatically, check out the “financial facts”
provided for each school, and should try not to be scared off by the huge
numbers. Dartmouth College, for example, has annual tuition of $48,120, plus
room and board of $14,238, required fees of $1,386, and books-and-supplies
costs of $1,260; but it also offers need-based scholarships averaging more than
$44,000. There may be no such thing as a free lunch – despite some politicians’
call for “free college for all,” which basically means forcing someone other
than students and their families to pay for it – but there is considerable
generosity among these schools, which puts a great many of them within
financial reach of all students who meet their entry qualifications. What The Best 381 Colleges, 2017 Edition does
not show is who gets left out of the equation: middle-class families considered
too “wealthy” to get substantial financial aid but not genuinely rich enough to
pay the colleges’ full costs. That, however, is a political hot potato that
neither this book nor politicians nor academics seem inclined to handle. Given
the current state of higher education and the absence of pie-in-the-sky
imaginary college freebees for all, The
Best 381 Colleges, 2017 Edition is as good a solution as any to the mystery
of how to come up with a solid list of attainable colleges (and maybe a few
“stretch” ones), and find out what it will cost to attend them and what it will
feel like to be on campus.
There are mysteries of a
different sort – the consumer type – explored in Bruce Turkel’s All About Them. This is a sort of 21st-century
version of Vance Packard’s justly famous The
Hidden Persuaders, the 1957 book that first showed consumers how companies
manipulate their wants, make them seem like needs, and use those “needs” to
sell all sorts of products whose value ranges from genuine to dubious. Turkel
is an expert at using those hidden persuaders, and from his perspective, which
is that of a contemporary marketer, persuasiveness in the service of greater
sales of just about anything is a grand goal. For example, he delights in the
story of the second-generation Toyota Prius, which became a huge hit as “the
instant darling of the Hollywood elite,” allowing any unimportant, grotesquely
overpaid celebrity nonentity to proclaim himself or herself “a sensitive world
citizen who cared deeply about the environment.” Turkel is delighted to quote a
New York Times story about marketing
research on the car that showed that “57 percent of Prius buyers said their
main reason for their purchase was that ‘it makes a statement about me,’ while
only 37 percent cited fuel economy as their prime motivator.” Meanwhile, the
essentially equivalent Honda Civic Hybrid languished in sales because it looked
like a regular Civic and did not give buyers the same sense of self-importance.
Buyers need not be upscale or even would-be upscale to be manipulated this way.
Turkel explains that he could not give his old tube TVs, which worked
perfectly, to Goodwill, since they were not flat screens: Goodwill would not
take them, because even people who must buy TVs there would only buy flat
screens. This is not exactly what was meant by the phrase “trickle-down
economics,” but it certainly seems like trickle-down manipulativeness.
Turkel is not the slightest
bit upset or even much concerned by the triumph of form over function; in fact,
he revels in the notion that “if all products and services work equally well,
or at least appear to,” then “people don’t choose what you do; they choose who
you are.” This explains everything from Apple’s success at selling coolness
rather than products to Barack Obama’s successful “yes we can” campaign slogan.
There is a lot more of this, including plenty of examples and a variety of
specific ways that today’s marketers can explore and exploit people’s
understandable predilection for buying products that make them feel good about
themselves and make their lives (at least apparently) better and more
meaningful. Really, none of this is new: it is all the same stuff that Packard
discussed when developing his theory of the eight hidden needs that advertisers
and marketers make consumers believe some product or other can fulfill. The
needs are emotional security, reassurance of worth, ego gratification, creative
outlets, love objects, sense of power, roots (family, nation, team, etc.), and
immortality (which is the desire to create meaning so our lives will not have
been in vain). It is scarcely necessary to read All About Them to see the many ways in which this 60-year-old list
is in constant use today in every medium imaginable. In fact, in one of the
many acronyms of which Turkel is fond (such as SPOC for “single point of
contact”), he neatly encapsulates a batch of Packard’s hidden needs: Turkel
writes about SMIRFs, “an acronym for the categories that encompass most
people’s passions,” which he says are Society, Milieu, Interest, Religion,
Fraternity, and Substance. That last one is somewhat questionable – “appearance
of substance,” as in the Prius example, may be more accurate – but the point
Turkel makes is that products and services do not actually have to serve these areas of passionate concern. They only
have to be made to seem to serve
them. And that is the job of marketers, such as Turkel himself. For businesses,
All About Them is a savvy, clear and
punchily written guide to taking lookalike, workalike products and making them
seem special and important by finding ways to manipulate consumers into
believing that one and only one in a group of otherwise identical products will
fulfill one or another of their deeply felt needs. For consumers, who
unfortunately are unlikely to read it, Turkel’s book can stand as a modern
explanation of the ways in which they are targeted and picked off, monetarily
speaking, every single day – indeed, many, many times a day. It reads a bit as
if The Hidden Persuaders had been
created by someone who thought the subtle and not-so-subtle ways of skewing and
skewering consumers’ brains were a good thing, not an appalling one. Packard
himself, who died in 1996, might not have been scandalized, but neither would
he have been particularly surprised.
We would like to make sure The Princeton Review’s selection process does not seem mysterious to your readers:
We selected these colleges primarily based on our high opinion of their academics. We monitor colleges continuously and annually collect data on more than 2,000 schools. Each year we also visit scores of schools, and meet with or talk to hundreds of college administrators. We pay close attention to feedback we get about colleges from students, parents, educators and our own staff at Princeton Review locations across the country. We also value the opinions of our college counselors and advisors, particularly our 24-member National College Counselor Advisory Board, comprised of high school guidance and independent college counselors from across the country.
To see more about how we compile The Best 381 Colleges, please go to:
FAQ http://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings/best-colleges/faq
Ranking List Methodology http://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings/ranking-methodology