The Sugar Detox: Lose Weight,
Feel Great, and Look Years Younger. By Brooke Alpert, M.S., R.D., C.D.N.,
and Patricia Farris, M.D., F.A.A.D. Da Capo. $24.99.
Tai Chi—The Perfect Exercise:
Finding Health, Happiness, Balance, and Strength. By Arthur Rosenfeld. Da
Capo. $19.99.
Sugar is bad for you. Stop
eating it. End of book.
Well, no – that would not
fill 282 pages. But it does encapsulate the message of nutrition consultant
Brooke Alpert and skin-care specialist Patricia Farris. The two argue in The Sugar Detox that sugar is addictive;
that people need to go cold turkey, as if they were quitting smoking, to break
the sugar habit; and that the energizing effect of sugar is not as good as the
energizing effect of vegetables, lean protein, whole grains, antioxidants and
fibers. All this can be a, shall we say, bitter pill to swallow, and in fact
the authors overstate their basically reasonable case in order to make their
points emphatically and persuade people to try their three-day no-sugar diet
and three-day regimen of such skin treatments as sea-salt baths and black-tea
masks. Like other extremists, Alpert and Farris take an all-or-nothing approach
to their subject – but it is worth noting that extremists are not necessarily
wrong. Much of what the authors say has been said, in different forms, by many
others; the material is simply packaged differently here. Alpert and Farris
tell readers to eat lots of spinach and other dark leafy greens; consume plenty
of broccoli, cabbage, kale and other cruciferous vegetables; eat seaweed and
seafood, legumes and nuts, cottage cheese and unflavored yogurt, whole grains
and citrus fruits; and drink water, red wine and green tea. There is nothing
revolutionary or even very unusual about any of this. It is in their
declaration of war against sugar, rather than their recommendations of what to
consume instead of it, that Alpert and Farris are most intense. They are on the
dictatorial side in their demands, as when they use some rather dubious and
disputed science to declare diet soda just as bad as sugar-sweetened soda and
proclaim, “This means no diet soda!”
– complete with italics and exclamation point. They are against bananas,
pineapple and watermelon – too sugary. They oppose raisins, prunes and other
dried fruit. No corn. No potatoes. No sweet potatoes. No winter squash. And
they present their recommendations in a lecturing, often hectoring tone that
will not be to many people's, ahem, taste: “We limit the amount of fructose you
can have.” “White rice seems so harmless, yet it’s like sugar in a bowl.” “Fruit
juice is unnecessary and we prefer that you eat a piece of fruit…” “Sodas, be
they diet or regular, are completely off limits…” “If you haven’t yet done the
3-Day Sugar Fix, you’ll want to start with that.” The Sugar Detox comes with recipes, menu plans, and a variety of
suggestions designed to help readers follow the authors’ prescriptions. But
they are prescriptions, of the “do
this because we say it’s good for you” variety – suitable mainly for the same
sorts of people who never question their doctors’ advice and simply do what
they are told to do because others have greater knowledge than they themselves
possess. If and only if you are comfortable being lectured to and instructed as
to how to eat and how not to eat, the clarity and strong advocacy of The Sugar Detox will be appealing;
otherwise, the book will strike a series of sour notes, less in what it says
than in how it says it.
In contrast, the narrative
of Tai Chi—The Perfect Exercise is as
gentle as the regimen itself. “But Is It the Right Choice?” asks one subhead,
and Taoist monk Arthur Rosenfeld immediately answers, “It is if we like the
idea of developing our body and mind together.” Rosenfeld delves a bit into the
history of tai chi: “…[T]he spiral is nature’s archetypal shape. …In
recognition of this natural design, tai chi movements – particularly Chen
style, the founding family’s original art – characteristically describe spirals.”
But most of the book explains how to practice tai chi and why it works –
sometimes in language that appears to be unintentionally amusing: “Holding too
much stiffness in our body, we are like a lollipop that has turned from candy
to iron.” A series of “Explorations,” each of them illustrated, is used to show
tai chi positions and what they are intended to accomplish. Quotations from the
Tao Te Ching set the mood and tone of
each chapter of the book. The chapter titles themselves reinforce the message:
“Secrets, Spirals, Mindfulness, and Water.” So do the subheads: “Creation,
Duality, and the Eternal Balance of the Wuji Mind.” It is absolutely necessary
to accept an Oriental attitude toward life, if not outright Oriental religion,
in order to make the most of this book, which is peppered with comments and
anecdotes about the Taoist creation story, the importance of “no plans, no
attachments, no goals,” and a reminder that “tai chi sets a very high
philosophical and physical standard.” This is a mind-body discipline, a form of
psychosomatic movement rather than what Westerners think of as an exercise. Its
deceptively simple movements, its emphasis on balance and on inner peace rather
than turmoil, make tai chi an attractive alternative to more-vigorous exercise
for many people, and it has been shown especially effective for the elderly and
those with physical limitations. What makes it “perfect” for Rosenfeld,
however, may not make it perfect for readers, since the author emphasizes again
and again that tai chi is not just
exercise: “There may be no physical practice anywhere more closely entwined
with a system of philosophy than the martial art of tai chi is with Lao Tzu’s
little book, the Tao Te Ching.” Readers
interested in relaxation, for example, need to read a chapter entitled “Sitting
with the Lesser Heavenly Circle” in order to get to the words, “You may
experience relief from any chronic pain, a lessening of anxiety, an increase in
your daily energy, a resistance to negative or off-balancing emotions, a new
clarity and focus in your thinking, and improved concentration.” These are
indeed the outcomes that most people hope for from tai chi. The question for
readers is whether they will be comfortable with the amount of time and space
that Rosenfeld devotes to the tai chi context compared with the amount that he
spends on the mechanics of the discipline. Readers seeking the spiritual
connections of tai chi will be far happier with this book than those who see
the practice as something closer to a gentle whole-body exercise than to the
expression of an overall approach to life.
No comments:
Post a Comment