Beethoven: Symphonies Nos. 5 and
7. Orchestre Révolutionnaire
et Romantique conducted by John Eliot Gardiner. SDG. $18.99.
Beethoven: Symphony No. 3;
Mendelssohn: Symphony No. 4. Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra conducted by
Bruno Weil. Tafelmusik Media. $16.99.
It may come as a
surprise to home listeners and concertgoers to learn that there is any sort of
“Beethoven problem.” After all, his works, particularly the symphonies, are ubiquitous,
performed just about everywhere by just about everyone, available in every
format from 78-rpm records to cell-phone ring tones.
That’s the
problem. How is it possible to make
these works sound fresh, to keep them as interesting and surprising, as dynamic
and dramatic, as they were in their own time, when they are now heard
everywhere, all the time, under pretty much all sets of circumstances? These
two new CDs provide one answer: perform the music on the instruments for which
Beethoven wrote it. That is, bring the
concept of historic performance practice, long accepted for Baroque music and
gradually making its way into other eras, into the Beethoven symphonies.
When well done, this
approach proves remarkable – as it is in the CD of Symphonies Nos. 5 and 7
played by Orchestre Révolutionnaire
et Romantique under John Eliot Gardiner. This live Carnegie Hall performance
from November 2011 is nothing short of revelatory. Horsehair bows and gut strings significantly change
the sound of violins; natural horns and trumpets produce sounds that pierce the
air differently from those of modern instruments – and then fall back more
readily into the ensemble; the occasional strain of producing the correct notes
at the proper volume comes through as a positive thing, not a negative, showing
just how revolutionary Beethoven’s music was and why some of it was initially
deemed unplayable. John Eliot Gardiner
also uses the exaggerated tempos that Beethoven himself indicated he wanted,
with the result, for example, that the introduction to the first movement of
Symphony No. 7 stretches out and out, while the movement’s main section really
dashes along – and the contrast is pronounced between the symphony’s scherzo
and its trio sections. The sound world
of these performances is distinctly different from the one that modern
concertgoers expect, and that difference is all to the music’s benefit. The introduction of trombones into the finale
of Symphony No. 5 here creates a very distinct change in the sound of the orchestra
– the instruments were previously used in sacred choral music but not in
symphonies, and they give the finale a distinct overtone of “last trumpet”
character (German speakers do in fact expect a trombone, not a trumpet, to
herald the Day of Judgment). These are outstanding
performances on every level – sonically, in ensemble, in the emergence of
individual voices and their quick reabsorption into the orchestra, in tempo
choice and in overall concept. They are
indeed “revolutionary and romantic” readings, quite unlike typical modern ones
of Beethoven, and they solve the “Beethoven problem” brilliantly by presenting
the composer’s works as he intended audiences to hear them – a guise in which,
even today, they still startle and amaze.
Bruno Weil and the Tafelmusik
Baroque Orchestra also offer an original-instrument approach to Beethoven, and
create a different sort of context by juxtaposing the “Eroica” symphony of 1804
with Mendelssohn’s “Italian” symphony, first played in 1833, six years after Beethoven’s
death. Weil’s Beethoven is not as
startling as Gardiner’s, its tempos being more in line with modern expectations
and its entrances and exits of instruments being smoother and less craggy: the
Tafelmusik players are almost too
comfortable with their instruments.
Nevertheless, it is quite clear how this first large-scale Beethoven
symphony builds in ways never before attempted, how it scales heights in its
first two movements that surpass anything that came before, and how Beethoven
makes unprecedented demands on orchestra players – the horns in particular –
that he was to expand even further in later works. Like the Gardiner performances, those by Weil
are live recordings (dating to May 2012), and there is a sense of palpable
involvement and excitement in them, although in both these recordings the
audience is commendably silent. The
addition of the Mendelssohn symphony to the “Eroica” is an interesting
experiment that is not wholly successful.
The reason for the pairing is not really clear: the works are very
different, and even though Weil gives the “Italian” symphony somewhat more-stately
pacing than it generally receives, especially in the first movement, this is by
no means a companion piece to the “Eroica” or a work on the same scale or of
comparable seriousness. The CD certainly
shows – and perhaps this is part of the intent – just how much Beethoven
changed music, for the “Eroica” itself is a dramatic break with the past, and
Mendelssohn’s “Italian” would have been quite inconceivable in the years before
Beethoven’s symphonies. The performances
here are skilled and diligent, and if they do not quite soar in the way that
Gardiner’s do, that is more a testimony to Gardiner’s superb approach than a
criticism of Weil’s somewhat more-straightforward one. And Weil certainly provides another very fine
answer to the “Beethoven problem,” not only using original instruments but also
showing Beethoven’s writing in its more-or-less-contemporary context, giving
listeners a welcome chance to hear the “Eroica” as a living, breathing, highly
influential work, not as a museum piece or one heard too frequently to be fully
appreciated.
No comments:
Post a Comment