Mendelssohn: Piano Concerto in A
minor; Haydn: Piano Concerto No. 11; Bach: Harpsichord Concerto No. 5, BWV
1056. Joshua Pierce, piano; Slovak National Symphony Orchestra conducted by
Kirk Trevor. MSR Classics. $12.95.
Peter Lieuwen: Concerto for Cello
and Orchestra (2012); Romance for Violin, Cello and Piano (1994/2010); Vivace
for String Orchestra (2010); Concerto for Piano, Marimba and Orchestra (2008).
Nicholas Jones, cello; Andrzej Grabiec, violin, with Misha Quint, cello, and
Carlo Alessandro Lapegna, piano; Leonel Morales, piano, with Jesus Morales,
marimba; Slovak National Symphony Orchestra and Texas Music Festival Orchestra
conducted by Franz Anton Krager. MSR Classics. $12.95.
Nedudim. Fifth House Ensemble
and Baladino. Cedille. $12.
A beautifully played
juxtaposition of keyboard works from three different time periods, Joshua
Pierce’s latest MSR Classics recording makes up through verve and musicianship
what it lacks in authenticity. None of the three composers on the CD wrote for
a piano that was anything like the one Pierce plays: modern concert grands had
not been developed when 13-year-old Felix Mendelssohn produced his remarkably
mature Piano Concerto in A minor,
much less when Haydn and Bach created the works heard here. Pierce’s
performances are pretty much the antithesis of historically accurate: he uses
the resources of a fine modern piano very well, and is a sufficiently sensitive
performer to avoid, to the extent possible, having the instrument overshadow
the accompaniment provided by the Slovak National Symphony Orchestra conducted
by Kirk Trevor. But there is only so much that Pierce can do about this: the
warmth and emotional involvement of the second movement of Haydn’s concerto,
for example, are thoroughly winning – and thoroughly out of character. But
listeners willing to suspend any focus they may usually have on historically
informed performance practices will be lured into this recording immediately
and swept away by it throughout. The Mendelssohn concerto is the highlight
here. Very little known, it was created before the two numbered Mendelssohn
piano concertos and is certainly a derivative work, with hints of Haydn and a
pronounced similarity to Hummel. In some ways it looks ahead, as in the
dramatic solo entrance in the first movement and the tying-together of the slow
movement and finale. In other ways it is clearly Mendelssohnian, as in the
gracefulness of the main slow-movement theme. And in the finale, the best of
the three movements, the concerto is highly virtuosic, rhythmically strong and
chromatically interesting, with propulsive forward motion that carries right
through to the minor-key conclusion. The concerto is actually longer than the
two numbered ones (although not as long as the CD states: the first movement’s
length is amusingly and incorrectly given, in two places, as “45:46”). This
piece may not have quite enough to say to justify its length, but it offers
more than sufficient reason to hear it on occasion; and both Pierce and Trevor
give the work considerable respect, refusing to dismiss it as mere juvenilia
(it was, after all, written at the same time as some of the very fine string
symphonies). The CD is well worth owning for this work alone. But the mixing
together of early Romanticism with Haydn’s Classical poise and Bach’s Baroque
ornamentation makes the recording even more interesting. Haydn’s concerto was
written for harpsichord or early fortepiano, and the work tilts too far in
balance toward a soloist using a modern piano, but the brightness and humor of
the piece, especially its Hungarian-flavored finale, come through very well
here. Bach’s concerto is more problematic. This F minor work is very definitely
intended for harpsichord – it consists of movements carefully arranged by Bach
from earlier pieces – and neither the comparative heaviness of the first
movement nor the warmth of the piano against the pizzicato strings in the second really fits the music. The
concluding Presto badly needs the
penetrating brightness of plucked harpsichord strings for full effect; even
Pierce’s fine pacing cannot make up for this lack. Nevertheless, this disc as a
whole is a very enjoyable one, and the Mendelssohn concerto is a real find.
The mixing is not of
stylistic periods but of musical styles themselves in another MSR Classics
release, this one featuring world premiรจre
recordings of concertos and other works by Peter Lieuwen (born 1953). Like many
other contemporary composers, Lieuwen produces works in classical forms, or at
least with classical titles, but packs them with music heavily influenced by jazz
and non-Western idioms. The result, at its best, is an intriguing blend; when
less successful, it is something of an oil-and-water colloidal suspension in
which it can be difficult for the ear to be sure which way the composer is
leading it. The first movement of the two-movement Concerto for Cello and Orchestra, for instance, has the cello
indulging in free flights of fancy while the accompaniment chugs along in
mostly uninspired fashion, while the second movement contrasts a tonal but
largely tuneless first section with a brighter second one. Romance for Violin, Cello and Piano is a meandering fantasia in
which the instruments go in their own directions rather than engage in
more-traditional chamber-music discussion. Here too there is a very repetitive
underlying element, in the piano; and there is similar “chugging” repetition in
Vivace – these foundational ostinato rhythms do ground the pieces,
but the constant drumbeat becomes wearing. Thankfully, there is less of this
approach in Concerto for Piano, Marimba
and Orchestra, the most successful work here, which combines and contrasts
the two percussion soloists in a way that makes it clear that the piano really is a percussion instrument. Although the
slow second movement meanders, the concerto’s outer movements, including a
finale with a distinct Latin cast, are sonically attractive and involving, and
very well played – as is all the music here. The CD as a whole is a (+++)
recording: it has more high points than low, but leaves the impression that
Lieuwen’s music is best heard a little at a time rather than in larger chunks.
Another (+++) CD takes the
notion of mixing things up even further – so much further that it is difficult
to figure out what audience the performers are reaching for. This is a Cedille
recording called Nedudim; the title
is Hebrew for “wanderings.” This is a sort of combinatorial jam session of two
groups whose members apparently like each other and each other’s style enough
to want to perform together, but whose topics and approaches are so very
different that their combination never seems to come together in any meaningful
way. One group, Chicago-based Fifth House Ensemble, favors traditional Western
orchestral instruments that it deploys in contemporary ways to produce modern
forms of chamber music. The other ensemble, Israel-based Baladino, uses Asian
and North African instruments such as the oud, shofar and duduk in the service
of folk music largely from Sephardic and Middle Eastern roots. There is
everything here from Indian raga to drone strings, from jazz flute to folk
singing, from American bluegrass to Persian and Turkish influences. The 11
tracks are clearly very personal reflections of the musicians’ concerns and
interests, as the heartfelt performances confirm. There is an improvisational
feel to the whole enterprise – the members of Baladino are in fact
improvisation-oriented – but the highly personal sort of enthusiasm underlying the
project never quite comes through to listeners uninvolved with creating the CD.
A couple of traditional Ladino (Judeo-Spanish) songs, a Dan Visconti piece in
which classically trained musicians are supposed to cut loose into jazz and
folk territory, a work including American blues guitar within Greek modal
writing, a love song from the U.S. Civil War – there are a lot of disparate
elements and distinct influences here, with the result that Nedudim lives up to its title without
ever quite indicating why an audience that is not part of the collaborative
project should want to go along on the groups’ stylistic and geographical
travels. Listeners would be well advised to sample bits of several individual
tracks here to decide whether the totality of the project is likely to strike
enough of a chord with them to become something with which they would like to
live – or whether, like many improvisations, the CD captures a particular
moment in time but lacks any significant staying power.
No comments:
Post a Comment